From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc: "Juergen E . Fischer" <fischer@norbit.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jim Gill <jgill@vmware.com>, Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] scsi: aha152x: use sg helper to operate scatterlist
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:14:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617011426.GB20122@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1906141931070.65@nippy.intranet>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 08:36:38PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Ming Lei wrote:
>
> >
> > Follows the fixed version, could you review again?
> >
> > From f03484d4bac083c39d70665cfbadb641093b63de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:37:35 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] scsi: aha152x: use sg helper to operate scatterlist
> >
> > Use the scatterlist iterators and remove direct indexing of the
> > scatterlist array.
> >
> > This way allows us to pre-allocate one small scatterlist, which can be
> > chained with one runtime allocated scatterlist if the pre-allocated one
> > isn't enough for the whole request.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/aha152x.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aha152x.c b/drivers/scsi/aha152x.c
> > index 97872838b983..7faecdefda56 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/aha152x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/aha152x.c
> > @@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ static void datai_run(struct Scsi_Host *shpnt)
> > CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffers_residual > 0) {
> > /* advance to next buffer */
> > CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffers_residual--;
> > - CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer++;
> > + CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer = sg_next(CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer);
> > CURRENT_SC->SCp.ptr = SG_ADDRESS(CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer);
> > CURRENT_SC->SCp.this_residual = CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer->length;
> > }
> > @@ -2139,7 +2139,7 @@ static void datao_run(struct Scsi_Host *shpnt)
> > if(CURRENT_SC->SCp.this_residual==0 && CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffers_residual>0) {
> > /* advance to next buffer */
> > CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffers_residual--;
> > - CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer++;
> > + CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer = sg_next(CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer);
> > CURRENT_SC->SCp.ptr = SG_ADDRESS(CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer);
> > CURRENT_SC->SCp.this_residual = CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer->length;
> > }
> > @@ -2158,22 +2158,28 @@ static void datao_run(struct Scsi_Host *shpnt)
> > static void datao_end(struct Scsi_Host *shpnt)
> > {
> > if(TESTLO(DMASTAT, DFIFOEMP)) {
> > - int data_count = (DATA_LEN - scsi_get_resid(CURRENT_SC)) -
> > - GETSTCNT();
> > + int done = GETSTCNT();
> > + int data_count = (DATA_LEN - scsi_get_resid(CURRENT_SC)) - done;
>
> I think that's better than my suggestion.
>
> > + struct scatterlist *sg = scsi_sglist(CURRENT_SC);
> > + int i;
> >
> > CMD_INC_RESID(CURRENT_SC, data_count);
> >
> > - data_count -= CURRENT_SC->SCp.ptr -
> > - SG_ADDRESS(CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer);
> > - while(data_count>0) {
> > - CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer--;
> > - CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffers_residual++;
> > - data_count -= CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer->length;
> > + /*
> > + * rewind where we have done, and we have to start from
> > + * the beginning
> > + */
>
> How about, "Locate the first SG entry not yet sent".
OK.
>
> We could use sg_nents_for_len() but it returns a count of sg entries not a
> scatterlist pointer so it's not very helpful here.
>
> > + for (i = 0; done > 0 && !sg_is_last(sg); i++, sg = sg_next(sg)) {
> > + if (done < sg->length)
> > + break;
> > + done -= sg->length;
> > }
> > - CURRENT_SC->SCp.ptr = SG_ADDRESS(CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer) -
> > - data_count;
> > - CURRENT_SC->SCp.this_residual = CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer->length +
> > - data_count;
> > +
> > + CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffers_residual = i;
>
> Contradicting my previous email, that's still not right. I think it would
> have to be,
>
> CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffers_residual = scsi_sg_count(CURRENT_SC) - i;
Right, my fault.
>
> But we could remove all references to SCp.buffers_residual, like I did in
> patch 15/15 for NCR5380.c.
>
> > + CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer = sg;
> > + CURRENT_SC->SCp.ptr = SG_ADDRESS(CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer) + done;
> > + CURRENT_SC->SCp.this_residual = CURRENT_SC->SCp.buffer->length -
> > + done;
> > }
> >
> > SETPORT(SXFRCTL0, CH1|CLRCH1|CLRSTCNT);
> >
>
> What do you think of the revised patch below?
Looks fine, I will include it in V4.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-14 2:53 [PATCH V3 00/15] use sg helper to operate scatterlist Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 01/15] scsi: vmw_pscsi: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 02/15] scsi: advansys: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 03/15] scsi: lpfc: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 04/15] scsi: mvumi: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 05/15] scsi: ipr: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 06/15] scsi: pmcraid: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 07/15] usb: image: microtek: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 5:39 ` Finn Thain
2019-06-14 6:57 ` Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 08/15] staging: unisys: visorhba: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 5:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 09/15] s390: zfcp_fc: " Ming Lei
2019-06-16 16:25 ` Benjamin Block
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 10/15] scsi: aha152x: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 5:27 ` Finn Thain
2019-06-14 8:17 ` Ming Lei
2019-06-14 10:36 ` Finn Thain
2019-06-17 1:14 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 11/15] scsi: imm: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 12/15] scsi: pcmcia: nsp_cs: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 13/15] scsi: ppa: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 14/15] scsi: wd33c93: " Ming Lei
2019-06-14 2:53 ` [PATCH V3 15/15] NCR5380: Support chained sg lists Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190617011426.GB20122@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=fischer@norbit.de \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jgill@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).