* Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors
[not found] <20201005025720.2599682-1-keescook@chromium.org>
@ 2020-10-05 17:36 ` Nick Desaulniers
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nick Desaulniers @ 2020-10-05 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Stephen Rothwell, Arnd Bergmann, clang-built-linux,
linux-arch, LKML, linux-toolchains, Segher Boessenkool
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:57 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Under some circumstances, the compiler generates .ctors.* sections. This
> is seen doing a cross compile of x86_64 from a powerpc64el host:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.ctors.65435' from `kernel/trace/trace_clock.o' being
> placed in section `.ctors.65435'
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.ctors.65435' from `kernel/trace/ftrace.o' being
> placed in section `.ctors.65435'
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.ctors.65435' from `kernel/trace/ring_buffer.o' being
> placed in section `.ctors.65435'
>
> Include these orphans along with the regular .ctors section.
It's very curious to see different behavior based on whether one is
targeting x86_64 via native compilation vs cross compilation.
Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Fixes: 83109d5d5fba ("x86/build: Warn on orphan section placement")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> v2: brown paper bag version: fix whitespace for proper backslash alignment
> ---
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> index 5430febd34be..b83c00c63997 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> @@ -684,6 +684,7 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS
> #define KERNEL_CTORS() . = ALIGN(8); \
> __ctors_start = .; \
> + KEEP(*(SORT(.ctors.*))) \
> KEEP(*(.ctors)) \
> KEEP(*(SORT(.init_array.*))) \
> KEEP(*(.init_array)) \
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread