[PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[chaitanya.mgit]

From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>

Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.
---
 db.txt | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
index fa5c0e0..ae650dd 100644
--- a/db.txt
+++ b/db.txt
@@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ country US: DFS-FCC
 	(5490 - 5730 @ 160), (23), DFS
 	(5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
 	# 60g band
-	# reference: http://cfr.regstoday.com/47cfr15.aspx#47_CFR_15p255
-	# channels 1,2,3, EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
-	(57240 - 63720 @ 2160), (40)
+	# reference: section IV-D https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
+	# channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
+	(57240 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)
 
 country UY: DFS-FCC
 	(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[Krishna Chaitanya]

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:38 PM <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>
>
> Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
> 57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.
> ---
>  db.txt | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> index fa5c0e0..ae650dd 100644
> --- a/db.txt
> +++ b/db.txt
> @@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ country US: DFS-FCC
>         (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (23), DFS
>         (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
>         # 60g band
> -       # reference: http://cfr.regstoday.com/47cfr15.aspx#47_CFR_15p255
> -       # channels 1,2,3, EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> -       (57240 - 63720 @ 2160), (40)
> +       # reference: section IV-D https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
> +       # channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> +       (57240 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)
>
>  country UY: DFS-FCC
>         (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
>
Kalle/Seth,

Any update on this? Patchwork shows its delegated to you(may be by default).

Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[Kalle Valo]

Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:38 PM <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>
>>
>> Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
>> 57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.
>> ---
>>  db.txt | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
>> index fa5c0e0..ae650dd 100644
>> --- a/db.txt
>> +++ b/db.txt
>> @@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ country US: DFS-FCC
>>         (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (23), DFS
>>         (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
>>         # 60g band
>> -       # reference: http://cfr.regstoday.com/47cfr15.aspx#47_CFR_15p255
>> -       # channels 1,2,3, EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
>> -       (57240 - 63720 @ 2160), (40)
>> +       # reference: section IV-D https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
>> +       # channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
>> +       (57240 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)
>>
>>  country UY: DFS-FCC
>>         (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
>>
> Kalle/Seth,
>
> Any update on this? Patchwork shows its delegated to you(may be by default).

Seth doesn't use patchwork so I just delegate regdb patches to myself
and then mark them as 'Not Applicaple'.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[Krishna Chaitanya]

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:20 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:38 PM <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
> >> 57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.
> >> ---
> >>  db.txt | 6 +++---
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> >> index fa5c0e0..ae650dd 100644
> >> --- a/db.txt
> >> +++ b/db.txt
> >> @@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ country US: DFS-FCC
> >>         (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (23), DFS
> >>         (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
> >>         # 60g band
> >> -       # reference: http://cfr.regstoday.com/47cfr15.aspx#47_CFR_15p255
> >> -       # channels 1,2,3, EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> >> -       (57240 - 63720 @ 2160), (40)
> >> +       # reference: section IV-D https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
> >> +       # channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> >> +       (57240 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)
> >>
> >>  country UY: DFS-FCC
> >>         (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
> >>
> > Kalle/Seth,
> >
> > Any update on this? Patchwork shows its delegated to you(may be by default).
>
> Seth doesn't use patchwork so I just delegate regdb patches to myself
> and then mark them as 'Not Applicaple'.
>
Ah okay, Thanks. Will wait for Seth to comment on this.


-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Chaitanya T K.

Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[Seth Forshee]

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:17:31AM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:20 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:38 PM <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
> > >> 57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.
> > >> ---
> > >>  db.txt | 6 +++---
> > >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> > >> index fa5c0e0..ae650dd 100644
> > >> --- a/db.txt
> > >> +++ b/db.txt
> > >> @@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ country US: DFS-FCC
> > >>         (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (23), DFS
> > >>         (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
> > >>         # 60g band
> > >> -       # reference: http://cfr.regstoday.com/47cfr15.aspx#47_CFR_15p255
> > >> -       # channels 1,2,3, EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> > >> -       (57240 - 63720 @ 2160), (40)
> > >> +       # reference: section IV-D https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
> > >> +       # channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> > >> +       (57240 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)
> > >>
> > >>  country UY: DFS-FCC
> > >>         (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
> > >>
> > > Kalle/Seth,
> > >
> > > Any update on this? Patchwork shows its delegated to you(may be by default).
> >
> > Seth doesn't use patchwork so I just delegate regdb patches to myself
> > and then mark them as 'Not Applicaple'.
> >
> Ah okay, Thanks. Will wait for Seth to comment on this.

Sorry, I had an extended time off around the holidays and just haven't
gotten to applying patches from this list yet. I'm getting started on it
now so patches should be applied soon.

Seth

Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[Seth Forshee]

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:38:15PM +0530, chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>
> 
> Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
> 57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.

This looks right to me based on my research. You're missing one thing
though. You need to provide a Signed-off-by tag, please see the
CONTRIBUTING file for more information. If you reply with your tag I
will add it when I apply the patch. Thanks!

> ---
>  db.txt | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> index fa5c0e0..ae650dd 100644
> --- a/db.txt
> +++ b/db.txt
> @@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ country US: DFS-FCC
>  	(5490 - 5730 @ 160), (23), DFS
>  	(5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
>  	# 60g band
> -	# reference: http://cfr.regstoday.com/47cfr15.aspx#47_CFR_15p255
> -	# channels 1,2,3, EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> -	(57240 - 63720 @ 2160), (40)
> +	# reference: section IV-D https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
> +	# channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> +	(57240 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)
>  
>  country UY: DFS-FCC
>  	(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[Krishna Chaitanya]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:43 AM Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:38:15PM +0530, chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>
> >
> > Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
> > 57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.
>
> This looks right to me based on my research. You're missing one thing
> though. You need to provide a Signed-off-by tag, please see the
> CONTRIBUTING file for more information. If you reply with your tag I
> will add it when I apply the patch. Thanks!

Sorry, didn't realize missed SO. You can use below. Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Tata@bluwireless.co.uk>

> > ---
> >  db.txt | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> > index fa5c0e0..ae650dd 100644
> > --- a/db.txt
> > +++ b/db.txt
> > @@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ country US: DFS-FCC
> >       (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (23), DFS
> >       (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
> >       # 60g band
> > -     # reference: http://cfr.regstoday.com/47cfr15.aspx#47_CFR_15p255
> > -     # channels 1,2,3, EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> > -     (57240 - 63720 @ 2160), (40)
> > +     # reference: section IV-D https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
> > +     # channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> > +     (57240 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)
> >
> >  country UY: DFS-FCC
> >       (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >



-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Chaitanya T K.

Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us

[Seth Forshee]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 04:19:26PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:43 AM Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:38:15PM +0530, chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
> > > 57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.
> >
> > This looks right to me based on my research. You're missing one thing
> > though. You need to provide a Signed-off-by tag, please see the
> > CONTRIBUTING file for more information. If you reply with your tag I
> > will add it when I apply the patch. Thanks!
> 
> Sorry, didn't realize missed SO. You can use below. Thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Tata@bluwireless.co.uk>

Sorry for the delay. Applied now, thanks!