From: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@st.com>
To: <wim@linux-watchdog.org>, <linux@roeck-us.net>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Cc: <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>, <christophe.roullier@st.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers: watchdog: stm32_iwdg: set WDOG_HW_RUNNING at probe
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:24:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122082442.21695-1-christophe.roullier@st.com> (raw)
If the watchdog hardware is already enabled during the boot process,
when the Linux watchdog driver loads, it should start/reset the watchdog
and tell the watchdog framework. As a result, ping can be generated from
the watchdog framework (if CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED is set),
until the userspace watchdog daemon takes over control
Fixes:4332d113c66a ("watchdog: Add STM32 IWDG driver")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@st.com>
---
Changes since v1:
According to Guenter
I follow the guidance from intel-mid_wdt.c
and I added test to check if CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED is set
because we need to be flexible (depends on customer config, but watchdog
not always start by bootloader (Uboot, ..))
I've tested some config and it is working as expected:
Watchdog enable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE is not set + daemon watchdog in userland ON ==> No reset IWDG2
Watchdog enable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE is not set ==> Reset IWDG2
Watchdog enable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y ==> No reset IWDG2
Watchdog enable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y + daemon watchdog in userland ON puis OFF ==> Reset IWDG2
Watchdog disable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE is not set ==> No reset IWDG2
Watchdog disable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y ==> No reset IWDG2
Watchdog disable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y + daemon watchdog in userland ON ==> No reset IWDG2
Watchdog disable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y + daemon watchdog in userland ON puis OFF ==> Reset IWDG2
Thanks,
Christophe
drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c b/drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c
index a3a329011a06..7f454a6e17ba 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@
#define TIMEOUT_US 100000
#define SLEEP_US 1000
+static bool handle_boot_enabled =
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED);
+
struct stm32_iwdg_data {
bool has_pclk;
u32 max_prescaler;
@@ -262,6 +265,24 @@ static int stm32_iwdg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
watchdog_set_nowayout(wdd, WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT);
watchdog_init_timeout(wdd, 0, dev);
+ /*
+ * In case of CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED is set
+ * (Means U-Boot/bootloaders leaves the watchdog running)
+ * When we get here we should make a decision to prevent
+ * any side effects before user space daemon will take care of it.
+ * The best option, taking into consideration that there is no
+ * way to read values back from hardware, is to enforce watchdog
+ * being run with deterministic values.
+ */
+ if (handle_boot_enabled) {
+ ret = stm32_iwdg_start(wdd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Make sure the watchdog is serviced */
+ set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdd->status);
+ }
+
ret = devm_watchdog_register_device(dev, wdd);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-22 8:24 Christophe Roullier [this message]
2019-11-22 10:28 ` [Linux-stm32] [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers: watchdog: stm32_iwdg: set WDOG_HW_RUNNING at probe Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-22 13:15 ` Christophe ROULLIER
2019-11-22 13:31 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-22 10:45 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191122082442.21695-1-christophe.roullier@st.com \
--to=christophe.roullier@st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).