[PATCH V2 RESEND] rtw88: reduce polling time of IQ calibration

* [PATCH V2 RESEND] rtw88: reduce polling time of IQ calibration
@ 2020-12-08  1:45 Ping-Ke Shih
  2020-12-08  7:36 ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ping-Ke Shih @ 2020-12-08  1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvalo; +Cc: tony0620emma, linux-wireless, timlee

From: Chin-Yen Lee <timlee@realtek.com>

When 8822CE is associating with AP, driver will poll status bit of
IQ calibration to confirm the IQ calibration is done, and then move on
the association process. Current polling time for IQ calibration is 6
seconds.

But occasionally driver fails in polling the status bit because the status
bit is not set after IQ calibration is done. When it happends, association
process will be serieously delayed up to 6 seconds. To avoid it, we reduce
polling time to 300ms, in which the IQ calibration can be done.

Signed-off-by: Chin-Yen Lee <timlee@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
v2: move define to the beginning of file
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
index 7dd3ccb73793..dd560c28abb2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
 #include "bf.h"
 #include "efuse.h"
 
+#define IQK_DONE_8822C 0xaa
+
 static void rtw8822c_config_trx_mode(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 tx_path,
 				     u8 rx_path, bool is_tx2_path);
 
@@ -2110,20 +2112,17 @@ static void rtw8822c_do_iqk(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
 {
 	struct rtw_iqk_para para = {0};
 	u8 iqk_chk;
-	int counter;
+	int ret;
 
 	para.clear = 1;
 	rtw_fw_do_iqk(rtwdev, &para);
 
-	for (counter = 0; counter < 300; counter++) {
-		iqk_chk = rtw_read8(rtwdev, REG_RPT_CIP);
-		if (iqk_chk == 0xaa)
-			break;
-		msleep(20);
-	}
-	rtw_write8(rtwdev, REG_IQKSTAT, 0x0);
+	ret = read_poll_timeout(rtw_read8, iqk_chk, iqk_chk == IQK_DONE_8822C,
+				20000, 300000, false, rtwdev, REG_RPT_CIP);
+	if (ret)
+		rtw_warn(rtwdev, "failed to poll iqk status bit\n");
 
-	rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_RFK, "iqk counter=%d\n", counter);
+	rtw_write8(rtwdev, REG_IQKSTAT, 0x0);
 }
 
 /* for coex */
-- 
2.21.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread