From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: "Rajkumar Manoharan" <rmanoharan@Atheros.com>,
"Rajkumar Manoharan" <Rajkumar.Manoharan@Atheros.com>,
"Björn Smedman" <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ath9k: Handle interface changes properly
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:34:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D30A53B.5050603@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D30A3FC.7040609@candelatech.com>
On 2011-01-14 8:29 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 01/14/2011 11:24 AM, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:36:42AM +0530, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2011-01-14 7:53 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:52:02PM +0530, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>>>> On 2011-01-14 7:13 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>>>>> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:19:38PM +0530, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>>>> >> On 2011-01-13 5:35 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>>>>> >> > Instead of setting opmde as AP for WDS, it is better to handle WDS
>>>>> >> > case in ath9k_hw.
>>>>> >> Why? Right now I don't even see any NL80211_IFTYPE_WDS handling in
>>>>> >> ath9k_hw, and I can't think of anything that should be handled
>>>>> >> differently in ath9k_hw compared to the AP opmode.
>>>>> > For WDS station, what should be the interface type? Forgive if I'm wrong.
>>>>> There is no WDS station opmode. 'WDS station' is a regular station
>>>>> interface with 4-addr mode enabled. It needs no special handling in ath9k.
>>>> still not convinced. Then what is the point mac80211 is informing about
>>>> WDS type to drivers. mac itself can pass it as AP type like what it
>>>> is doing for p2p GO.
>>> The WDS type is something else. If you have two APs, you can link them
>>> together with a separate WDS vif on each side pointing at the remote MAC
>>> address of the other node.
>>> I think that when we use ah->opmode, we should only use it for very
>>> generic operating modes:
>>>
>>> AP: no TSF sync, beacon tx can be enabled.
>>> ADHOC: TSF sync against IBSS cell, beacon tx can be enabled
>>> STATION: TSF sync against one AP, only station beacon timers for PS.
>>>
>>> Only the above distinctions are relevant for ath9k_hw, everything else
>>> is handled by the driver/stack. There is no reason for adding extra
>>> checks to ath9k_hw for mesh and WDS, since they work best with
>>> ah->opmode set to AP, and there is nothing extra on the *hardware* side
>>> that should be configured there via a different opmode. That's why I
>>> think leaking the mac80211 interface types to ath9k_hw is a bad idea.
>> Thanks for your detailed explanation. And meanwhile Ben is also
>> fixing hw mode based on vif counter. It would be better if he make
>> use this thread and address the same.
>>
>> Ben,
>> Any comments.
>
> If all I need to do is to treat WDS and MESH like an AP, that shouldn't
> be too hard.
>
> Does WDS need a beacon?
No
> Is there any limitations to the number of WDS vifs allowed, including
> combinations with other VIF types?
I don't think so.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-14 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-12 14:30 [RFC] ath9k: Handle interface changes properly Rajkumar Manoharan
2011-01-12 17:06 ` Björn Smedman
2011-01-12 17:22 ` Sujith
2011-01-12 19:00 ` Björn Smedman
2011-01-13 1:56 ` Sujith
2011-01-13 5:16 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2011-01-13 5:10 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2011-01-12 19:51 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-01-12 20:14 ` Ben Greear
2011-01-13 5:18 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2011-01-13 14:23 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-01-13 16:35 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2011-01-13 16:49 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-01-14 18:13 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2011-01-14 18:22 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-01-14 18:53 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2011-01-14 19:06 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-01-14 19:24 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2011-01-14 19:29 ` Ben Greear
2011-01-14 19:34 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2011-01-14 23:02 ` Björn Smedman
2011-01-13 5:08 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D30A53B.5050603@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=Rajkumar.Manoharan@Atheros.com \
--cc=bjorn.smedman@venatech.se \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmanoharan@Atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).