From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/13] libertas: make return of 0 explicit
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 08:30:46 +0800 (SGT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1405200829390.2723@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5379FCD0.2030506@cogentembedded.com>
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 19-05-2014 8:31, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>
> > Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
> > the fact that the result is always 0.
>
> > A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
> > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> > // <smpl>
> > @r exists@
> > local idexpression ret;
> > expression e;
> > position p;
> > @@
> >
> > -ret = 0;
> > ... when != ret = e
> > return
> > - ret
> > + 0
> > ;
> > // </smpl>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>
> > ---
> > Alternatively, was an error code intended in the bad length case, as is
> > done in process_brxed_802_11_packet?
>
> > drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c
> > index c7366b0..807c5b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c
> [...]
> > @@ -154,10 +152,9 @@ int lbs_process_rxed_packet(struct lbs_private *priv,
> > struct sk_buff *skb)
> > else
> > netif_rx_ni(skb);
> >
> > - ret = 0;
> > done:
> > - lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_RX, "ret %d", ret);
> > - return ret;
> > + lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_RX, "ret %d", 0);
>
> Why not just "ret 0"?
OK, I wasn't sure if it was useful to keep the same number of arguments.
But I will update it, since from the definition of lbs_deb_leave_args it
seems ok.
julia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-20 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-19 4:31 [PATCH 0/13] make return of 0 explicit Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 1/13] libertas: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 7:43 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 12:45 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-05-19 17:25 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-22 12:32 ` [PATCH] libertas: fix return value when processing invalid packet Dan Williams
2014-05-22 21:57 ` James Cameron
2014-05-20 0:30 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2014-05-20 0:36 ` [PATCH 1/13] libertas: make return of 0 explicit Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 12/13] brcmsmac: " Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1405200829390.2723@hadrien \
--to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).