* Re: [PATCH 7/7] sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t variant for shmctl
[not found] ` <ab475227-213f-2b97-e787-a0958cf7a4fc@linaro.org>
@ 2020-07-01 20:59 ` Vineet Gupta
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Vineet Gupta @ 2020-07-01 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adhemerval Zanella, Alistair Francis
Cc: Stepan Golosunov, GNU C Library, arcml, Alistair Francis
On 7/1/20 10:07 AM, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> Ack, you can also do a sniff test with the sysvipc tests to check if
>> they are ok.
>
> Ok, the __TIMESIZE should not be used to define the kernel_* struct anyway,
> they should be independent of the glibc time ABI selected or defined by
> the ABI.
>
> I have updated my personal branch [1] with an updated version and I will
> try to check if riscv32 at least built against. If you could also check
> it would be helpful.
>
> [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/azanella/semctl-y2038
I've rebased ARC port on this (dropped the prior versions from rv32) and these
seem to work !
| PASS: sysvipc/check-installed-headers-c
| PASS: sysvipc/check-installed-headers-cxx
| PASS: sysvipc/check-obsolete-constructs
| PASS: sysvipc/check-wrapper-headers
| PASS: sysvipc/test-sysvmsg
| PASS: sysvipc/test-sysvsem
| PASS: sysvipc/test-sysvshm
FWIW: Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread