linux-spi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] SPI: fix build with CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI=m
@ 2011-08-23  7:59 Jiri Slaby
  2011-08-23  8:49 ` Jiri Slaby
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2011-08-23  7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: grant.likely
  Cc: spi-devel-general, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, jirislaby, Jiri Slaby

When spi_fsl_espi is chosen to be built as a module, there is a build
error because we test only CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI in declaration of
struct mpc8xxx_spi in drivers/spi/spi_fsl_lib.h.

We need to add a test for CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI_MODULE too.

The error looks like:
drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.c: In function 'fsl_espi_bufs':
drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.c:232: error: 'struct mpc8xxx_spi' has no member named 'len'
...

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
index cbe881b..97968de 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct mpc8xxx_spi {
 	/* rx & tx bufs from the spi_transfer */
 	const void *tx;
 	void *rx;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI) || defined(CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI_MODULE)
 	int len;
 #endif
 
-- 
1.7.6

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] SPI: fix build with CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI=m
  2011-08-23  7:59 [PATCH] SPI: fix build with CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI=m Jiri Slaby
@ 2011-08-23  8:49 ` Jiri Slaby
       [not found]   ` <4E5369A0.4080701-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2011-08-23  8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Slaby; +Cc: grant.likely, spi-devel-general, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

On 08/23/2011 09:59 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> When spi_fsl_espi is chosen to be built as a module, there is a build
> error because we test only CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI in declaration of
> struct mpc8xxx_spi in drivers/spi/spi_fsl_lib.h.
> 
> We need to add a test for CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI_MODULE too.
> 
> The error looks like:
> drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.c: In function 'fsl_espi_bufs':
> drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.c:232: error: 'struct mpc8xxx_spi' has no member named 'len'
> ...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
> index cbe881b..97968de 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct mpc8xxx_spi {
>  	/* rx & tx bufs from the spi_transfer */
>  	const void *tx;
>  	void *rx;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI) || defined(CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI_MODULE)
>  	int len;
>  #endif

Oh, and there are still link errors:
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_tx_buf_u32" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_rx_buf_u32" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_tx_buf_u16" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_rx_buf_u16" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_tx_buf_u8" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_rx_buf_u8" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "of_mpc8xxx_spi_probe" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_strmode" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_probe" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_remove" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "to_of_pinfo" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_tx_buf_u32" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_rx_buf_u32" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "of_mpc8xxx_spi_probe" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_probe" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_remove" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!

The functions are not exported...

Should I export all those or deny CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI=m?

thanks,
-- 
js

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] SPI: fix build with CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI=m
       [not found]   ` <4E5369A0.4080701-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-11-24  7:22     ` Kumar Gala
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-11-24  7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Slaby
  Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, Jiri Slaby,
	linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA


On Aug 23, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:

> On 08/23/2011 09:59 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> When spi_fsl_espi is chosen to be built as a module, there is a build
>> error because we test only CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI in declaration of
>> struct mpc8xxx_spi in drivers/spi/spi_fsl_lib.h.
>> 
>> We need to add a test for CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI_MODULE too.
>> 
>> The error looks like:
>> drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.c: In function 'fsl_espi_bufs':
>> drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.c:232: error: 'struct mpc8xxx_spi' has no member named 'len'
>> ...
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h |    2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
>> index cbe881b..97968de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h
>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct mpc8xxx_spi {
>> 	/* rx & tx bufs from the spi_transfer */
>> 	const void *tx;
>> 	void *rx;
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI) || defined(CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI_MODULE)
>> 	int len;
>> #endif
> 
> Oh, and there are still link errors:
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_tx_buf_u32" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_rx_buf_u32" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_tx_buf_u16" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_rx_buf_u16" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_tx_buf_u8" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_rx_buf_u8" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "of_mpc8xxx_spi_probe" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_strmode" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_probe" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_remove" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "to_of_pinfo" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_tx_buf_u32" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_rx_buf_u32" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "of_mpc8xxx_spi_probe" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_probe" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mpc8xxx_spi_remove" [drivers/spi/spi_fsl_espi.ko] undefined!
> 
> The functions are not exported...
> 
> Should I export all those or deny CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI=m?

I'd just deny CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI=m, unless you have some need for it to be a module.

- k
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-24  7:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-23  7:59 [PATCH] SPI: fix build with CONFIG_SPI_FSL_ESPI=m Jiri Slaby
2011-08-23  8:49 ` Jiri Slaby
     [not found]   ` <4E5369A0.4080701-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-24  7:22     ` Kumar Gala

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).