* [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi_sh: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_sh_remove
@ 2011-05-11 13:27 Axel Lin
2011-05-11 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi_tegra: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_tegra_remove Axel Lin
2011-05-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi_sh: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_sh_remove Grant Likely
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Axel Lin @ 2011-05-11 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, Yoshihiro Shimoda
spi_master_put() should only be used in error handling.
Once spi_register_master() returns success, we should call
spi_unregister_master() instead.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi_sh.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_sh.c b/drivers/spi/spi_sh.c
index 869a07d..9eedd71 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi_sh.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi_sh.c
@@ -427,10 +427,10 @@ static int __devexit spi_sh_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct spi_sh_data *ss = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+ spi_unregister_master(ss->master);
destroy_workqueue(ss->workqueue);
free_irq(ss->irq, ss);
iounmap(ss->addr);
- spi_master_put(ss->master);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi_tegra: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_tegra_remove
2011-05-11 13:27 [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi_sh: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_sh_remove Axel Lin
@ 2011-05-11 13:28 ` Axel Lin
2011-05-19 19:02 ` Grant Likely
2011-05-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi_sh: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_sh_remove Grant Likely
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Axel Lin @ 2011-05-11 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, Erik Gilling
spi_master_put() should only be used in error handling.
Once spi_register_master() returns success, we should call
spi_unregister_master() instead.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c b/drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c
index 891e590..6c3aa6e 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ static int __devexit spi_tegra_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
master = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
tspi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+ spi_unregister_master(master);
tegra_dma_free_channel(tspi->rx_dma);
dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, sizeof(u32) * BB_LEN,
@@ -586,7 +587,6 @@ static int __devexit spi_tegra_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_put(tspi->clk);
iounmap(tspi->base);
- spi_master_put(master);
r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
release_mem_region(r->start, (r->end - r->start) + 1);
--
1.7.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi_sh: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_sh_remove
2011-05-11 13:27 [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi_sh: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_sh_remove Axel Lin
2011-05-11 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi_tegra: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_tegra_remove Axel Lin
@ 2011-05-19 19:01 ` Grant Likely
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-05-19 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Axel Lin; +Cc: linux-kernel, Yoshihiro Shimoda, spi-devel-general
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:27:00PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> spi_master_put() should only be used in error handling.
> Once spi_register_master() returns success, we should call
> spi_unregister_master() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks.
g.
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi_sh.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_sh.c b/drivers/spi/spi_sh.c
> index 869a07d..9eedd71 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi_sh.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_sh.c
> @@ -427,10 +427,10 @@ static int __devexit spi_sh_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct spi_sh_data *ss = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>
> + spi_unregister_master(ss->master);
> destroy_workqueue(ss->workqueue);
> free_irq(ss->irq, ss);
> iounmap(ss->addr);
> - spi_master_put(ss->master);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi_tegra: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_tegra_remove
2011-05-11 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi_tegra: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_tegra_remove Axel Lin
@ 2011-05-19 19:02 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-05-19 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Axel Lin; +Cc: linux-kernel, Erik Gilling, spi-devel-general
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:28:16PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> spi_master_put() should only be used in error handling.
> Once spi_register_master() returns success, we should call
> spi_unregister_master() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks.
g.
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c b/drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c
> index 891e590..6c3aa6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_tegra.c
> @@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ static int __devexit spi_tegra_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> master = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> tspi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
>
> + spi_unregister_master(master);
> tegra_dma_free_channel(tspi->rx_dma);
>
> dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, sizeof(u32) * BB_LEN,
> @@ -586,7 +587,6 @@ static int __devexit spi_tegra_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> clk_put(tspi->clk);
> iounmap(tspi->base);
>
> - spi_master_put(master);
> r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> release_mem_region(r->start, (r->end - r->start) + 1);
>
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-19 19:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-11 13:27 [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi_sh: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_sh_remove Axel Lin
2011-05-11 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi_tegra: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_tegra_remove Axel Lin
2011-05-19 19:02 ` Grant Likely
2011-05-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi_sh: calling spi_unregister_master instead of spi_master_put in spi_sh_remove Grant Likely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).