* Need clarification regarding UASP gadget status in Linux kernel
@ 2019-10-10 3:48 Rahul Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rahul Kumar @ 2019-10-10 3:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-usb
Cc: Roger Quadros, Pawel Laszczak, Jayshri Dajiram Pawar,
Sanket Parmar, Sekhar Nori
Hi,
I am trying to test the UASP gadget based on f_tcm.c against Command Verifier in super-speed mode.
I would like to know whether anyone has had any luck in this regard.
However I see a lot of failures, due to lack of features in the function/f_tcm .c code. My understanding is that it doesn't support:
(1) Handling multiple commands in parallel. The current code waits for the first command to complete sending its response/status, before handling the next command. However in command verifier based tests, multiple commands are sent by the host, before the host sends PRIME on the status endpoint.
(2) Rejecting commands if illegal stream-id is presented, or other error scenarios.
(3) Handling of task management commands.
Regards,
Rahul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-10-10 3:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-10 3:48 Need clarification regarding UASP gadget status in Linux kernel Rahul Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).