From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
To: Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>
Cc: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ecryptfs: fix uid translation for setxattr on security.capability
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:46:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKd04WaFjM1=qyUVnxwM9k_4Mc=OvvuCeN9HvYJnq91wWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOssrKd-P=4n-nzhjnvnChbCkcrAaLC=NjmCTDRHtzRtzJaU-g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:25 PM Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:31 PM Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-01-19 17:22:03, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > Prior to commit 7c03e2cda4a5 ("vfs: move cap_convert_nscap() call into
> > > vfs_setxattr()") the translation of nscap->rootid did not take stacked
> > > filesystems (overlayfs and ecryptfs) into account.
> > >
> > > That patch fixed the overlay case, but made the ecryptfs case worse.
> >
> > Thanks for sending a fix!
> >
> > I know that you don't have an eCryptfs setup to test with but I'm at a
> > loss about how to test this from the userns/fscaps side of things. Do
> > you have a sequence of unshare/setcap/getcap commands that I can run on
> > a file inside of an eCryptfs mount to verify that the bug exists after
> > 7c03e2cda4a5 and then again to verify that this patch fixes the bug?
>
> You need two terminals:
> $ = <USER>
> # = root
>
> $ unshare -Um
> $ echo $$
> <PID>
> # echo "0 1000 1" > uid_map
NOTE: <USER> is assumed to have uid=1000, so this and following
"1000" values need to be fixed up if it's not the case.
Thanks,
Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 16:22 [PATCH 0/2] capability conversion fixes Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] ecryptfs: fix uid translation for setxattr on security.capability Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-19 21:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-20 7:52 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-22 16:04 ` Tyler Hicks
2021-01-22 18:31 ` Tyler Hicks
2021-01-25 13:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-25 13:46 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2021-01-26 1:52 ` Tyler Hicks
2021-01-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] security.capability: fix conversions on getxattr Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-20 1:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-20 7:58 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-28 16:58 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2021-01-28 20:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-28 20:38 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-28 20:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <20210129154839.GC1130@mail.hallyn.com>
2021-01-29 22:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-30 2:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2021-01-31 18:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <CAJfpegt34fO8tUw8R2_ZxxKHBdBO_-quf+-f3N8aZmS=1oRdvQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20210129153807.GA1130@mail.hallyn.com>
2021-01-29 23:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-30 2:04 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2021-01-20 19:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-20 21:08 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-19 21:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] capability conversion fixes Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-20 7:39 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOssrKd04WaFjM1=qyUVnxwM9k_4Mc=OvvuCeN9HvYJnq91wWA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).