From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
To: "stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"balbi@kernel.org" <balbi@kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] Revert "usb: udc: allow adding and removing the same gadget device"
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 03:40:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820033903.GA24349@b29397-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200819145236.GA181847@rowland.harvard.edu>
On 20-08-19 10:52:36, stern@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 01:31:14AM +0000, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On 20-08-18 10:46:55, stern@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:05:51AM +0000, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c index 473e74088b1f..43351b0af569
> > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
> > > > > > @@ -1386,7 +1386,6 @@ void usb_del_gadget_udc(struct usb_gadget
> > > > > > *gadget) {
> > > > > > usb_del_gadget(gadget);
> > > > > > usb_put_gadget(gadget);
> > > > > > - memset(&gadget->dev, 0x00, sizeof(gadget->dev));
> > > > >
> > > > > Shouldn't you do this patch earlier in the series, as the
> > > > > usb_put_gadget() call could have freed the memory that is being cleared here?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I did it earlier, it would cause dwc3 break if people do 'git bisect', dwc3 issue is
> > > > fixed at patch 5.
> > >
> > > If you use the patch I posted earlier:
> > >
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmarc.info%2F%3Fl%3Dlinux-usb%26m%3D159605415210351%26w%3D2&data=02%7C01%7Cpeter.chen%40nxp.com%7Cac0a92404ea34c230dd208d8444f83d3%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637334455595715503&sdata=whweZozRiWD%2B4iRFz7zvEahWAqQYkQQ8tHlRSiU%2Fj7I%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > instead of this one then dwc3 would continue to work correctly during
> > > the intermediate stages of the series.
> > >
> >
> > But at last, we don't want below at .release function
> >
> > memset(dev, 0, sizeof(*dev));
> >
> > It still needs another patch to delete it after dwc3 changes,
> > and it changes .release function name to usb_udc_zero_release,
> > this change may also not be needed.
> >
> > Or I only do move memory clear operation at the first patch, and
> > delete it at the last patch, it could let the reader not see
> > the memory clear operation at the usb_del_gadget during the patch
> > series.
>
> One way or another, the existing code is wrong. I guess the best we can
> do for now is to let it remain wrong during the patch series, rather
> than changing it to be wrong in a different way.
>
> To put it another way, we already run the risk of clearing memory that
> has been freed. The series does not make that risk any worse, and it
> eventually fixes the problem.
>
> This means your patch should remain in its position at the end of the
> series.
>
Thank.
If you think my sequence during the patch series is OK, would you
please add your reviewed-by below?
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg199291.html
--
Thanks,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-20 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 2:25 [PATCH v2 0/6] USB: UDC: Fix memory leaks by expanding the API Peter Chen
2020-08-10 2:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] USB: UDC: Expand device model API interface Peter Chen
2020-08-10 2:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] USB: UDC: net2280: Fix memory leaks Peter Chen
2020-08-10 2:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] USB: UDC: net2272: " Peter Chen
2020-08-10 2:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] usb: cdns3: gadget: fix possible memory leak Peter Chen
2020-08-10 2:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] usb: dwc3: allocate gadget structure dynamically Peter Chen
2020-08-10 2:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Revert "usb: udc: allow adding and removing the same gadget device" Peter Chen
2020-08-18 9:33 ` Greg KH
2020-08-18 10:05 ` Peter Chen
2020-08-18 14:46 ` stern
2020-08-19 1:31 ` Peter Chen
2020-08-19 14:52 ` stern
2020-08-20 3:40 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2020-08-20 14:25 ` stern
2020-08-18 9:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] USB: UDC: Fix memory leaks by expanding the API Greg KH
2020-08-18 10:07 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200820033903.GA24349@b29397-desktop \
--to=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).