* [PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips
@ 2008-10-21 11:41 Mark Jackson
[not found] ` <48FDBFF9.2020901-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Jackson @ 2008-10-21 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dbrownell; +Cc: lkml, Alessandro Zummo, rtc-linux, spi-devel-general
v4 of this patch with some code tidying as per previous comments.
Also only a single tx/rx buffer is used.
Now uses spi_write_then_read()
Comments changed to include extra chips in the family
This patch adds support for the Dallas DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC chip.
Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>
---
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 11 +++
drivers/rtc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1390.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
index 9a9755c..2d87c81 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
@@ -292,6 +292,17 @@ config RTC_DRV_DS1305
This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
will be called rtc-ds1305.
+config RTC_DRV_DS1390
+ tristate "Dallas/Maxim DS1390/93/94"
+ help
+ If you say yes here you get support for the DS1390/93/94 chips.
+
+ This driver only supports the RTC feature, and not other chip
+ features such as alarms and trickle charging.
+
+ This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
+ will be called rtc-ds1390.
+
config RTC_DRV_MAX6902
tristate "Maxim MAX6902"
help
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Makefile b/drivers/rtc/Makefile
index 18622ef..6306900 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Makefile
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1302) += rtc-ds1302.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1305) += rtc-ds1305.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307) += rtc-ds1307.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1374) += rtc-ds1374.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1390) += rtc-ds1390.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1511) += rtc-ds1511.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1553) += rtc-ds1553.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1672) += rtc-ds1672.o
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1390.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1390.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..599e976
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1390.c
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * rtc-ds1390.c -- driver for DS1390/93/94
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 Mercury IMC Ltd
+ * Written by Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * NOTE : Currently this driver only supports the bare minimum for read
+ * and write the RTC. The extra features provided by the chip family
+ * (alarms, trickle charger, different control registers) are unavailable.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/rtc.h>
+#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
+#include <linux/bcd.h>
+
+#define DS1390_REG_100THS 0x00
+#define DS1390_REG_SECONDS 0x01
+#define DS1390_REG_MINUTES 0x02
+#define DS1390_REG_HOURS 0x03
+#define DS1390_REG_DAY 0x04
+#define DS1390_REG_DATE 0x05
+#define DS1390_REG_MONTH_CENT 0x06
+#define DS1390_REG_YEAR 0x07
+
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_100THS 0x08
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_SECONDS 0x09
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_MINUTES 0x0A
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_HOURS 0x0B
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_DAY_DATE 0x0C
+
+#define DS1390_REG_CONTROL 0x0D
+#define DS1390_REG_STATUS 0x0E
+#define DS1390_REG_TRICKLE 0x0F
+
+struct ds1390 {
+ struct rtc_device *rtc;
+ u8 txrx_buf[9]; /* cmd + 8 registers */
+};
+
+static void ds1390_set_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
+ unsigned char data)
+{
+ struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
+ struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ /* Set MSB to indicate write */
+ chip->txrx_buf[0] = address | 0x80;
+ chip->txrx_buf[1] = data;
+
+ /* do the i/o */
+ spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 2, NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static int ds1390_get_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
+ unsigned char *data)
+{
+ struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
+ struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int status;
+
+ if (!data)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Clear MSB to indicate read */
+ chip->txrx_buf[0] = address & 0x7f;
+ /* do the i/o */
+ status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 1);
+ if (status != 0)
+ return status;
+
+ *data = chip->txrx_buf[1];
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int ds1390_get_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
+{
+ struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
+ struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int status;
+
+ /* build the message */
+ chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS;
+
+ /* do the i/o */
+ status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 8);
+ if (status != 0)
+ return status;
+
+ /* The chip sends data in this order:
+ * Seconds, Minutes, Hours, Day, Date, Month / Century, Year */
+ dt->tm_sec = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[0]);
+ dt->tm_min = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[1]);
+ dt->tm_hour = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[2]);
+ dt->tm_wday = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[3]);
+ dt->tm_mday = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[4]);
+ /* mask off century bit */
+ dt->tm_mon = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x7f) - 1;
+ /* adjust for century bit */
+ dt->tm_year = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[6]) + ((chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x80) ? 100 : 0);
+
+ return rtc_valid_tm(dt);
+}
+
+static int ds1390_set_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
+{
+ struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
+ struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ /* build the message */
+ chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS | 0x80;
+ chip->txrx_buf[1] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_sec);
+ chip->txrx_buf[2] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_min);
+ chip->txrx_buf[3] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_hour);
+ chip->txrx_buf[4] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_wday);
+ chip->txrx_buf[5] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mday);
+ chip->txrx_buf[6] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mon + 1) |
+ ((dt->tm_year > 99) ? 0x80 : 0x00);
+ chip->txrx_buf[7] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_year % 100);
+
+ /* do the i/o */
+ return spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 8, NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static int ds1390_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
+{
+ return ds1390_get_datetime(dev, tm);
+}
+
+static int ds1390_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
+{
+ return ds1390_set_datetime(dev, tm);
+}
+
+static const struct rtc_class_ops ds1390_rtc_ops = {
+ .read_time = ds1390_read_time,
+ .set_time = ds1390_set_time,
+};
+
+static int __devinit ds1390_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+ struct rtc_device *rtc;
+ unsigned char tmp;
+ struct ds1390 *chip;
+ int res;
+
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "DS1390 SPI RTC driver\n");
+
+ rtc = rtc_device_register("ds1390",
+ &spi->dev, &ds1390_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
+ if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
+ printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to register device\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(rtc);
+ }
+
+ spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
+ spi->bits_per_word = 8;
+ spi_setup(spi);
+
+ chip = kzalloc(sizeof *chip, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!chip) {
+ printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to allocate device memory\n");
+ rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ chip->rtc = rtc;
+ dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, chip);
+
+ res = ds1390_get_reg(&spi->dev, DS1390_REG_SECONDS, &tmp);
+ if (res) {
+ printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to read device\n");
+ rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
+ return res;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __devexit ds1390_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+ struct ds1390 *chip = platform_get_drvdata(spi);
+ struct rtc_device *rtc = chip->rtc;
+
+ if (rtc)
+ rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
+
+ kfree(chip);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct spi_driver ds1390_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "rtc-ds1390",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
+ .probe = ds1390_probe,
+ .remove = __devexit_p(ds1390_remove),
+};
+
+static __init int ds1390_init(void)
+{
+ return spi_register_driver(&ds1390_driver);
+}
+module_init(ds1390_init);
+
+static __exit void ds1390_exit(void)
+{
+ spi_unregister_driver(&ds1390_driver);
+}
+module_exit(ds1390_exit);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips
[not found] ` <48FDBFF9.2020901-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-10-21 17:53 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-10-21 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Zummo @ 2008-10-21 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Jackson
Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b,
dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, lkml,
rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:41:45 +0100
Mark Jackson <mpfj-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> v4 of this patch with some code tidying as per previous comments.
> Also only a single tx/rx buffer is used.
> Now uses spi_write_then_read()
> Comments changed to include extra chips in the family
>
> This patch adds support for the Dallas DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson <mpfj-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org>
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips
[not found] ` <48FDBFF9.2020901-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-21 17:53 ` Alessandro Zummo
@ 2008-10-21 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-10-21 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Jackson
Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
alessandro.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ,
dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:41:45 +0100
Mark Jackson <mpfj-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> v4 of this patch with some code tidying as per previous comments.
> Also only a single tx/rx buffer is used.
> Now uses spi_write_then_read()
> Comments changed to include extra chips in the family
>
> This patch adds support for the Dallas DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC chip.
>
A neat-looking driver. Some nitlets:
> +
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_100THS 0x08
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_SECONDS 0x09
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_MINUTES 0x0A
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_HOURS 0x0B
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_DAY_DATE 0x0C
> +
> +#define DS1390_REG_CONTROL 0x0D
> +#define DS1390_REG_STATUS 0x0E
> +#define DS1390_REG_TRICKLE 0x0F
> +
> +struct ds1390 {
> + struct rtc_device *rtc;
> + u8 txrx_buf[9]; /* cmd + 8 registers */
> +};
> +
> +static void ds1390_set_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
> + unsigned char data)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> + struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* Set MSB to indicate write */
> + chip->txrx_buf[0] = address | 0x80;
> + chip->txrx_buf[1] = data;
> +
> + /* do the i/o */
> + spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 2, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_get_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
> + unsigned char *data)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> + struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int status;
> +
> + if (!data)
> + return -EINVAL;
This function only has one caller and that caller doesn't pass NULL, so
this test is unneeded.
> + /* Clear MSB to indicate read */
> + chip->txrx_buf[0] = address & 0x7f;
> + /* do the i/o */
> + status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 1);
> + if (status != 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + *data = chip->txrx_buf[1];
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_get_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> + struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int status;
> +
> + /* build the message */
> + chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS;
> +
> + /* do the i/o */
> + status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 8);
> + if (status != 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + /* The chip sends data in this order:
> + * Seconds, Minutes, Hours, Day, Date, Month / Century, Year */
> + dt->tm_sec = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[0]);
> + dt->tm_min = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[1]);
> + dt->tm_hour = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[2]);
> + dt->tm_wday = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[3]);
> + dt->tm_mday = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[4]);
> + /* mask off century bit */
> + dt->tm_mon = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x7f) - 1;
> + /* adjust for century bit */
> + dt->tm_year = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[6]) + ((chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x80) ? 100 : 0);
> +
> + return rtc_valid_tm(dt);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_set_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> + struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* build the message */
> + chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS | 0x80;
> + chip->txrx_buf[1] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_sec);
> + chip->txrx_buf[2] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_min);
> + chip->txrx_buf[3] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_hour);
> + chip->txrx_buf[4] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_wday);
> + chip->txrx_buf[5] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mday);
> + chip->txrx_buf[6] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mon + 1) |
> + ((dt->tm_year > 99) ? 0x80 : 0x00);
> + chip->txrx_buf[7] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_year % 100);
> +
> + /* do the i/o */
> + return spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 8, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> +{
> + return ds1390_get_datetime(dev, tm);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> +{
> + return ds1390_set_datetime(dev, tm);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rtc_class_ops ds1390_rtc_ops = {
> + .read_time = ds1390_read_time,
> + .set_time = ds1390_set_time,
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit ds1390_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + struct rtc_device *rtc;
> + unsigned char tmp;
> + struct ds1390 *chip;
> + int res;
> +
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "DS1390 SPI RTC driver\n");
Should be KERN_INFO I guess.
> + rtc = rtc_device_register("ds1390",
> + &spi->dev, &ds1390_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> + if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
> + printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to register device\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(rtc);
> + }
> +
> + spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
> + spi->bits_per_word = 8;
> + spi_setup(spi);
> +
> + chip = kzalloc(sizeof *chip, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!chip) {
> + printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to allocate device memory\n");
> + rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + chip->rtc = rtc;
> + dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, chip);
> +
> + res = ds1390_get_reg(&spi->dev, DS1390_REG_SECONDS, &tmp);
> + if (res) {
> + printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to read device\n");
- Perhaps the "RTC" should identify which driver is doing the
shouting. We have a huge number of "rtc" drivers, so this message
will be rather ambiguous.
- Colons are not preceded by spaces in written English.
> + rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> + return res;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit ds1390_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + struct ds1390 *chip = platform_get_drvdata(spi);
> + struct rtc_device *rtc = chip->rtc;
> +
> + if (rtc)
> + rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> +
> + kfree(chip);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct spi_driver ds1390_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "rtc-ds1390",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = ds1390_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(ds1390_remove),
> +};
> +
> +static __init int ds1390_init(void)
> +{
> + return spi_register_driver(&ds1390_driver);
> +}
> +module_init(ds1390_init);
> +
> +static __exit void ds1390_exit(void)
> +{
> + spi_unregister_driver(&ds1390_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(ds1390_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Jackson <mpfj-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-21 22:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-21 11:41 [PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips Mark Jackson
[not found] ` <48FDBFF9.2020901-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-21 17:53 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-10-21 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).