linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* License info
@ 2018-03-29 18:22 Larry Finger
  2018-04-03  9:32 ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2018-03-29 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kalle Valo, linux-wireless

Kalle,

What is your position regarding license information? Should the standard GPL-V2 
boiler plate be replaced with "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" in wireless files?

Thanks,

Larry

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: License info
  2018-03-29 18:22 License info Larry Finger
@ 2018-04-03  9:32 ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2018-04-03  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger; +Cc: linux-wireless

Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> writes:

> What is your position regarding license information? Should the
> standard GPL-V2 boiler plate be replaced with
> "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" in wireless files?

I don't think replacing licenses with SPDX identifiers is very
important, but I can apply patches if someone wants to convert drivers.
And at the moment I'm not planning to require SPDX identifiers in new
files.

-- 
Kalle Valo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: License info
  2018-04-03 19:53 Xose Vazquez Perez
@ 2018-04-03 20:08 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2018-04-03 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xose Vazquez Perez; +Cc: Larry Finger, linux-wireless

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 09:53:29PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Larry Finger wrote:
> 
> > What is your position regarding license information? Should the standard GPL-V2 
> > boiler plate be replaced with "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" in wireless files?
> 
> "GPL-2.0" tag is deprecated [0] .
> 
> 
> It should be used:
> for GNU General Public License v2.0 only:     "GPL-2.0-only"
> for GNU General Public License v2.0 or later: "GPL-2.0-or-later"

Please read Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.  We are sticking
with the "old" SPDX identifiers for now as they changed after we already
started marking up the kernel source tree.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: License info
@ 2018-04-03 19:53 Xose Vazquez Perez
  2018-04-03 20:08 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xose Vazquez Perez @ 2018-04-03 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger, linux-wireless, Greg KH

Larry Finger wrote:

> What is your position regarding license information? Should the standard GPL-V2 
> boiler plate be replaced with "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" in wireless files?

"GPL-2.0" tag is deprecated [0] .


It should be used:
for GNU General Public License v2.0 only:     "GPL-2.0-only"
for GNU General Public License v2.0 or later: "GPL-2.0-or-later"



[0] https://spdx.org/licenses/
    https://www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-03 20:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-29 18:22 License info Larry Finger
2018-04-03  9:32 ` Kalle Valo
2018-04-03 19:53 Xose Vazquez Perez
2018-04-03 20:08 ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).