Re: [PATCH v2] staging: media: atomisp: pci: Format comments according to coding-style in file atomisp_cmd.c

[ascordeiro <alinesantanacordeiro@gmail.com>]

Em qui, 2021-04-15 às 08:48 +0300, Dan Carpenter escreveu:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:42:44PM -0300, Aline Santana Cordeiro
> wrote:
> > @@ -90,18 +92,14 @@ struct camera_mipi_info
> > *atomisp_to_sensor_mipi_info(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> >         return (struct camera_mipi_info
> > *)v4l2_get_subdev_hostdata(sd);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * get struct atomisp_video_pipe from v4l2 video_device
> > - */
> > +/* get struct atomisp_video_pipe from v4l2 video_device */
> 
> This code is obvious and the comment doesn't add anything except
> noise.
> Just delete it.  Same for a lot of the other one line comments
> describing functions in this patch.
> 

No worries, I'm going to delete it all.
Can I send a v3 just with the issues detected by checkpatch?

Thank you in advance,
Aline

> >  struct atomisp_video_pipe *atomisp_to_video_pipe(struct
> > video_device *dev)
> >  {
> >         return (struct atomisp_video_pipe *)
> >                container_of(dev, struct atomisp_video_pipe, vdev);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * get struct atomisp_acc_pipe from v4l2 video_device
> > - */
> > +/* get struct atomisp_acc_pipe from v4l2 video_device */
> >  struct atomisp_acc_pipe *atomisp_to_acc_pipe(struct video_device
> > *dev)
> >  {
> >         return (struct atomisp_acc_pipe *)
> > @@ -269,7 +267,7 @@ int atomisp_freq_scaling(struct atomisp_device
> > *isp,
> >                             ATOMISP_RUN_MODE_CONTINUOUS_CAPTURE;
> >         }
> >  
> > -       /* search for the target frequency by looping freq rules*/
> > +       /* search for the target frequency by looping freq rules */
> >         for (i = 0; i < dfs->dfs_table_size; i++) {
> >                 if (curr_rules.width != dfs->dfs_table[i].width &&
> >                     dfs->dfs_table[i].width != ISP_FREQ_RULE_ANY)
> > @@ -307,9 +305,7 @@ int atomisp_freq_scaling(struct atomisp_device
> > *isp,
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * reset and restore ISP
> > - */
> > +/* reset and restore ISP */
> 
> Obvious
> 
> >  int atomisp_reset(struct atomisp_device *isp)
> >  {
> >         /* Reset ISP by power-cycling it */
> > @@ -338,9 +334,7 @@ int atomisp_reset(struct atomisp_device *isp)
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * interrupt disable functions
> > - */
> > +/* interrupt disable functions */
> 
> Obvious
> 
> >  static void disable_isp_irq(enum hrt_isp_css_irq irq)
> >  {
> >         irq_disable_channel(IRQ0_ID, irq);
> > @@ -351,9 +345,7 @@ static void disable_isp_irq(enum
> > hrt_isp_css_irq irq)
> >         cnd_sp_irq_enable(SP0_ID, false);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * interrupt clean function
> > - */
> > +/* interrupt clean function */
> 
> Obvious
> 
> >  static void clear_isp_irq(enum hrt_isp_css_irq irq)
> >  {
> >         irq_clear_all(IRQ0_ID);
> 
> [ snip ]
> 
> > @@ -1918,10 +1914,7 @@ irqreturn_t atomisp_isr_thread(int irq, void
> > *isp_ptr)
> >         return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * utils for buffer allocation/free
> > - */
> > -
> > +/* utils for buffer allocation/free */
> 
> What?  This one seems actively wrong.
> 
> >  int atomisp_get_frame_pgnr(struct atomisp_device *isp,
> >                            const struct ia_css_frame *frame, u32
> > *p_pgnr)
> >  {
> 
> etc.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>