linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] iwlwifi: fix access to prph when transport is stopped
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:28:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1512736104.4827.283.camel@coelho.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87efo5s93p.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 14:22 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 12:23 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > 
> > > But no wonder I called gnus-article-fill-cited-article, the
> > > commit
> > > log is just weirdly wrapped. Are you using outlook or how do you
> > > get
> > > it so ugly? :)
> > 
> > Heh! I don't think it's wrapped weirdly, it's just that the
> > paragraphs
> > don't have spaces between them, right? ;)
> 
> Sorry, don't get what you mean with missing spaces. To me (and
> patchwork[1] and git[2] seem to agree) the word wrapping is just
> broken
> for this commit log, and I have seen it also with other iwlwifi
> commits.
> For example, there are just two words in the second line "two paths."

That depends on how many characters per line you want to include.  "two
paths." is the last part of the first paragraph, I guess Sari's editor
is wrapping somewhere at <70 chars per line.

Then that is accentuated a bit by the lack of an empty line between
paragraphs.  But with those lines added, besides being a bit narrow, it
would look quite clear:

-----8<-----
When getting HW rfkill we get stop_device being called from
two paths.

One path is the IRQ calling stop device, and updating op
mode and stack.

As a result, cfg80211 is running rfkill sync work that shuts
down all devices (second path).

In the second path, we eventually get to iwl_mvm_stop_device
which calls iwl_fw_dump_conf_clear->iwl_fw_dbg_stop_recording,
that access periphery registers.

The device may be stopped at this point from the first path,
which will result with a failure to access those registers.

Simply checking for the trans status is insufficient, since
the race will still exist, only minimized.

Instead, move the stop from iwl_fw_dump_conf_clear (which is
getting called only from stop path) to the transport stop
device function, where the access is always safe.

This has the added value, of actually stopping dbgc before
stopping device even when the stop is initiated from the
transport.
----->8-----

Does it make sense?

I've already told Sari about your preference and I'll make sure the
next patches will look cleaner.  I can fix this patch if you want, but
is it worth remaking my pull-request just for this?

--
Cheers,
Luca.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-08 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-25 15:35 [PATCH 0/6] iwlwifi: fixes intended for 4.15 2017-11-25 Luca Coelho
2017-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] iwlwifi: mvm: set correct chains in Rx status Luca Coelho
2017-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] iwlwifi: mvm: don't use transmit queue hang detection when it is not possible Luca Coelho
2017-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] iwlwifi: mvm: fix the TX queue hang timeout for MONITOR vif type Luca Coelho
2017-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] iwlwifi: mvm: fix packet injection Luca Coelho
2017-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] iwlwifi: pcie: fix erroneous "Read failed message" Luca Coelho
2017-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] iwlwifi: fix access to prph when transport is stopped Luca Coelho
2017-11-29 10:19   ` Kalle Valo
2017-11-29 10:21     ` Kalle Valo
2017-11-29 10:23   ` Kalle Valo
2017-11-29 10:29     ` Luca Coelho
2017-12-08 12:22       ` Kalle Valo
2017-12-08 12:26         ` Kalle Valo
2017-12-08 12:35           ` Luca Coelho
2017-12-08 12:56             ` Kalle Valo
2017-12-08 12:28         ` Luca Coelho [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1512736104.4827.283.camel@coelho.fi \
    --to=luca@coelho.fi \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sara.sharon@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).