From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SPDX update for 5.2-rc3 - round 1
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 06:24:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190531132400.GA5518@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV=95sKB+h_pf45DiYeiJzrk1L=014Tj8Y04_hPyRMBNQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 09:17:06AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Greg, Thomas,
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:49 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > The following changes since commit cd6c84d8f0cdc911df435bb075ba22ce3c605b07:
> >
> > Linux 5.2-rc2 (2019-05-26 16:49:19 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git tags/spdx-5.2-rc3-1
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 96ac6d435100450f0565708d9b885ea2a7400e0a:
> >
> > treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Kbuild (2019-05-30 11:32:33 -0700)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > SPDX update for 5.2-rc3, round 1
> >
> > Here is another set of reviewed patches that adds SPDX tags to different
> > kernel files, based on a set of rules that are being used to parse the
> > comments to try to determine that the license of the file is
> > "GPL-2.0-or-later" or "GPL-2.0-only". Only the "obvious" versions of
> > these matches are included here, a number of "non-obvious" variants of
> > text have been found but those have been postponed for later review and
> > analysis.
> >
> > There is also a patch in here to add the proper SPDX header to a bunch
> > of Kbuild files that we have missed in the past due to new files being
> > added and forgetting that Kbuild uses two different file names for
> > Makefiles. This issue was reported by the Kbuild maintainer.
> >
> > These patches have been out for review on the linux-spdx@vger mailing
> > list, and while they were created by automatic tools, they were
> > hand-verified by a bunch of different people, all whom names are on the
> > patches are reviewers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> I'm sorry, but as long[*] as this does not conform to
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst, I have to provide my:
> NAked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
> [*] The obvious solution is to update Documentation/process/license-rules.rst,
> as people have asked before.
I don't understand, what does not conform? We are trying _to_ conform
to that file, what did we do wrong?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190531014808.GA30932@kroah.com>
2019-05-31 7:17 ` [GIT PULL] SPDX update for 5.2-rc3 - round 1 Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-05-31 13:24 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-05-31 13:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-05-31 14:02 ` Greg KH
2019-05-31 14:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-05-31 15:05 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190531132400.GA5518@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).