From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
To: "miklos" <miklos@szeredi.hu>, "jack" <jack@suse.cz>,
"amir73il" <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-unionfs" <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chengguang Xu" <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
Subject: 回复:[RFC PATCH v4 0/9] implement containerized syncfs for overlayfs
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 22:49:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1762e3a7bce.e28cb82145070.9060345012556073676@mykernel.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201113065555.147276-1-cgxu519@mykernel.net>
---- 在 星期五, 2020-11-13 14:55:46 Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net> 撰写 ----
> Current syncfs(2) syscall on overlayfs just calls sync_filesystem()
> on upper_sb to synchronize whole dirty inodes in upper filesystem
> regardless of the overlay ownership of the inode. In the use case of
> container, when multiple containers using the same underlying upper
> filesystem, it has some shortcomings as below.
>
> (1) Performance
> Synchronization is probably heavy because it actually syncs unnecessary
> inodes for target overlayfs.
>
> (2) Interference
> Unplanned synchronization will probably impact IO performance of
> unrelated container processes on the other overlayfs.
>
> This series try to implement containerized syncfs for overlayfs so that
> only sync target dirty upper inodes which are belong to specific overlayfs
> instance. By doing this, it is able to reduce cost of synchronization and
> will not seriously impact IO performance of unrelated processes.
Hi Miklos,
I think this version has addressed all previous issues and comments from Jack
and Amir. Have you got time to review this patch series?
Thanks,
Chengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-04 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-13 6:55 [RFC PATCH v4 0/9] implement containerized syncfs for overlayfs Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/9] ovl: setup overlayfs' private bdi Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/9] ovl: implement ->writepages operation Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/9] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->evict_inode operation Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/9] ovl: mark overlayfs' inode dirty on modification Chengguang Xu
2021-04-09 13:45 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-04-12 11:58 ` Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/9] ovl: mark overlayfs' inode dirty on shared mmap Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/9] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->write_inode operation Chengguang Xu
2021-04-09 13:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-04-14 6:14 ` Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/9] ovl: cache dirty overlayfs' inode Chengguang Xu
2021-04-09 13:50 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-04-13 2:14 ` Chengguang Xu
2021-04-13 8:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-04-14 5:53 ` Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/9] fs: export wait_sb_inodes() Chengguang Xu
2020-11-13 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v4 9/9] ovl: implement containerized syncfs for overlayfs Chengguang Xu
2021-04-09 13:51 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-04-12 12:24 ` Chengguang Xu
2021-04-12 14:22 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-12-04 14:49 ` Chengguang Xu [this message]
2020-12-04 15:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/9] " Miklos Szeredi
2020-12-04 16:40 ` 回复:[RFC " Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1762e3a7bce.e28cb82145070.9060345012556073676@mykernel.net \
--to=cgxu519@mykernel.net \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).