linux-watchdog.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] watchdog: renesas_wdt: don't keep timer value during suspend/resume
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:12:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df16092e-f0f6-c085-3daf-303e1cb06428@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181209163632.GB1673@kunai>

On 12/9/18 8:36 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
>>> I can relate to the policy argument, though. Regardless of this patch, I
>>> wonder if we can make it configurable from userspace. A draft:
>>>
>>> #define	WDIOF_RESUME_OPTS	0x0800
>>>
>>> #define	WDIOS_RESUME_KEEP	0x0008
>>> #define	WDIOS_RESUME_RESET	0x0010
>>>
>>> and then in watchdog_ioctl() under WDIOC_SETOPTIONS:
>>>
>>> 	if (!(wdd->info->options & WDIOF_RESUME_OPTS))
>>> 		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> 		goto break;
>>>
>>> 	if (val & WDIOS_RESUME_KEEP)
>>> 		wdd->status |= WDOG_KEEP_TIMER_WHEN_RESUME;
>>>
>>> 	if (val & WDIOS_RESUME_RESET)
>>> 		wdd->status ~= ~WDOG_KEEP_TIMER_WHEN_RESUME;
>>>
>>> So, drivers with WDIOF_RESUME_OPTS could act on the
>>> WDOG_KEEP_TIMER_WHEN_RESUME flag.
>>>
>>> Opinions?
>>>
>>
>> Not entirely sure I understand the use case.
> 
> Well, as I mentioned before, I can understand the "isn't this policy?"
> question from Fabrizio. Would be good to hear his opinion on this.
> 
I understand, but what is the use case behind it ? If the watchdog
was close to expire on suspend, we want it to expire for good on resume ?
Make the watchdog during a suspend/resume cycle more stringent that during
normal operation, effectively letting it expire early (or earlier) ?

I'd rather clarify in the documentation that watchdog drivers are expected
to ping the watchdog after resume, ie that restarting the watchdog after
resume should be handled like starting the watchdog.

>> Having said that, if we were to add this option, I think only a single
>> flag would be needed - WDIOF_RESUME_KEEP. All we need to do is declare
>> that a ping on resume shall be the default. Anything else would result
>> in undefined per-driver default behavior.
> 
> I would very much love that. To be honest, I thought we already are in
> the undefined per-driver behaviour; this is why I added two flags, to
> not cause regressions. Declaring a default would be a great first step

How would adding two flag bits (or one, for that matter) change the
current (undefined) behavior ?
Also, what exactly would be the regression ? Existing drivers would
not change their behavior, neither with one or two or three flag bits.

Thanks,
Guenter

> IMHO, and then we can build the WDIOF_RESUME_KEEP option on top of it,
> if needed. But for clarity, the first step seems to be a good idea in
> any case, I'd say.
>  > Thanks,
> 
>     Wolfram
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-09 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04 12:01 [RFC] watchdog: renesas_wdt: don't keep timer value during suspend/resume Wolfram Sang
2018-12-04 12:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-12-04 12:48 ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-04 15:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-07 21:45   ` Wolfram Sang
2018-12-08 21:38     ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-09 16:36       ` Wolfram Sang
2018-12-09 18:12         ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-12-09 18:40           ` Wolfram Sang
2018-12-10  9:37           ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-10 14:23             ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-10 14:47               ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-10 14:47                 ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-10  9:40     ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-10 14:49 ` Fabrizio Castro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df16092e-f0f6-c085-3daf-303e1cb06428@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).