linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_read return an error code
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:08:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200124010802.GZ8247@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200124001658.GX8247@magnolia>

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:16:58PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 02:20:15PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:42:03PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > -				return -ENOMEM;
> > > +			error = xfs_buf_read(mp->m_ddev_targp, dblkno, dblkcnt,
> > > +					0, &bp, &xfs_attr3_rmt_buf_ops);
> > > +			if (error)
> > > +				return error;
> > >  			error = bp->b_error;
> > >  			if (error) {
> > >  				xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
> > 
> > This still has the bogus b_error check where it should just check the
> > error and report it based on the return value.
> 
> Yes, because at this point midway through the series xfs_buf_read only
> knows how to return -ENOMEM.  I'm changing the *interfaces* here, saving
> most of the behavior changes for the xfs_buf_read_map change...
> 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> > > index 56e081dd1d96..fb60c36a8a5b 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> > > @@ -213,16 +213,25 @@ xfs_buf_get(
> > >  	return xfs_buf_get_map(target, &map, 1, 0);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static inline struct xfs_buf *
> > > +static inline int
> > >  xfs_buf_read(
> > >  	struct xfs_buftarg	*target,
> > >  	xfs_daddr_t		blkno,
> > >  	size_t			numblks,
> > >  	xfs_buf_flags_t		flags,
> > > +	struct xfs_buf		**bpp,
> > >  	const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops)
> > >  {
> > > +	struct xfs_buf		*bp;
> > >  	DEFINE_SINGLE_BUF_MAP(map, blkno, numblks);
> > > -	return xfs_buf_read_map(target, &map, 1, flags, ops);
> > > +
> > > +	*bpp = NULL;
> > > +	bp = xfs_buf_read_map(target, &map, 1, flags, ops);
> > > +	if (!bp)
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +	*bpp = bp;
> 
> ...because otherwise I end having to migrate all the bp->b_error
> checking into this static inline function, which causes compile errors.
> 
> I could work around /that/ by moving the xfs_buf_read_map conversion
> earlier in the series, but I'd have to rebase the whole series to
> achieve the same end result, which seems pointless.
> 
> But I guess I could go mess around with it and see just how much of a
> pain doing that /actually/ is...

Changing the order to the following:

xfs: make xfs_buf_alloc return an error code
xfs: make xfs_buf_get_map return an error code
xfs: make xfs_buf_read_map return an error code
xfs: make xfs_buf_get return an error code
xfs: make xfs_buf_get_uncached return an error code
xfs: make xfs_buf_read return an error code
xfs: make xfs_trans_get_buf_map return an error code
xfs: make xfs_trans_get_buf return an error code
xfs: remove the xfs_btree_get_buf[ls] functions
xfs: make xfs_*read_agf return EAGAIN to ALLOC_FLAG_TRYLOCK callers
xfs: remove unnecessary null pointer checks from _read_agf callers
xfs: fix xfs_buf_ioerror_alert location reporting

Was a lot less code churn than I thought it would be.

--D

> --D
> 
> > > +	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static inline void
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > > index 0d683fb96396..b29806846916 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > > @@ -2745,10 +2745,10 @@ xlog_recover_buffer_pass2(
> > >  	if (buf_f->blf_flags & XFS_BLF_INODE_BUF)
> > >  		buf_flags |= XBF_UNMAPPED;
> > >  
> > > -	bp = xfs_buf_read(mp->m_ddev_targp, buf_f->blf_blkno, buf_f->blf_len,
> > > -			  buf_flags, NULL);
> > > -	if (!bp)
> > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +	error = xfs_buf_read(mp->m_ddev_targp, buf_f->blf_blkno, buf_f->blf_len,
> > > +			  buf_flags, &bp, NULL);
> > > +	if (error)
> > > +		return error;
> > >  	error = bp->b_error;
> > >  	if (error) {
> > 
> > .. and same here.
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-24  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-23  7:41 [PATCH v4 00/12] xfs: make buffer functions return error codes Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23  7:41 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_alloc return an error code Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  0:47   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_read " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23 22:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-24  0:16     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:08       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-01-24  0:49   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_get " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  0:50   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_get_uncached " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  0:53   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_read_map " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23 22:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-24  0:23     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  4:59       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:31   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-24  4:34     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_get_map " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:41   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: make xfs_trans_get_buf_map " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:44   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: make xfs_trans_get_buf " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:48   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: remove the xfs_btree_get_buf[ls] functions Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:50   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: make xfs_*read_agf return EAGAIN to ALLOC_FLAG_TRYLOCK callers Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  2:00   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-24  4:47     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23  7:43 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: remove unnecessary null pointer checks from _read_agf callers Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  2:01   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:43 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: fix xfs_buf_ioerror_alert location reporting Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  2:07   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-24  4:21     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200124010802.GZ8247@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).