From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com,
serge.ayoun@intel.com, shay.katz-zamir@intel.com,
haitao.huang@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, kai.svahn@intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
josh@joshtriplett.org, luto@kernel.org, kai.huang@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 08/28] x86/cpu/intel: Detect SGX support and update caps appropriately
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 23:48:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190802204754.gw4elehzvnjh33jq@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724193542.GD25376@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:35:42PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 08:07:44PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> > index 8d6d92ebeb54..1503b251d10f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> > @@ -623,6 +623,72 @@ static void detect_tme(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > c->x86_phys_bits -= keyid_bits;
> > }
> >
> > +static void __maybe_unused detect_sgx(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long long fc;
> > +
> > + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL, fc);
> > + if (!(fc & FEATURE_CONTROL_LOCKED)) {
> > + pr_err_once("sgx: The feature control MSR is not locked\n");
> > + goto err_unsupported;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!(fc & FEATURE_CONTROL_SGX_ENABLE)) {
> > + pr_err_once("sgx: SGX is not enabled in IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR\n");
> > + goto err_unsupported;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SGX1)) {
> > + pr_err_once("sgx: SGX1 instruction set is not supported\n");
> > + goto err_unsupported;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!(fc & FEATURE_CONTROL_SGX_LE_WR)) {
> > + pr_info_once("sgx: The launch control MSRs are not writable\n");
> > + goto err_msrs_rdonly;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return;
> > +
> > +err_unsupported:
> > + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SGX);
> > + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SGX1);
> > + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SGX2);
> > +
> > +err_msrs_rdonly:
> > + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SGX_LC);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void init_intel_energy_perf(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > +{
> > + u64 epb;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Initialize MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS if not already initialized.
> > + * (x86_energy_perf_policy(8) is available to change it at run-time.)
> > + */
> > + if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EPB))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb);
> > + if ((epb & 0xF) != ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + pr_warn_once("ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'normal', was 'performance'\n");
> > + pr_warn_once("ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: View and update with x86_energy_perf_policy(8)\n");
> > + epb = (epb & ~0xF) | ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL;
> > + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void intel_bsp_resume(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS is lost across suspend/resume,
> > + * so reinitialize it properly like during bootup:
> > + */
> > + init_intel_energy_perf(c);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void init_cpuid_fault(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > {
> > u64 msr;
> > @@ -760,6 +826,11 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TME))
> > detect_tme(c);
> >
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_SGX) && cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SGX))
> > + detect_sgx(c);
> > +
> > + init_intel_energy_perf(c);
>
> All of the energy_perf additions are bogus, looks like a rebase gone wrong.
Thanks for catching this.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-13 17:07 [PATCH v21 00/28] Intel SGX foundations Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 01/28] x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel-defined SGX feature bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 02/28] x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX sub-features (as Linux-defined bits) Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 03/28] x86/msr: Add IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_ENABLE definition Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 04/28] x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel-defined SGX_LC feature bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 05/28] x86/msr: Add SGX Launch Control MSR definitions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 06/28] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Add new 'PF_SGX' page fault error code bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 07/28] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV for userspace #PFs w/ PF_SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 08/28] x86/cpu/intel: Detect SGX support and update caps appropriately Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-24 19:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-02 20:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-08-07 15:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 09/28] x86/sgx: Add ENCLS architectural error codes Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 10/28] x86/sgx: Add SGX1 and SGX2 architectural data structures Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 11/28] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 12/28] x86/sgx: Enumerate and track EPC sections Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 13/28] x86/sgx: Add functions to allocate and free EPC pages Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 14/28] x86/sgx: Add sgx_einit() for initializing enclaves Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 15/28] mm: Introduce vm_ops->may_mprotect() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 16/28] x86/sgx: Add the Linux SGX Enclave Driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-29 11:17 ` Ayoun, Serge
2019-08-07 15:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-07 15:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-07 16:45 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-08-08 15:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-09 15:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-09 15:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-05 16:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-05 21:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 17/28] x86/sgx: Add provisioning Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 18/28] x86/sgx: Add swapping code to the core and SGX driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-07 6:33 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-08-07 19:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 19/28] x86/sgx: ptrace() support for the " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 20/28] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 21/28] x86/fault: Add helper function to sanitize error code Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 22/28] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions in vDSO before signaling Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:07 ` [PATCH v21 23/28] x86/vdso: Add __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() to wrap SGX enclave transitions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-17 22:07 ` Xing, Cedric
2019-07-13 17:08 ` [PATCH v21 24/28] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-17 22:37 ` Xing, Cedric
2019-08-02 20:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-16 15:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-16 15:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-16 16:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:08 ` [PATCH v21 25/28] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:08 ` [PATCH v21 26/28] docs: x86/sgx: Add Architecture documentation Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:08 ` [PATCH v21 27/28] docs: x86/sgx: Document kernel internals Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-13 17:08 ` [PATCH v21 28/28] docs: x86/sgx: Document the enclave API Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-14 14:36 ` [PATCH v21 00/28] Intel SGX foundations Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-07 6:40 ` Jethro Beekman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190802204754.gw4elehzvnjh33jq@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=serge.ayoun@intel.com \
--cc=shay.katz-zamir@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).