linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Fenghua Yu' <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"Xiaoyao Li " <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 04/21] x86/split_lock: Align x86_capability to unsigned long to avoid split locked access
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:20:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8ca959a4bc549b59baca563660d42d6@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555536851-17462-5-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

From: Fenghua Yu
> Sent: 17 April 2019 22:34
> 
> set_cpu_cap() calls locked BTS and clear_cpu_cap() calls locked BTR to
> operate on bitmap defined in x86_capability.
> 
> Locked BTS/BTR accesses a single unsigned long location. In 64-bit mode,
> the location is at:
> base address of x86_capability + (bit offset in x86_capability / 64) * 8
> 
> Since base address of x86_capability may not be aligned to unsigned long,
> the single unsigned long location may cross two cache lines and
> accessing the location by locked BTS/BTR introductions will cause
> split lock.

Isn't the problem that the type (and definition) of x86_capability[] are wrong.
If the 'bitmap' functions are used for it, it should be defined as a bitmap.
This would make it 'unsigned long' not __u32.

This type munging of bitmaps only works on LE systems.

OTOH the locked BTS/BTR instructions could be changed to use 32 bit accesses.
ISTR some of the associated functions use byte accesses.

Perhaps there ought to be asm wrappers for BTS/BTR that do 8bit and
32bit accesses.

> 
> To fix the split lock issue, align x86_capability to size of unsigned long
> so that the location will be always within one cache line.
> 
> Changing x86_capability's type to unsigned long may also fix the issue
> because x86_capability will be naturally aligned to size of unsigned long.
> But this needs additional code changes. So choose the simpler solution
> by setting the array's alignment to size of unsigned long.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index 2bb3a648fc12..7c62b9ad6e5a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,9 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
>  	__u32			extended_cpuid_level;
>  	/* Maximum supported CPUID level, -1=no CPUID: */
>  	int			cpuid_level;
> -	__u32			x86_capability[NCAPINTS + NBUGINTS];
> +	/* Aligned to size of unsigned long to avoid split lock in atomic ops */
> +	__u32			x86_capability[NCAPINTS + NBUGINTS]
> +				__aligned(sizeof(unsigned long));
>  	char			x86_vendor_id[16];
>  	char			x86_model_id[64];
>  	/* in KB - valid for CPUS which support this call: */
> --
> 2.19.1

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17 21:33 [PATCH v7 00/21] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 01/21] x86/common: Align cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set to unsigned long Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 02/21] drivers/net/b44: Align pwol_mask to unsigned long for better performance Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 03/21] wlcore: simplify/fix/optimize reg_ch_conf_pending operations Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 04/21] x86/split_lock: Align x86_capability to unsigned long to avoid split locked access Fenghua Yu
2019-04-18  9:20   ` David Laight [this message]
2019-04-18 11:08     ` David Laight
2019-04-18 11:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-18 13:14         ` David Laight
2019-04-18 13:26           ` David Laight
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 05/21] x86/msr-index: Define MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY and split lock detection bit Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 06/21] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 07/21] x86/split_lock: Enumerate split lock detection by MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 08/21] x86/split_lock: Enumerate split lock detection on Icelake mobile processor Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:33 ` [PATCH v7 09/21] x86/split_lock: Define MSR TEST_CTL register Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 10/21] x86/split_lock: Define per CPU variable to cache MSR TEST_CTL Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 22:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-18  1:28     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-18  6:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 11/21] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 12/21] kvm/x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 13/21] kvm/vmx: Emulate MSR TEST_CTL Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 14/21] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by default Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 22:41   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 15/21] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to enable/disable split lock detection during run time Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 22:47   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-18  0:57     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-18  6:41       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-23 20:48         ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 13:45           ` David Laight
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 16/21] x86/split_lock: Document the new sysfs file for split lock detection Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 17/21] x86/clearcpuid: Support multiple clearcpuid options Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 23:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 18/21] x86/clearcpuid: Support feature flag string in kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 23:19   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-17 23:47     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-18  6:16       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 19/21] x86/clearcpuid: Apply cleared feature bits that are forced set before Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 20/21] x86/clearcpuid: Clear CPUID bit in CPUID faulting Fenghua Yu
2019-04-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v7 21/21] x86/clearcpuid: Change document for kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c8ca959a4bc549b59baca563660d42d6@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).