From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: linuxwifi@intel.com, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Slow performance (~30mbps) with Intel 9260 (and 8265, 3168) using 5G
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 06:45:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c078f515-51bd-2195-6b96-901db8872028@gmx.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2814 bytes --]
Hi,
Recent upgraded my wifi adapter from 8265 to 9260 of my ThinkPad X1C 6th
gen.
However the initial test is producing some unacceptable results:
Furthermore, my desktop (intel 3168), and the original 8265 of my laptop
also reproduce the same result.
Kernels are the same 5.2.11-arch1-1-ARCH across my laptop and desktop.
Tried lts (4.19) on my laptop, the same result.
Even under Windows, it's all the same.
[ 5] local 240e:3a1:c40:6c0::278 port 43334 connected to
240e:3a1:c40:6c0::16b port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.95 MBytes 41.5 Mbits/sec 0 219 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.44 MBytes 20.5 Mbits/sec 0 248 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.58 MBytes 13.3 Mbits/sec 1 1.39 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.10 MBytes 9.21 Mbits/sec 44 194 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.39 MBytes 36.8 Mbits/sec 0 226 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 4.39 MBytes 36.8 Mbits/sec 0 247 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 4.39 MBytes 36.8 Mbits/sec 0 257 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 4.57 MBytes 38.3 Mbits/sec 0 259 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 3.84 MBytes 32.2 Mbits/sec 0 259 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.39 MBytes 36.8 Mbits/sec 0 261 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 36.0 MBytes 30.2 Mbits/sec 45 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 34.9 MBytes 29.2 Mbits/sec
receiver
Yep, less than 40mbps using 5G.
While I can even feel obvious lag when using ssh, some quick keystroke
will easily cause a lag.
I though it's the Linux support causing problem (even I'm using Arch
with 5.2 kernel) for the newer 9260 card, then I switched back to 8265.
But the same problem still exists!!
What makes things even stranger, under Windows, it's all the same result.
To exclude the problem of the AP, my android phone can easily get over
200mbps through the same AP.
Furthermore, I tested my desktop which has an Intel 3168 card, and to my
surprise, it's the same result less than 40mbps.
Although it doesn't really hurt as both my desktop and laptop is mostly
connected through ethernet, it still doesn't make sense to me.
Here is the dmesg of my laptop. (Please ignore the perf buffer warning,
as I also tried to trace iwlwifi:* and iwlwifi_msg:* events)
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/d5TO6kvbBOwQ~tkLgDbXsQ/raw
The iw list output:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/QKIOLyItCLcwTJoan8Wd3g/raw
Any ideas how this could happen to 3 different intel cards on two
different systems? (Although all running the same Arch kernel and latest
firmware)
Thanks,
Qu
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-09-07 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-07 22:45 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-09-09 6:00 ` [linuxwifi] Slow performance (~30mbps) with Intel 9260 (and 8265, 3168) using 5G Luciano Coelho
2019-09-09 6:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-09-09 6:18 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c078f515-51bd-2195-6b96-901db8872028@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).