From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: "Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Justin Chen" <justinpopo6@gmail.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:03:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya8xhUR5GbTxVE8w@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211206195115.GC3759192@roeck-us.net>
Florian Fainelli wrote:
> I don't see why you should be creating an immutable branch for Lee and
> not simply merge Rafal's "[PATCH V4 RESEND 2/2] dt-bindings: mfd: add
> Broadcom's Timer-Watchdog block" patch with Lee's ack directly. This is
> a new file, so I don't see how it would create conflicts as long as we
> don't pile up changes on top.
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> would that be OK for you to simply ack 2/2? So Guenter can pick my
> patch without the whole immutable branch & PR thing?
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I don't entirely see the point of that complexity for dt changes,
> but whatever. Since my tree is not the official watchdog-next tree,
> that means I can not take the entire series (which goes way beyond
> the dt changes and also drops the bcm63xx driver). Unless I hear
> otherwise, I'll drop the series from my tree for the time being
> and wait for the dt changes to be sorted out.
If Rob wants `dt_binding_check` to run cleanly in -next, we have to
treat the DT documentation in the same manner we do for real code
when build dependencies exist between patches. Simply sucking them up
through a single repo is just dandy until subsequent changes are
required, which unfortunately is often the case.
Being the Maintainer of MFD, which is often the centre point of
cross-subsystems patch sets, I've been bitten by this too many times.
Hence my hesitancy to 'just Ack it and be done'.
I've been pushing back on the requirement for clean `dt_binding_check`
runs in -next for a while and would much prefer to treat it the same
way we do `checkpatch.pl`, whereby a clean run is not a hard
requirement. Instead it is used as one of many tools to check for
inconsistencies prior to submission (as possibly against patch-sets
once they are posted onto the list). However, just as we see false
positives in `checkpatch.pl` we should see them in `dt_binding_check`
where patches have simply been applied into different trees and may
lag each other by a week or two.
> It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that
Not exactly, I said:
"> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well.
If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch."
The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable
branch to you, which I am in a position to do.
Of course all of this hassle just goes away if the clean
`dt_binding_check` run on -next requirement is laxed and we can just
take our own patches without fear of wrath.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-15 5:53 [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema Rafał Miłecki
2021-11-15 5:53 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 2/2] dt-bindings: mfd: add Broadcom's Timer-Watchdog block Rafał Miłecki
2021-11-18 22:45 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-29 9:44 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 7:50 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-06 8:44 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 8:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-06 9:05 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 17:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 18:55 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 19:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-06 19:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 19:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-06 19:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 19:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-07 10:03 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2021-12-07 15:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-07 15:44 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-28 9:21 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2021-12-29 9:45 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 21:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ya8xhUR5GbTxVE8w@google.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=justinpopo6@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).