From: "Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)" <Chunfeng.Yun@mediatek.com>
To: "ikjn@chromium.org" <ikjn@chromium.org>
Cc: "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"mathias.nyman@intel.com" <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
"Eddie Hung (洪正鑫)" <Eddie.Hung@mediatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] usb: xhci-mtk: update fs bus bandwidth by bw_budget_table
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 01:45:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daf21b34135d3463aeff7e0a6e416e91c577fabb.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAATdQgA9WeKr2UkrcAKY1rP22GtT0bMezdWkb-wyF9Yjx2p_9w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2021-08-04 at 22:06 +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 1:19 PM Chunfeng Yun <
> chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 14:05 +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> > > Hi Chunfeng,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 4:51 PM Chunfeng Yun <
> > > chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Use @bw_budget_table[] to update fs bus bandwidth due to
> > > > not all microframes consume @bw_cost_per_microframe, see
> > > > setup_sch_info().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c | 17 +++++++----------
> > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
> > > > b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
> > > > index 0bb1a6295d64..10c0f0f6461f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
> > > > @@ -458,8 +458,8 @@ static int check_fs_bus_bw(struct
> > > > mu3h_sch_ep_info *sch_ep, int offset)
> > > > * Compared with hs bus, no matter what ep
> > > > type,
> > > > * the hub will always delay one uframe to send
> > > > data
> > > > */
> > > > - for (j = 0; j < sch_ep->cs_count; j++) {
> > > > - tmp = tt->fs_bus_bw[base + j] + sch_ep-
> > > > >bw_cost_per_microframe;
> > > > + for (j = 0; j < sch_ep->num_budget_microframes;
> > > > j++) {
> > > > + tmp = tt->fs_bus_bw[base + j] + sch_ep-
> > > > >bw_budget_table[j];
> > > > if (tmp > FS_PAYLOAD_MAX)
> > > > return -ESCH_BW_OVERFLOW;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -534,21 +534,18 @@ static void update_sch_tt(struct
> > > > mu3h_sch_ep_info *sch_ep, bool used)
> > > > {
> > > > struct mu3h_sch_tt *tt = sch_ep->sch_tt;
> > > > u32 base, num_esit;
> > > > - int bw_updated;
> > > > int i, j;
> > > >
> > > > num_esit = XHCI_MTK_MAX_ESIT / sch_ep->esit;
> > > >
> > > > - if (used)
> > > > - bw_updated = sch_ep->bw_cost_per_microframe;
> > > > - else
> > > > - bw_updated = -sch_ep->bw_cost_per_microframe;
> > > > -
> > > > for (i = 0; i < num_esit; i++) {
> > > > base = sch_ep->offset + i * sch_ep->esit;
> > > >
> > > > - for (j = 0; j < sch_ep->cs_count; j++)
> > > > - tt->fs_bus_bw[base + j] += bw_updated;
> > > > + for (j = 0; j < sch_ep->num_budget_microframes;
> > > > j++)
> > > > + if (used)
> > > > + tt->fs_bus_bw[base + j] +=
> > > > sch_ep->bw_budget_table[j];
> > > > + else
> > > > + tt->fs_bus_bw[base + j] -=
> > > > sch_ep->bw_budget_table[j];
> > >
> > > I agree that xhci-mtk-sch still has more rooms for tt periodic
> > > bandwidth
> > > but I think this approach could trigger a problem.
> >
> > See updat_bus_bw(), when add fs ep's bandwidth, it uses
> > bw_budget_table[], so prefer to use the same way
> >
> > >
> > > for example, if there are two endpoints scheduled in the same u-
> > > frame index,
> > > * ep1out = iso 192bytes bw_budget_table[] = { 188, 188, 0, ...}
> > > --> y0
> > > * ep2in = int 64bytes, bw_budget_table[] = { 0, 0, 64, ... } -->
> > > y0
> > >
> > > (If this is possible allocation from this patch),
> > > I guess xhci-mtk could have some problems on internal scheduling?
> >
> > Test it on dvt env. don't encounter issues;
> >
>
> As you can see In the above example, this patch starts to allow that
> allocation.
> Do you mean that we don't have to worry about such a case (on all MTK
> platforms)?
No, that is another question, when update bus_bw[] and fs_bus_bw[] for
FS with TT should use the same bw_budget_table[] which is filled in
setup_sch_info(). If the bw_budget_table[] is something wrong, we can
prepare new patch to fix it.
>
> thanks
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if (used)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.18.0
> > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-10 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-30 8:49 [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: add support property 'tpl-support' Chunfeng Yun
2021-07-30 8:49 ` [PATCH 02/11] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: add optional property to disable usb2 ports Chunfeng Yun
2021-08-06 20:41 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-11 8:12 ` Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)
2021-07-30 8:49 ` [PATCH 03/11] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: add compatible for mt8195 Chunfeng Yun
2021-08-06 20:43 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-11 8:02 ` Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)
2021-08-18 14:20 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-19 11:36 ` Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)
2021-07-30 8:49 ` [PATCH 04/11] usb: xhci-mtk: fix use-after-free of mtk->hcd Chunfeng Yun
2021-08-13 5:26 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-07-30 8:49 ` [PATCH 05/11] usb: xhci-mtk: add support 'tpl-support' Chunfeng Yun
2021-07-30 8:49 ` [PATCH 06/11] usb: xhci-mtk: support option to disable usb2 ports Chunfeng Yun
2021-07-30 8:49 ` [PATCH 07/11] usb: xhci-mtk: fix issue of out-of-bounds array access Chunfeng Yun
2021-07-30 8:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] usb: xhci-mtk: update fs bus bandwidth by bw_budget_table Chunfeng Yun
2021-08-03 6:05 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-08-04 5:19 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-08-04 14:06 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-08-10 1:45 ` Chunfeng Yun (云春峰) [this message]
2021-07-30 8:50 ` [PATCH 09/11] usb: xhci-mtk: check boundary before check tt Chunfeng Yun
2021-08-09 7:32 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-08-11 8:18 ` Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)
2021-07-30 8:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] usb: xhci-mtk: add a member of num_esit Chunfeng Yun
2021-07-30 8:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] usb: xhci-mtk: modify the SOF/ITP interval for mt8195 Chunfeng Yun
2021-08-06 20:37 ` [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: add support property 'tpl-support' Rob Herring
2021-08-11 7:54 ` Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)
2021-08-12 2:28 ` Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daf21b34135d3463aeff7e0a6e416e91c577fabb.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=Eddie.Hung@mediatek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ikjn@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).