linux-spdx.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] random: add proper SPDX header
       [not found] <CAHmME9pc5NRLW4wUy57bqd_gX01PBVoydOQp9Z0rWT+j+fAb+Q@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2022-02-10 16:16 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  2022-02-10 16:49   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2022-02-10 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-spdx
  Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld, Thomas Gleixner, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Theodore Ts'o, Dominik Brodowski

Somehow this file missed the SPDXification efforts several years ago.
Convert the current license into "(GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause)".

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
Hi SPDX List,

I think I got this conversion right, but I would certainly appreciate a
review on this from somebody with more legal expertise than me.

Thanks,
Jason

 drivers/char/random.c  | 40 ++--------------------------------------
 include/linux/random.h |  5 -----
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index 324574b03120..a2bbae5a693d 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -1,44 +1,8 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause)
 /*
- * random.c -- A strong random number generator
- *
  * Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
- *
  * Copyright Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, 2003, 2004, 2005
- *
- * Copyright Theodore Ts'o, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999.  All
- * rights reserved.
- *
- * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
- * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
- * are met:
- * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
- *    notice, and the entire permission notice in its entirety,
- *    including the disclaimer of warranties.
- * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
- *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
- *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
- * 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote
- *    products derived from this software without specific prior
- *    written permission.
- *
- * ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of
- * the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are
- * required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions.  (This clause is
- * necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and
- * the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.)
- *
- * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
- * WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
- * OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ALL OF
- * WHICH ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE
- * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
- * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT
- * OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR
- * BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
- * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
- * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE
- * USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF NOT ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
- * DAMAGE.
+ * Copyright Theodore Ts'o, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999.  All rights reserved.
  */
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/linux/random.h b/include/linux/random.h
index e92efb39779c..1a6861aa1277 100644
--- a/include/linux/random.h
+++ b/include/linux/random.h
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
-/*
- * include/linux/random.h
- *
- * Include file for the random number generator.
- */
 #ifndef _LINUX_RANDOM_H
 #define _LINUX_RANDOM_H
 
-- 
2.35.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] random: add proper SPDX header
  2022-02-10 16:16 ` [PATCH v2] random: add proper SPDX header Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2022-02-10 16:49   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-02-10 16:53     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-02-10 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason A. Donenfeld
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-spdx, Thomas Gleixner, Theodore Ts'o,
	Dominik Brodowski

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 05:16:11PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Somehow this file missed the SPDXification efforts several years ago.

That is because it required manual review.

> Convert the current license into "(GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause)".
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> ---
> Hi SPDX List,
> 
> I think I got this conversion right, but I would certainly appreciate a
> review on this from somebody with more legal expertise than me.

Where did the "or later" come from?  I don't see that in the original
text.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> 
>  drivers/char/random.c  | 40 ++--------------------------------------
>  include/linux/random.h |  5 -----
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
> index 324574b03120..a2bbae5a693d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/random.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/random.c
> @@ -1,44 +1,8 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause)
>  /*
> - * random.c -- A strong random number generator
> - *
>   * Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
> - *
>   * Copyright Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, 2003, 2004, 2005
> - *
> - * Copyright Theodore Ts'o, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999.  All
> - * rights reserved.
> - *
> - * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> - * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> - * are met:
> - * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> - *    notice, and the entire permission notice in its entirety,
> - *    including the disclaimer of warranties.
> - * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> - *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> - *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
> - * 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote
> - *    products derived from this software without specific prior
> - *    written permission.

BSD-3, great.

> - *
> - * ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of
> - * the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are
> - * required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions.  (This clause is
> - * necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and
> - * the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.)

I do not see a "or later" here.


> - *
> - * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
> - * WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
> - * OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ALL OF
> - * WHICH ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE
> - * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
> - * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT
> - * OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR
> - * BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
> - * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> - * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE
> - * USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF NOT ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> - * DAMAGE.
> + * Copyright Theodore Ts'o, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999.  All rights reserved.

Why break the line-wrap?



>   */
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/random.h b/include/linux/random.h
> index e92efb39779c..1a6861aa1277 100644
> --- a/include/linux/random.h
> +++ b/include/linux/random.h
> @@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
>  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> -/*
> - * include/linux/random.h
> - *
> - * Include file for the random number generator.
> - */

This doesn't have to do with the SPDX change in the other file, it
belongs in a different patch, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] random: add proper SPDX header
  2022-02-10 16:49   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-02-10 16:53     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  2022-02-10 17:00       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2022-02-10 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: LKML, linux-spdx, Thomas Gleixner, Theodore Ts'o, Dominik Brodowski

Hi Greg,

Thanks for the review. Comments are inline below.

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:49 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Where did the "or later" come from?  I don't see that in the original
> text.

Yea, this part seems a little bit ambiguous:

> > - * ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of
> > - * the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are
> > - * required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions.  (This clause is
> > - * necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and
> > - * the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.)
>
> I do not see a "or later" here.

I don't see a "2.0" either. I think we can infer from context that it
couldn't have been < 2.0. So in the absence of a number, maybe this
means >= 2.0, and hence "or later"? Or since at the time it probably
meant 2.0, do we infer this to mean == 2.0? I really have no idea,
which is why I'm glad this list exists.

It sounds like your perspective is that this is == 2.0?

> > diff --git a/include/linux/random.h b/include/linux/random.h
> > index e92efb39779c..1a6861aa1277 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/random.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/random.h
> > @@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
> >  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > -/*
> > - * include/linux/random.h
> > - *
> > - * Include file for the random number generator.
> > - */
>
> This doesn't have to do with the SPDX change in the other file, it
> belongs in a different patch, sorry.

Ack.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] random: add proper SPDX header
  2022-02-10 16:53     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2022-02-10 17:00       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-02-10 17:01         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-02-10 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason A. Donenfeld
  Cc: LKML, linux-spdx, Thomas Gleixner, Theodore Ts'o, Dominik Brodowski

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 05:53:33PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Thanks for the review. Comments are inline below.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:49 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Where did the "or later" come from?  I don't see that in the original
> > text.
> 
> Yea, this part seems a little bit ambiguous:
> 
> > > - * ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of
> > > - * the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are
> > > - * required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions.  (This clause is
> > > - * necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and
> > > - * the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.)
> >
> > I do not see a "or later" here.
> 
> I don't see a "2.0" either. I think we can infer from context that it
> couldn't have been < 2.0. So in the absence of a number, maybe this
> means >= 2.0, and hence "or later"? Or since at the time it probably
> meant 2.0, do we infer this to mean == 2.0? I really have no idea,
> which is why I'm glad this list exists.
> 
> It sounds like your perspective is that this is == 2.0?

Without a "or later" it has to be "2.0" as that is what the overall
kernel license is.  That's what we did for the big SPDX sweep, so that
keeps things being decided in the same manner.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] random: add proper SPDX header
  2022-02-10 17:00       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-02-10 17:01         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  2022-02-10 17:06           ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2022-02-10 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: LKML, linux-spdx, Thomas Gleixner, Theodore Ts'o, Dominik Brodowski

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 6:00 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 05:53:33PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Thanks for the review. Comments are inline below.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:49 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > Where did the "or later" come from?  I don't see that in the original
> > > text.
> >
> > Yea, this part seems a little bit ambiguous:
> >
> > > > - * ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of
> > > > - * the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are
> > > > - * required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions.  (This clause is
> > > > - * necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and
> > > > - * the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.)
> > >
> > > I do not see a "or later" here.
> >
> > I don't see a "2.0" either. I think we can infer from context that it
> > couldn't have been < 2.0. So in the absence of a number, maybe this
> > means >= 2.0, and hence "or later"? Or since at the time it probably
> > meant 2.0, do we infer this to mean == 2.0? I really have no idea,
> > which is why I'm glad this list exists.
> >
> > It sounds like your perspective is that this is == 2.0?
>
> Without a "or later" it has to be "2.0" as that is what the overall
> kernel license is.  That's what we did for the big SPDX sweep, so that
> keeps things being decided in the same manner.

Sounds good. v3 incoming.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3] random: add proper SPDX header
  2022-02-10 17:01         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2022-02-10 17:06           ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  2022-02-10 17:12             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2022-02-10 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-spdx
  Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld, Thomas Gleixner, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Theodore Ts'o, Dominik Brodowski

Convert the current license into the SPDX notation of "(GPL-2.0 OR
BSD-3-Clause)". This infers GPL-2.0 from the text "ALTERNATIVELY, this
product may be distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public
License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are required INSTEAD OF
the above restrictions" and it infers BSD-3-Clause from the verbatim
BSD 3 clause license in the file.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
Changes v2->v3:
- GPL-2.0-or-later is now a vanilla GPL-2.0.
- Remove non-license changes.

 drivers/char/random.c | 37 +------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index 324574b03120..ea4a89129865 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -1,44 +1,9 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause)
 /*
- * random.c -- A strong random number generator
- *
  * Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
- *
  * Copyright Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, 2003, 2004, 2005
- *
  * Copyright Theodore Ts'o, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999.  All
  * rights reserved.
- *
- * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
- * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
- * are met:
- * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
- *    notice, and the entire permission notice in its entirety,
- *    including the disclaimer of warranties.
- * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
- *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
- *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
- * 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote
- *    products derived from this software without specific prior
- *    written permission.
- *
- * ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of
- * the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are
- * required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions.  (This clause is
- * necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and
- * the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.)
- *
- * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
- * WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
- * OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ALL OF
- * WHICH ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE
- * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
- * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT
- * OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR
- * BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
- * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
- * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE
- * USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF NOT ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
- * DAMAGE.
  */
 
 /*
-- 
2.35.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] random: add proper SPDX header
  2022-02-10 17:06           ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2022-02-10 17:12             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-02-10 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason A. Donenfeld
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-spdx, Thomas Gleixner, Theodore Ts'o,
	Dominik Brodowski

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 06:06:51PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Convert the current license into the SPDX notation of "(GPL-2.0 OR
> BSD-3-Clause)". This infers GPL-2.0 from the text "ALTERNATIVELY, this
> product may be distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are required INSTEAD OF
> the above restrictions" and it infers BSD-3-Clause from the verbatim
> BSD 3 clause license in the file.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> ---
> Changes v2->v3:
> - GPL-2.0-or-later is now a vanilla GPL-2.0.
> - Remove non-license changes.
> 
>  drivers/char/random.c | 37 +------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 36 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-10 17:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <CAHmME9pc5NRLW4wUy57bqd_gX01PBVoydOQp9Z0rWT+j+fAb+Q@mail.gmail.com>
2022-02-10 16:16 ` [PATCH v2] random: add proper SPDX header Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-10 16:49   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-10 16:53     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-10 17:00       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-10 17:01         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-10 17:06           ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-02-10 17:12             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).