linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] xfs: refactor default quota grace period setting code
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:03:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213020342.GC6870@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200213015302.GZ6870@magnolia>

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 05:53:02PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 06:15:18PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 12/31/19 7:11 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > 
> > > Refactor the code that sets the default quota grace period into a helper
> > > function so that we can override the ondisk behavior later.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h |    8 ++++++++
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h        |    2 ++
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c   |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c   |   16 ++++++++++++----
> > >  4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > > index 95761b38fe86..557db5e51eec 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > > @@ -1188,6 +1188,10 @@ static inline void xfs_dinode_put_rdev(struct xfs_dinode *dip, xfs_dev_t rdev)
> > >   * time zero is the Unix epoch, Jan  1 00:00:01 UTC 1970.  An expiration value
> > >   * of zero means that the quota limit has not been reached, and therefore no
> > >   * expiration has been set.
> > > + *
> > > + * The length of quota grace periods are unsigned 32-bit quantities in units of
> > > + * seconds (which are stored in the root dquot).  A value of zero means to use
> > > + * the default period.
> > 
> > Doesn't a value of zero mean that the soft limit has not been exceeded, and no
> > timer is in force?  And when soft limit is exceeded, the timer starts ticking
> > based on the value in the root dquot?
> 
> Yes and yes.
> 
> > i.e. you can't set a custom per-user grace period, can you?
> 
> And yes.
> 
> > Perhaps:
> > 
> > * The length of quota grace periods are unsigned 32-bit quantities in units of
> > * seconds.  The grace period for each quota type is stored in the root dquot
> > * and is applied/transferred to a user quota when it exceeds a soft limit.
> 
> Much better.  I'll crib your version. :)
> 
> > >   */
> > >  
> > >  /*
> > > @@ -1202,6 +1206,10 @@ static inline void xfs_dinode_put_rdev(struct xfs_dinode *dip, xfs_dev_t rdev)
> > >   */
> > >  #define XFS_DQ_TIMEOUT_MAX	((int64_t)U32_MAX)
> > >  
> > > +/* Quota grace periods, ranging from zero (use the defaults) to ~136 years. */
> > 
> > same thing.  The default can be set between 0 and ~136 years, that gets transferred
> > to any user who exceeds soft quota, and it counts down from there.
> 
> Yeah, I'll crib this too.
> 
> --D
> 
> > > +#define XFS_DQ_GRACE_MIN	((int64_t)0)
> > > +#define XFS_DQ_GRACE_MAX	((int64_t)U32_MAX)
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > >   * This is the main portion of the on-disk representation of quota
> > >   * information for a user. This is the q_core of the struct xfs_dquot that
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
> > > index 52dc5326b7bf..b8811f927a3c 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
> > > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ xfs_check_ondisk_structs(void)
> > >  	XFS_CHECK_VALUE(XFS_INO_TIME_MAX,			2147483647LL);
> > >  	XFS_CHECK_VALUE(XFS_DQ_TIMEOUT_MIN,			1LL);
> > >  	XFS_CHECK_VALUE(XFS_DQ_TIMEOUT_MAX,			4294967295LL);
> > > +	XFS_CHECK_VALUE(XFS_DQ_GRACE_MIN,			0LL);
> > > +	XFS_CHECK_VALUE(XFS_DQ_GRACE_MAX,			4294967295LL);
> > 
> > *cough* notondisk *cough*
> > 
> > >  
> > >  	/* ag/file structures */
> > >  	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_acl,			4);
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> > > index 74220948a360..20a6d304d1be 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> > > @@ -438,6 +438,20 @@ xfs_qm_scall_quotaon(
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +/* Set a new quota grace period. */
> > > +static inline void
> > > +xfs_qm_set_grace(
> > > +	time_t			*qi_limit,
> >                                  ^ doesn't get used?
> > > +	__be32			*dtimer,
> > > +	const s64		grace)
> > > +{
> > > +	time64_t		new_grace;
> > > +
> > > +	new_grace = clamp_t(time64_t, grace, XFS_DQ_GRACE_MIN,
> > > +					     XFS_DQ_GRACE_MAX);
> > > +	*dtimer = cpu_to_be32(new_grace);
> > 
> > You've lost setting the qi_limit here (q->qi_btimelimit etc)
> > 
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  #define XFS_QC_MASK \
> > >  	(QC_LIMIT_MASK | QC_TIMER_MASK | QC_WARNS_MASK)
> > >  
> > > @@ -567,18 +581,15 @@ xfs_qm_scall_setqlim(
> > >  		 * soft and hard limit values (already done, above), and
> > >  		 * for warnings.
> > >  		 */
> > > -		if (newlim->d_fieldmask & QC_SPC_TIMER) {
> > > -			q->qi_btimelimit = newlim->d_spc_timer;
> > 
> > i.e. qi_btimelimit never gets set now, which is what actually controls
> > the timers when a uid/gid/pid goes over softlimit.

Oops, good catch.  Thank you for starting a review of this!

--D

> > > -			ddq->d_btimer = cpu_to_be32(newlim->d_spc_timer);
> > > -		}
> > > -		if (newlim->d_fieldmask & QC_INO_TIMER) {
> > > -			q->qi_itimelimit = newlim->d_ino_timer;
> > > -			ddq->d_itimer = cpu_to_be32(newlim->d_ino_timer);
> > > -		}
> > > -		if (newlim->d_fieldmask & QC_RT_SPC_TIMER) {
> > > -			q->qi_rtbtimelimit = newlim->d_rt_spc_timer;
> > > -			ddq->d_rtbtimer = cpu_to_be32(newlim->d_rt_spc_timer);
> > > -		}
> > > +		if (newlim->d_fieldmask & QC_SPC_TIMER)
> > > +			xfs_qm_set_grace(&q->qi_btimelimit, &ddq->d_btimer,
> > > +					newlim->d_spc_timer);
> > > +		if (newlim->d_fieldmask & QC_INO_TIMER)
> > > +			xfs_qm_set_grace(&q->qi_itimelimit, &ddq->d_itimer,
> > > +					newlim->d_ino_timer);
> > > +		if (newlim->d_fieldmask & QC_RT_SPC_TIMER)
> > > +			xfs_qm_set_grace(&q->qi_rtbtimelimit, &ddq->d_rtbtimer,
> > > +					newlim->d_rt_spc_timer);
> > >  		if (newlim->d_fieldmask & QC_SPC_WARNS)
> > >  			q->qi_bwarnlimit = newlim->d_spc_warns;
> > >  		if (newlim->d_fieldmask & QC_INO_WARNS)
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > > index 248cfc369efc..7a2a3bd11db9 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > > @@ -563,6 +563,14 @@ xfs_quota_warn(
> > >  			   mp->m_super->s_dev, type);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +/* Has a quota grace period expired? */
> > 
> > seems like this is not part of "quota grace period setting code"
> > - needs to be in a separate patch?
> 
> Yeah, it can be a separate refactor patch.
> 
> 
> > > +static inline bool
> > > +xfs_quota_timer_exceeded(
> > > +	time64_t		timer)
> > > +{
> > > +	return timer != 0 && get_seconds() > timer;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > >   * This reserves disk blocks and inodes against a dquot.
> > >   * Flags indicate if the dquot is to be locked here and also
> > > @@ -580,7 +588,7 @@ xfs_trans_dqresv(
> > >  {
> > >  	xfs_qcnt_t		hardlimit;
> > >  	xfs_qcnt_t		softlimit;
> > > -	time_t			timer;
> > > +	time64_t		timer;
> > 
> > <this needs rebasing I guess, after b8a0880a37e2f43aa3bcd147182e95a4ebd82279>
> 
> Probably. :)
> 
> > >  	xfs_qwarncnt_t		warns;
> > >  	xfs_qwarncnt_t		warnlimit;
> > >  	xfs_qcnt_t		total_count;
> > > @@ -635,7 +643,7 @@ xfs_trans_dqresv(
> > >  				goto error_return;
> > >  			}
> > >  			if (softlimit && total_count > softlimit) {
> > > -				if ((timer != 0 && get_seconds() > timer) ||
> > > +				if (xfs_quota_timer_exceeded(timer) ||
> > >  				    (warns != 0 && warns >= warnlimit)) {
> > >  					xfs_quota_warn(mp, dqp,
> > >  						       QUOTA_NL_BSOFTLONGWARN);
> > > @@ -662,8 +670,8 @@ xfs_trans_dqresv(
> > >  				goto error_return;
> > >  			}
> > >  			if (softlimit && total_count > softlimit) {
> > > -				if  ((timer != 0 && get_seconds() > timer) ||
> > > -				     (warns != 0 && warns >= warnlimit)) {
> > > +				if (xfs_quota_timer_exceeded(timer) ||
> > > +				    (warns != 0 && warns >= warnlimit)) {
> > 
> > TBH don't really see the point of this refactoring/helper, especially if not
> > done for warns.  I think open coding is fine.
> 
> Yeah, in the end the helper doesn't add a lot anymore.  IIRC it did in
> previous versions of this patch.
> 
> --D
> 
> > >  					xfs_quota_warn(mp, dqp,
> > >  						       QUOTA_NL_ISOFTLONGWARN);
> > >  					goto error_return;
> > > 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-13  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-01  1:11 [PATCH 00/14] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038 Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 01/14] xfs: explicitly define inode timestamp range Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 23:00   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13  1:26     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13  1:50       ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13  1:53         ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 02/14] xfs: preserve default grace interval during quotacheck Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 23:35   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-19  4:55   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-03-03  3:03     ` Eric Sandeen
2020-03-03 15:48       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-03-03 15:52         ` Eric Sandeen
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 03/14] xfs: refactor quota exceeded test Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 23:51   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13  1:41     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13  1:52       ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13  1:59         ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-31 14:04       ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 04/14] xfs: fix quota timer inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-31 15:04   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-01 23:56     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 05/14] xfs: refactor quota expiration timer modification Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 23:57   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13  1:46     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13  3:27       ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13  3:32         ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13  5:33           ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 06/14] xfs: refactor default quota grace period setting code Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13  0:15   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13  1:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13  2:03       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 07/14] xfs: remove xfs_timestamp_t Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 08/14] xfs: move xfs_log_dinode_to_disk to the log code Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:11 ` [PATCH 09/14] xfs: refactor timestamp coding Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:12 ` [PATCH 10/14] xfs: convert struct xfs_timestamp to union Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:12 ` [PATCH 11/14] xfs: widen ondisk timestamps to deal with y2038 problem Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-31 12:30   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-01 23:17     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-02  4:26       ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-01  1:12 ` [PATCH 12/14] xfs: cache quota grace period expiration times incore Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01  1:12 ` [PATCH 13/14] xfs: enable bigtime for quota timers Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-31 17:07   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-02  0:09     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-02  4:04       ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-01  1:12 ` [PATCH 14/14] xfs: enable big timestamps Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-26  9:20 ` [PATCH 00/14] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038 Amir Goldstein
2020-05-26 15:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-26 16:42     ` Amir Goldstein
2020-05-31 17:31       ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-02  0:09         ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200213020342.GC6870@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).