[PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: fix timeout calculate method

[PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: fix timeout calculate method

[Alexey Brodkin]

Hi Kever,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 11:05 AM
> To: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin at synopsys.com>
> Cc: trini at konsulko.com; Eugeniy.Paltsev at synopsys.com; Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>; Peng Fan
> <peng.fan at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: fix timeout calculate method
> 
> Hi Alexey,
> 
> On 2019/8/30 ??9:28, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Hi Kever,
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> I think this tree does not including this patch, Peng drop it because of
> >> this issue,
> >> so you need to apply this patch in your branch to reproduce the problem.
> >> I have send out V2 patch for this fix with only using 32bit variable
> > Could you please refer me to the problematic patch so I may try it?
> 
> This is the patch with problem, and here is the link on patchwork:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1146845/

Please find my fixes here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1156541/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1156617/

Tom do we want https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1146845/ and fixes for it
(see 2 items above) to become a part of upcoming v2019.10 release or
it will be slated for the next one?

-Alexey

[PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: fix timeout calculate method

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019@12:24:42PM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Kever,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com>
> > Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 11:05 AM
> > To: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin at synopsys.com>
> > Cc: trini at konsulko.com; Eugeniy.Paltsev at synopsys.com; Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>; Peng Fan
> > <peng.fan at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: fix timeout calculate method
> >
> > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > On 2019/8/30 ??9:28, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > Hi Kever,
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > >> I think this tree does not including this patch, Peng drop it because of
> > >> this issue,
> > >> so you need to apply this patch in your branch to reproduce the problem.
> > >> I have send out V2 patch for this fix with only using 32bit variable
> > > Could you please refer me to the problematic patch so I may try it?
> >
> > This is the patch with problem, and here is the link on patchwork:
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1146845/
> 
> Please find my fixes here:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1156541/
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1156617/
> 
> Tom do we want https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1146845/ and fixes for it
> (see 2 items above) to become a part of upcoming v2019.10 release or
> it will be slated for the next one?

I think we should aim to get all the fixes in for this release.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/attachments/20190902/fa7d4fa2/attachment.sig>

[PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: fix timeout calculate method

[Alexey Brodkin]

H Tom,

[snip]

> > > This is the patch with problem, and here is the link on patchwork:
> > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1146845/
> >
> > Please find my fixes here:
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1156541/
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1156617/
> >
> > Tom do we want https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1146845/ and fixes for it
> > (see 2 items above) to become a part of upcoming v2019.10 release or
> > it will be slated for the next one?
> 
> I think we should aim to get all the fixes in for this release.

Done, see https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-September/382628.html

-Alexey