linux-watchdog.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com>
To: <linux@roeck-us.net>, <shubhraj@xilinx.com>, <sgoud@xilinx.com>,
	<michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: <wim@linux-watchdog.org>, <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <git@xilinx.com>,
	Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@xilinx.com>,
	Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/5] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Add comment to spinlock
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:49:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210329161939.37680-2-srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210329161939.37680-1-srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com>

From: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@xilinx.com>

Based on checkpatch every spinlock should be documented.
The patch is fixing this issue:
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment
+	spinlock_t spinlock;

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
 drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
index 7fe4f7c3f7ce..00549164b3d7 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 struct xwdt_device {
 	void __iomem *base;
 	u32 wdt_interval;
-	spinlock_t spinlock;
+	spinlock_t spinlock; /* spinlock for register handling */
 	struct watchdog_device xilinx_wdt_wdd;
 	struct clk		*clk;
 };
-- 
2.9.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29 16:19 [PATCH V2 0/5] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Update on xilinx watchdog driver Srinivas Neeli
2021-03-29 16:19 ` Srinivas Neeli [this message]
2021-03-29 16:19 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Used BIT macro Srinivas Neeli
2021-03-29 21:54   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-29 16:19 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Used dev_dbg() Srinivas Neeli
2021-03-29 21:54   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-29 16:19 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Remove passing null pointer Srinivas Neeli
2021-03-29 16:19 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Skip printing pointer value Srinivas Neeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210329161939.37680-2-srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com \
    --to=srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com \
    --cc=git@xilinx.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=sgoud@xilinx.com \
    --cc=shubhraj@xilinx.com \
    --cc=srinivas.goud@xilinx.com \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).