[PATCH] spi: spi-sprd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[PATCH] spi: spi-sprd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
actual functional changes.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
index 28e70db9bbba..65b8075da4eb 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
@@ -1008,9 +1008,8 @@ static int sprd_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct sprd_spi *ss = spi_controller_get_devdata(sctlr);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ss->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ss->dev);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(ss->dev);
 		dev_err(ss->dev, "failed to resume SPI controller\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-sprd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:55:06 +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
> pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
> actual functional changes.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-sprd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
      commit: b9db82e5f24932d3a1005ce17b2ef564487c1bca

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark