linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
	USB mailing list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Disconnect race in Gadget core
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 17:37:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512093748.GA17479@nchen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511191538.GC908414@rowland.harvard.edu>

On 21-05-11 15:15:38, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:53:22AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> > 
> > I fixed a similar issue for configfs, see 1a1c851bbd70
> > ("usb: gadget: configfs: fix concurrent issue between composite APIs")
> 
> Yes, I see.  That is indeed the very same problem.
> 
> > It doesn't prevent disconnect callback, the disconnect callback will check
> > if unbind has called. The same for .setup and .suspend. Did you see
> > issues using configfs or legacy gadget? For legacy gadget, just like you said
> > it is the second disconnect callback is called during the removal process,
> > the first is called at usb_gadget_disconnect. It is not easy to prevent disconnect
> > occurring, we could add some logic at composite_disconnect, and let it quit if it is
> > called the second time.
> 
> I haven't seen the race occur in operation.  It was only theoretical; I 
> noticed it while thinking about one of the commits that was just merged 
> into the -stable kernels.
> 
> > It is hard to avoid usb_gadget_driver callback until usb_gadget_udc_stop has called,
> > no matter bad hardware or threaded interrupts, my former solution is avoid
> > dereferenced pointer issue, most of callbacks handling are useless if the gadget has already
> > unbind, the only meaningful callback is disconnect, and we have already called it
> > at usb_gadget_disconnect
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> I suppose we could do something similar for the composite driver, for 
> gadgets that don't use configfs.

Originally, I intended to do at composite.c to cover all gadget drivers, but
I can't find a good way to use usb_composite_dev existing spinlock to do that.
Since most of users already used configfs, I chose to fix it at configfs directly.
If we want to fix it for legacy gadget drivers (drivers at drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/).

For .setup & .suspend, we could delay 10ms after usb_gadget_disconnect, ensure
hardware has triggered related interrupt, and we need to let all UDC drivers to
add udc->gadget->irq, in that case, the pending threaded interrupt will be handled
at synchronize_irq at usb_gadget_remove_driver.
For .disconnect, we could use cdev->config to judge if the first .disconnect
has run.

> But what about legacy gadgets?  Are 
> there any still around that don't use either configfs or the composite 
> framework?

I only find raw_gadget.c that doesn't use composite framework, and it doesn't implement
many usb_gadget_driver callbacks, eg, .disconnect and .suspend. For .setup, we could
use above solutions for legacy composite driver.

-- 

Thanks,
Peter Chen


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10 15:24 Disconnect race in Gadget core Alan Stern
2021-05-10 16:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-10 19:38   ` Alan Stern
2021-05-11  2:53     ` Peter Chen
2021-05-11 19:15       ` Alan Stern
2021-05-12  9:37         ` Peter Chen [this message]
2021-05-12  9:41           ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-12 19:33           ` Alan Stern
2021-05-11  8:22     ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-11 21:26       ` Alan Stern
2021-05-12  7:00         ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-12 15:33           ` Alan Stern
2021-05-14  7:35             ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-14 16:58               ` Alan Stern
2021-05-15  6:41                 ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-15 15:31                   ` Alan Stern
2021-05-16  9:43                     ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-16 14:51                       ` Alan Stern
2021-05-17  2:00                         ` Peter Chen
2021-05-17  5:33                           ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-17  5:35                         ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210512093748.GA17479@nchen \
    --to=peter.chen@kernel.org \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).