From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 19:42:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxgq+i1+q1=_bT=M_HoWWMuDaA8dqQK3m+iJZ8d+LBgA0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526155724.GJ8230@magnolia>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:59 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:20:59PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 3:11 AM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This series performs some refactoring of our timestamp and inode
> > > encoding functions, then retrofits the timestamp union to handle
> > > timestamps as a 64-bit nanosecond counter. Next, it refactors the quota
> > > grace period expiration timer code a bit before implementing bit
> > > shifting to widen the effective counter size to 34 bits. This enables
> > > correct time handling on XFS through the year 2486.
> > >
> >
> > I intend to start review of this series.
> > I intend to focus on correctness of conversions and on backward
> > forward compatibility.
> >
> > I saw Eric's comments on quota patches and that you mentioned
> > you addressed some of them. I do not intend to review correctness
> > of existing quota code anyway ;-)
> >
> > I see that you updated the branch 3 days ago and that patch 2/14
> > was dropped. I assume the rest of the series is mostly unchanged,
> > but I can verify that before reviewing each patch.
> >
> > As far as you are concerned, should I wait for v2 or can I continue
> > to review this series?
>
> I plan to rebase the whole series after 5.8-rc1, but if you'd like to
> look at the higher level details (particularly in the quota code, which
> is a bit murky) sooner than later, I don't mind emailing out what I have
> now.
>
No need. I can look at high level details on your branch.
Will hold off review comments until rebase unless I find something
that calls for your attention.
Thanks,
Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-01 1:11 [PATCH 00/14] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038 Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 01/14] xfs: explicitly define inode timestamp range Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 23:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13 1:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13 1:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13 1:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 02/14] xfs: preserve default grace interval during quotacheck Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 23:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-19 4:55 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-03-03 3:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-03-03 15:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-03-03 15:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 03/14] xfs: refactor quota exceeded test Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 23:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13 1:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13 1:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13 1:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-31 14:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 04/14] xfs: fix quota timer inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-31 15:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-01 23:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 05/14] xfs: refactor quota expiration timer modification Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 23:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13 3:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13 3:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13 5:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 06/14] xfs: refactor default quota grace period setting code Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13 0:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-13 1:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13 2:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 07/14] xfs: remove xfs_timestamp_t Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 08/14] xfs: move xfs_log_dinode_to_disk to the log code Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:11 ` [PATCH 09/14] xfs: refactor timestamp coding Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:12 ` [PATCH 10/14] xfs: convert struct xfs_timestamp to union Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:12 ` [PATCH 11/14] xfs: widen ondisk timestamps to deal with y2038 problem Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-31 12:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-01 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-02 4:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-01 1:12 ` [PATCH 12/14] xfs: cache quota grace period expiration times incore Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:12 ` [PATCH 13/14] xfs: enable bigtime for quota timers Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-31 17:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-02 0:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-02 4:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-01 1:12 ` [PATCH 14/14] xfs: enable big timestamps Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-26 9:20 ` [PATCH 00/14] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038 Amir Goldstein
2020-05-26 15:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-26 16:42 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2020-05-31 17:31 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-02 0:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOQ4uxgq+i1+q1=_bT=M_HoWWMuDaA8dqQK3m+iJZ8d+LBgA0w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).