Re: [PATCH wireless-drivers] mt76: fix possible pktid leak

[Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1672 bytes --]

> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> >> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> >> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > Fix a possible idr pkt-id leak if the packet is dropped on tx side
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Fixes: bd1e3e7b693c ("mt76: introduce packet_id idr")
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> >> >> > Acked-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
> >> >> 
> >> >> Patch applied to wireless-drivers.git, thanks.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 2a9e9857473b mt76: fix possible pktid leak
> >> >
> >> > Hi Kalle,
> >> >
> >> > Unfortunately I found a regression introduced by this patch for mt7663u (and I
> >> > guess for mt7921s as well). Do you want me to post a fix or just a v2?
> >> 
> >> I don't rebase my trees, so please post a fix. I was planning to submit
> >> a pull request to net tree today, but is this so serious that I should
> >> skip that?
> >
> > I have already tested mt7663u but I do not have mt7921s hw for testing (but the
> > behaviour should be the same). I guess we can split the patch, just post the
> > fix for mt7663u and let Sean the time to test it on mt7921s (I am not sure
> > mt7921s is already available on the market). In this way you can send the PR
> > today. What do you think?
> 
> I think it's best to wait, I prefer to have proper build testing on my
> tree before I submit the pull request.

ack, fine to me. Let's wait for Sean in this case.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> -- 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
> 
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]