linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>,
	Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-next-2024-03-08
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 08:58:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240308085839.47d8cb37@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmqc4qik.fsf@kernel.org>

On Fri, 08 Mar 2024 18:50:11 +0200 Kalle Valo wrote:
> > coccicheck flags:
> >
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922a.c:2235:2-4: WARNING: possible condition with no effect (if == else)  
> 
> Thanks, but how did you find this? I'm asking just to understand your process, at
> least the pull request shows all green:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240308100429.B8EA2C433F1@smtp.kernel.org/
> 
> We don't run coccicheck so it's not surprising there are new warnings.

We have another bunch of tests now which run on all outstanding patches
every 3 hours. selftests for example. We need to aggregate because
there's too much code getting posted. One of the "tests" we run is
make coccicheck.

https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/blob/master/contest/tests/cocci-check.sh

it's supposed to report back to patchwork as "contest", but
the reporting is not 100% accurate I need to fix it :| 
I look here instead: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/status.html

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-08 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-08 10:04 pull-request: wireless-next-2024-03-08 Kalle Valo
2024-03-08 15:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-08 16:50   ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-08 16:58     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-03-09  0:19     ` Ping-Ke Shih
2024-03-08 17:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240308085839.47d8cb37@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=ku920601@realtek.com \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).