linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>
To: valentina.manea.m@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] usbip: eliminate duplicate code in vhci_device_unlink_cleanup
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 23:55:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210813182508.28127-3-mail@anirudhrb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210813182508.28127-1-mail@anirudhrb.com>

The cleanup code for unlink_tx and unlink_rx lists is almost the same.
So, extract it into a new function and call it for both unlink_rx and
unlink_tx.

Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>
---
 drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c | 57 ++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
index 6f3f374d4bbc..b142508b46ce 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
@@ -945,7 +945,8 @@ static int vhci_urb_dequeue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, int status)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
+static void vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(struct vhci_device *vdev,
+		struct list_head *unlink_list)
 {
 	struct vhci_hcd *vhci_hcd = vdev_to_vhci_hcd(vdev);
 	struct usb_hcd *hcd = vhci_hcd_to_hcd(vhci_hcd);
@@ -956,46 +957,15 @@ static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vhci->lock, flags);
 	spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(unlink, tmp, &vdev->unlink_tx, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(unlink, tmp, unlink_list, list) {
 		struct urb *urb;
 
-		/* give back urb of unsent unlink request */
-		pr_info("unlink cleanup tx %lu\n", unlink->unlink_seqnum);
-
-		urb = pickup_urb_and_free_priv(vdev, unlink->unlink_seqnum);
-		if (!urb) {
-			pr_info("the urb (seqnum %lu) was already given back\n",
-				unlink->unlink_seqnum);
-			list_del(&unlink->list);
-			kfree(unlink);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		urb->status = -ENODEV;
-
-		usb_hcd_unlink_urb_from_ep(hcd, urb);
-
-		list_del(&unlink->list);
-
-		spin_unlock(&vdev->priv_lock);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags);
-
-		usb_hcd_giveback_urb(hcd, urb, urb->status);
-
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&vhci->lock, flags);
-		spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
-
-		kfree(unlink);
-	}
-
-	while (!list_empty(&vdev->unlink_rx)) {
-		struct urb *urb;
-
-		unlink = list_first_entry(&vdev->unlink_rx, struct vhci_unlink,
-			list);
-
-		/* give back URB of unanswered unlink request */
-		pr_info("unlink cleanup rx %lu\n", unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+		if (unlink_list == &vdev->unlink_tx)
+			pr_info("unlink cleanup tx %lu\n",
+					unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+		else
+			pr_info("unlink_cleanup rx %lu\n",
+					unlink->unlink_seqnum);
 
 		urb = pickup_urb_and_free_priv(vdev, unlink->unlink_seqnum);
 		if (!urb) {
@@ -1027,6 +997,15 @@ static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags);
 }
 
+static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
+{
+	/* give back URB of unsent unlink request */
+	vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(vdev, &vdev->unlink_tx);
+
+	/* give back URB of unanswered unlink request */
+	vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(vdev, &vdev->unlink_rx);
+}
+
 /*
  * The important thing is that only one context begins cleanup.
  * This is why error handling and cleanup become simple.
-- 
2.26.2


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-13 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-13 18:25 [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix syzkaller bug: hung task in hub_port_init Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-08-13 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] usbip: give back URBs for unsent unlink requests during cleanup Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-08-17 23:16   ` Shuah Khan
2021-08-18  5:39     ` Greg KH
2021-08-18 18:36       ` Shuah Khan
2021-08-19 18:09         ` Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-08-19 18:49           ` Shuah Khan
2021-08-13 18:25 ` Anirudh Rayabharam [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210813182508.28127-3-mail@anirudhrb.com \
    --to=mail@anirudhrb.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usbip: eliminate duplicate code in vhci_device_unlink_cleanup' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).