linux-unionfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] capability conversion fixes
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:39:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvY1ckAfR0c-RtzeBSaR8_dM2CV1MD_xJr=A6+MkSXi9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2go8wg9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:15 PM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > It turns out overlayfs is actually okay wrt. mutliple conversions, because
> > it uses the right context for lower operations.  I.e. before calling
> > vfs_{set,get}xattr() on underlying fs, it overrides creds with that of the
> > mounter, so the current user ns will now match that of
> > overlay_sb->s_user_ns, meaning that the caps will be converted to just the
> > right format for the next layer
> >
> > OTOH ecryptfs, which is the only other one affected by commit 7c03e2cda4a5
> > ("vfs: move cap_convert_nscap() call into vfs_setxattr()") needs to be
> > fixed up, since it doesn't do the cap override thing that overlayfs does.
> >
> > I don't have an ecryptfs setup, so untested, but it's a fairly trivial
> > change.
> >
> > My other observation was that cap_inode_getsecurity() messes up conversion
> > of caps in more than one case.  This is independent of the overlayfs user
> > ns enablement but affects it as well.
> >
> > Maybe we can revisit the infrastructure improvements we discussed, but I
> > think these fixes are more appropriate for the current cycle.
>
> I mostly agree.  Fixing the bugs in a back-portable way is important.
>
> However we need to sort out the infrastructure, and implementation.
>
> As far as I can tell it is only the fact that overlayfs does not support
> the new mount api aka fs_context that allows this fix to work and be
> correct.
>
> I believe the new mount api would allow specifying a different userns
> thatn curent_user_ns for the overlay filesystem and that would break
> this.

This is a valid concern.   I'll add a WARN_ON() to make sure that
whenever this changes it doesn't go unnoticed.

Fixing it would also be easy:  just update creds->user_ns field to
that of sb->s_user_ns in ovl_fill_super().   For now I'll go with the
WARNING though, since this cannot be tested.

Thanks,
Miklos

      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 16:22 [PATCH 0/2] capability conversion fixes Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] ecryptfs: fix uid translation for setxattr on security.capability Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-19 21:06   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-20  7:52     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-22 16:04       ` Tyler Hicks
2021-01-22 18:31   ` Tyler Hicks
2021-01-25 13:25     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-25 13:46       ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-26  1:52       ` Tyler Hicks
2021-01-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] security.capability: fix conversions on getxattr Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-20  1:34   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-20  7:58     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-28 16:58     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2021-01-28 20:19       ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-28 20:38         ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-28 20:49           ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]         ` <20210129154839.GC1130@mail.hallyn.com>
2021-01-29 22:55           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-30  2:06             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2021-01-31 18:14               ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]       ` <CAJfpegt34fO8tUw8R2_ZxxKHBdBO_-quf+-f3N8aZmS=1oRdvQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <20210129153807.GA1130@mail.hallyn.com>
2021-01-29 23:11           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-30  2:04             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2021-01-20 19:37   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-20 21:08   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-19 21:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] capability conversion fixes Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-20  7:39   ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJfpegvY1ckAfR0c-RtzeBSaR8_dM2CV1MD_xJr=A6+MkSXi9A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=code@tyhicks.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).