[PATCH 2/2] USB: cdc-acm: fix rounding error in TIOCSSERIAL

* [PATCH 2/2] USB: cdc-acm: fix rounding error in TIOCSSERIAL
@ 2020-03-05 10:24 Anthony Mallet
  2020-03-05 10:35 ` Oliver Neukum
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Mallet @ 2020-03-05 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oliver Neukum, linux-usb

By default, tty_port_init() initializes those parameters to a multiple
of HZ. For instance in line 69 of tty_port.c:
   port->close_delay = (50 * HZ) / 100;
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/tty/tty_port.c#L69

With e.g. CONFIG_HZ = 250 (as this is the case for Ubuntu 18.04
linux-image-4.15.0-37-generic), the default setting for close_delay is
thus 125.

When ioctl(fd, TIOCGSERIAL, &s) is executed, the setting returned in
user space is '12' (125/10). When ioctl(fd, TIOCSSERIAL, &s) is then
executed with the same setting '12', the value is interpreted as '120'
which is different from the current setting and a EPERM error may be
raised by set_serial_info() if !CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c#L919

Signed-off-by: Anthony Mallet <anthony.mallet@laas.fr>
Fixes: ba2d8ce9db0a6 ("cdc-acm: implement TIOCSSERIAL to avoid blocking close(2)")
---
 drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
index da619176d..b43820fb2 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
@@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ static int set_serial_info(struct tty_struct *tty, struct serial_struct *ss)
 {
 	struct acm *acm = tty->driver_data;
 	unsigned int closing_wait, close_delay;
+	unsigned int old_closing_wait, old_close_delay;
 	int retval = 0;
 
 	close_delay = msecs_to_jiffies(ss->close_delay * 10);
@@ -914,18 +915,24 @@ static int set_serial_info(struct tty_struct *tty, struct serial_struct *ss)
 			ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE :
 			msecs_to_jiffies(ss->closing_wait * 10);
 
+	/* we must redo the rounding here, so that the values match */
+	old_close_delay	= jiffies_to_msecs(acm->port.close_delay) / 10;
+	old_closing_wait = acm->port.closing_wait == ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE ?
+				ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE :
+				jiffies_to_msecs(acm->port.closing_wait) / 10;
+
 	mutex_lock(&acm->port.mutex);
 
-	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
-		if ((close_delay != acm->port.close_delay) ||
-		    (closing_wait != acm->port.closing_wait))
+	if ((ss->close_delay != old_close_delay) ||
+            (ss->closing_wait != old_closing_wait)) {
+		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
 			retval = -EPERM;
-		else
-			retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	} else {
-		acm->port.close_delay  = close_delay;
-		acm->port.closing_wait = closing_wait;
-	}
+		else {
+			acm->port.close_delay  = close_delay;
+			acm->port.closing_wait = closing_wait;
+		}
+	} else
+		retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	mutex_unlock(&acm->port.mutex);
 	return retval;
@@ -969,7 +976,7 @@ static int wait_serial_change(struct acm *acm, unsigned long arg)
 		}
 	} while (!rv);
 
-	
+
 
 	return rv;
 }
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread