* A mailing list for regulatory wireless-regdb changes @ 2010-05-27 8:15 Luis R. Rodriguez 2010-05-27 15:05 ` John W. Linville 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-27 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-wireless, Michael Green, David Quan, Emmanuel Grumbach, John W. Linville David, can I trouble you for a mailman wireless-regdb mailing list on infradead.org? This would be used by those who are not developers and do not need to be subscribed to linux-wireless. An example are regulatory guys at different companies and generally interested people/developers on the topic. This should hopefully accelerate the turn around time for reviewing of patches and also a good placeholder for us to go back and check the discussions that went on about this. Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: A mailing list for regulatory wireless-regdb changes 2010-05-27 8:15 A mailing list for regulatory wireless-regdb changes Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-27 15:05 ` John W. Linville 2010-05-27 15:34 ` David Woodhouse 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: John W. Linville @ 2010-05-27 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: David Woodhouse, linux-wireless, Michael Green, David Quan, Emmanuel Grumbach On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:15:50AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > David, can I trouble you for a mailman wireless-regdb mailing list on > infradead.org? This would be used by those who are not developers and > do not need to be subscribed to linux-wireless. An example are > regulatory guys at different companies and generally interested > people/developers on the topic. This should hopefully accelerate the > turn around time for reviewing of patches and also a good placeholder > for us to go back and check the discussions that went on about this. Is this really necessary? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: A mailing list for regulatory wireless-regdb changes 2010-05-27 15:05 ` John W. Linville @ 2010-05-27 15:34 ` David Woodhouse 2010-05-27 15:43 ` John W. Linville 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2010-05-27 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John W. Linville Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez, linux-wireless, Michael Green, David Quan, Emmanuel Grumbach On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:05 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:15:50AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > David, can I trouble you for a mailman wireless-regdb mailing list on > > infradead.org? This would be used by those who are not developers and > > do not need to be subscribed to linux-wireless. An example are > > regulatory guys at different companies and generally interested > > people/developers on the topic. This should hopefully accelerate the > > turn around time for reviewing of patches and also a good placeholder > > for us to go back and check the discussions that went on about this. > > Is this really necessary? Feel free not to use it :) -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: A mailing list for regulatory wireless-regdb changes 2010-05-27 15:34 ` David Woodhouse @ 2010-05-27 15:43 ` John W. Linville 2010-05-27 16:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: John W. Linville @ 2010-05-27 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez, linux-wireless, Michael Green, David Quan, Emmanuel Grumbach On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:34:12PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:05 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:15:50AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > David, can I trouble you for a mailman wireless-regdb mailing list on > > > infradead.org? This would be used by those who are not developers and > > > do not need to be subscribed to linux-wireless. An example are > > > regulatory guys at different companies and generally interested > > > people/developers on the topic. This should hopefully accelerate the > > > turn around time for reviewing of patches and also a good placeholder > > > for us to go back and check the discussions that went on about this. > > > > Is this really necessary? > > Feel free not to use it :) Just hoping to avoid unnecessary confusion -- I suppose it is fine if that is what people want... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: A mailing list for regulatory wireless-regdb changes 2010-05-27 15:43 ` John W. Linville @ 2010-05-27 16:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2010-08-06 19:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-27 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John W. Linville Cc: David Woodhouse, linux-wireless, Michael Green, David Quan, Emmanuel Grumbach On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:43 AM, John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:34:12PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:05 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:15:50AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > > David, can I trouble you for a mailman wireless-regdb mailing list on >> > > infradead.org? This would be used by those who are not developers and >> > > do not need to be subscribed to linux-wireless. An example are >> > > regulatory guys at different companies and generally interested >> > > people/developers on the topic. This should hopefully accelerate the >> > > turn around time for reviewing of patches and also a good placeholder >> > > for us to go back and check the discussions that went on about this. >> > >> > Is this really necessary? >> >> Feel free not to use it :) > > Just hoping to avoid unnecessary confusion -- I suppose it is fine > if that is what people want... I do not know how else to help speed up review without having to wait for a intermediary delay of someone at a company forwarding some regulatory changes e-mail to a person who is supposed to review them. With the list we would have a direct way for people to communicate with the folks who do care about regulatory and who may have roles who do that. If people do not mind the constant "please give us a few days" e-mails then things work without the list but then we (at least Atheros) just need to make sure regulatory change e-mails do get to the proper folks for review because we (Atheros) is committed to reviewing these changes. Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: A mailing list for regulatory wireless-regdb changes 2010-05-27 16:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-08-06 19:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-08-06 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John W. Linville, Johannes Berg Cc: David Woodhouse, linux-wireless, Michael Green, David Quan, Emmanuel Grumbach On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:43 AM, John W. Linville > <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:34:12PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:05 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >>> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:15:50AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> > > David, can I trouble you for a mailman wireless-regdb mailing list on >>> > > infradead.org? This would be used by those who are not developers and >>> > > do not need to be subscribed to linux-wireless. An example are >>> > > regulatory guys at different companies and generally interested >>> > > people/developers on the topic. This should hopefully accelerate the >>> > > turn around time for reviewing of patches and also a good placeholder >>> > > for us to go back and check the discussions that went on about this. >>> > >>> > Is this really necessary? >>> >>> Feel free not to use it :) >> >> Just hoping to avoid unnecessary confusion -- I suppose it is fine >> if that is what people want... > > I do not know how else to help speed up review without having to wait > for a intermediary delay of someone at a company forwarding some > regulatory changes e-mail to a person who is supposed to review them. > With the list we would have a direct way for people to communicate > with the folks who do care about regulatory and who may have roles who > do that. > > If people do not mind the constant "please give us a few days" e-mails > then things work without the list but then we (at least Atheros) just > need to make sure regulatory change e-mails do get to the proper folks > for review because we (Atheros) is committed to reviewing these > changes. BTW I found a use for this list now, to archive some initial e-mails from Michael / others regarding reguatory changes. This information would need to be parsed and then submitted in patch form but it should also provide us with a URL reference on a regulatory related mailing list for some details for commits on wireless-regdb. I'll try it out next and you guys tell me if its OK. PS. I'll be subscribing a few of you guys to this list now :) Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-06 19:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-05-27 8:15 A mailing list for regulatory wireless-regdb changes Luis R. Rodriguez 2010-05-27 15:05 ` John W. Linville 2010-05-27 15:34 ` David Woodhouse 2010-05-27 15:43 ` John W. Linville 2010-05-27 16:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2010-08-06 19:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).