Re: [PATCH v8 08/10] gpu: host1x: mipi: Keep MIPI clock enabled till calibration is done

[Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>]

On 8/6/20 9:41 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>
> On 8/6/20 9:10 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 06.08.2020 18:59, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>> ...
>>>>> Confirmed from HW designer, calibration FSM to finish takes worst 
>>>>> case
>>>>> 72uS so by the time it gets to sensor stream it will be done its
>>>>> sequence and will be waiting for DONE bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> So disabling MIPI CAL clock on sensor stream fails is safe.
>>>> 72us is quite a lot of time, what will happen if LP-11 happens before
>>>> FSM finished calibration?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the finish_calibration() needs to split into two parts:
>>>>
>>>>    1. wait for CAL_STATUS_ACTIVE before enabling sensor
>>>>    2. wait for CAL_STATUS_DONE after enabling sensor
>>> I don't think we need to split for active and done. Active will be 1 as
>>> long as other pads are in calibration as well.
>>>
>>> We cant use active status check for specific pads under calibration.
>>> This is common bit for all pads.
>> Does hardware have a single FSM block shared by all pads or there is FSM
>> per group of pads?
>
> MIPI CAL status register has DONE bits for individual pads status and 
> single ACTIVE bit.
>
> ACTIVE bit set to 1 indicates auto calibration is active which is the 
> case even when other pads (other CSI pads from other ports streaming 
> in case of parallel stream) are under calibration. Also DSI is shared 
> as well.
>
> We do calibration for individual pads. So, we should not rely on 
> ACTIVE bit.
>
>
> MIPI driver checks for condition ACTIVE == 1 && DONE == 1 from the 
> beginning.
>
> But I think this also should be fixed as in case of parallel streams 
> calibration can happen in parallel waiting for ACTIVE to be cleared 
> makes all calibration callers to wait for longer than needed as ACTIVE 
> is common for all pads.
>
>>
>>> Unfortunately HW don't have separate status indicating when sequence is
>>> done to indicate its waiting for LP11.
>>>
>>>
>>> To avoid all this, will remove cancel_calibration() totally and use 
>>> same
>>> finish calibration even in case of stream failure then.
>>>
>> What about to add 72us delay to the end of start_calibration() in order
>> to ensure that FSM is finished before LP-11?
>
> Why we should add 72uS in start_calibration() when can use same 
> finish_calibration() for both pass/fail cases?
>
> Only timing loose we see is in case of failure we still wait for 250ms 
> and as this is failing case I hope should be ok.
>
Also as we don't need cancel_calibration(), keeping tegra_mipi_wait() 
like earlier makes sense I believe as we are letting it finish going 
thru sequence.

So I think below are fixes,

1. Existing MIPI driver, tegra_mipi_wait() to not use status ACTIVE bit 
to be 0 and use only DONE bit to be 1 for wait condition  as we are 
calibrating separately for individual pads and this ACTIVE bit is common 
for all pads where it will not be 0 in case of other parallel streams 
which may also be under calibration.

2. No need for separate cancel_calibration. So, probably earlier names 
tegra_mipi_calibrate() and tegra_mipi_wait() hols good as we are waiting 
for calibration sequence to finish irrespective of fail/pass.