linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: franky.lin@broadcom.com, hante.meuleman@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: PATCH v3 brcmfmac driver cleanup
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:23:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61239b54-0564-6e54-5af6-f2544be06c47@mnementh.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df934726-851d-68a5-eb29-a6c6b1780be2@broadcom.com>

On 24/07/17 20:47, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 19-07-17 21:07, Ian Molton wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find the 3rd revision of my cleanup patchset for brcmfmac.
>>
>> I've done some further cleanup and it now handles SDIO the ay the MMC subsystem
>> was designed to.
>>
>> I've also taken the liberty of greatly reducing the amount of indirection
>> used thoughout the SDIO code, which I think has improved readability quite a
>> lot.
>>
>> Hope this finds you all well.
> After only one week of vacation there was quite some catching up to do.
> So I decided to get an easy start and run 'checkpatch.pl --strict' over
> the series. Attached the output of that. Might be stuff that was already
> wrong before.

Some of it will be. I can see a couple of lines have crept over 80 chars.

Some lines are ~81-83 chars - I tend to leave those as its usually quite
apparent what is missing off the end. Longer ones I agree should be split.

The original source has some inconsistent whitespace too, which
complicates matters.

> I did only a quick check on patch 1/34 and it is really
> introduced by that patch. So can you please check the output.

Will have a run through and resubmit.

> FWIW, I tend to ignore the warning about block comments, ie.:

Yeah, I tend to agree. /* Blah as the first line of a multiline comment
just looks unbalanced to me.

-Ian

      reply	other threads:[~2017-07-26 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-19 19:07 PATCH v3 brcmfmac driver cleanup Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 01/34] brcmfmac: Fix parameter order in brcmf_sdiod_f0_writeb() Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 02/34] brcmfmac: Register sizes on hardware are not dependent on compiler types Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 03/34] brcmfmac: Split brcmf_sdiod_regrw_helper() up Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 04/34] brcmfmac: Clean up brcmf_sdiod_set_sbaddr_window() Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 05/34] brcmfmac: Remove dead IO code Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 06/34] brcmfmac: Remove bandaid for SleepCSR Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 07/34] brcmfmac: Remove brcmf_sdiod_request_data() Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 08/34] brcmfmac: Fix uninitialised variable Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 09/34] brcmfmac: Remove noisy debugging Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 10/34] brcmfmac: Rename bcmerror to err Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 11/34] brcmfmac: Split brcmf_sdiod_buffrw function up Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 12/34] brcmfmac: Replace old IO functions with simpler ones Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 13/34] brcmfmac: Tidy register definitions a little Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 14/34] brcmfmac: Remove brcmf_sdiod_addrprep() Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 15/34] brcmfamc: remove unnecessary call to brcmf_sdiod_set_backplane_window() Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 16/34] brcmfmac: Cleanup offsetof() Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 17/34] brcmfmac: Remove unused macro Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 18/34] brcmfmac: Rename SOC_AI to SOC_AXI Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 19/34] brcmfmac: Get rid of chip_priv and core_priv structs Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 20/34] brcmfmac: Whitespace patch Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 21/34] brcmfmac: Simplify chip probe routine Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 22/34] brcmfmac: Rename axi functions for clarity Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 23/34] brcmfmac: HUGE cleanup of IO access functions Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 24/34] brcmfmac: Rename chip.ctx -> chip.bus_priv Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 25/34] brcmfmac: Remove repeated calls to brcmf_chip_get_core() Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 26/34] brcmfmac: General cleaning up. whitespace and comments fix Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 27/34] brcmfmac: Remove {r,w}_sdreg32 Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 28/34] brcmfmac: Rename buscore->core for consistency Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 29/34] brcmfmac: stabilise the value of ->sbwad in use for some xfer routines Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 30/34] brcmfmac: Correctly handle accesses to SDIO func0 Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 31/34] brcmfmac: Remove func0 from function array Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 32/34] brcmfmac: Replace function index with function pointer Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 33/34] brcmfmac: Remove array of functions Ian Molton
2017-07-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 34/34] brcmfmac: Reduce the noise from repeatedly dereferencing common pointers Ian Molton
2017-07-24 19:47 ` PATCH v3 brcmfmac driver cleanup Arend van Spriel
2017-07-26 10:23   ` Ian Molton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61239b54-0564-6e54-5af6-f2544be06c47@mnementh.co.uk \
    --to=ian@mnementh.co.uk \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).