linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: fix xfs_buf_ioerror_alert location reporting
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:07:27 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200124020727.GM7090@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157976538741.2388944.8089997383572416484.stgit@magnolia>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:43:07PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> Instead of passing __func__ to the error reporting function, let's use
> the return address builtins so that the messages actually tell you which
> higher level function called the buffer functions.  This was previously
> true for the xfs_buf_read callers, but not for the xfs_trans_read_buf
> callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c         |   12 +++++++-----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h         |    7 ++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c    |    2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c |    4 ++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c   |    5 +++--
>  5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Makes sense, but I have a concern that this series now has added two
new parameters to the buffer read functions. Perhaps we should consider
wrapping this all up in an args structure? That's a separate piece
of work, not for this patchset.

So far this patch,

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-24  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-23  7:41 [PATCH v4 00/12] xfs: make buffer functions return error codes Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23  7:41 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_alloc return an error code Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  0:47   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_read " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23 22:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-24  0:16     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:08       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  0:49   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_get " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  0:50   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_get_uncached " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  0:53   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_read_map " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23 22:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-24  0:23     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  4:59       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:31   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-24  4:34     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: make xfs_buf_get_map " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:41   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: make xfs_trans_get_buf_map " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:44   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: make xfs_trans_get_buf " Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:48   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: remove the xfs_btree_get_buf[ls] functions Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  1:50   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:42 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: make xfs_*read_agf return EAGAIN to ALLOC_FLAG_TRYLOCK callers Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  2:00   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-24  4:47     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-23  7:43 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: remove unnecessary null pointer checks from _read_agf callers Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  2:01   ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:43 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: fix xfs_buf_ioerror_alert location reporting Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  2:07   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2020-01-24  4:21     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  5:18 [PATCH v5 00/12] xfs: make buffer functions return error codes Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24  5:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: fix xfs_buf_ioerror_alert location reporting Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24 23:12   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200124020727.GM7090@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).