linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Li <lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <david@fromorbit.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, <lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	<y-goto@fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: Handle I_DONTCACHE in iput_final() instead of generic_drop_inode()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:13:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831101313.168889-1-lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)

If generic_drop_inode() returns true, it means iput_final() can evict
this inode regardless of whether it is dirty or not. If we check
I_DONTCACHE in generic_drop_inode(), any inode with this bit set will be
evicted unconditionally. This is not the desired behavior because
I_DONTCACHE only means the inode shouldn't be cached on the LRU list.
As for whether we need to evict this inode, this is what
generic_drop_inode() should do. This patch corrects the usage of
I_DONTCACHE.

This patch was proposed in [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200831003407.GE12096@dread.disaster.area/

Signed-off-by: Hao Li <lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/inode.c         | 3 ++-
 include/linux/fs.h | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 72c4c347afb7..4e45d5ea3d0f 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1625,7 +1625,8 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
 	else
 		drop = generic_drop_inode(inode);
 
-	if (!drop && (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) {
+	if (!drop && !(inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE) &&
+			(sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) {
 		inode_add_lru(inode);
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 		return;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index e019ea2f1347..93caee80ce47 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2922,8 +2922,7 @@ extern int inode_needs_sync(struct inode *inode);
 extern int generic_delete_inode(struct inode *inode);
 static inline int generic_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode) ||
-		(inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE);
+	return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode);
 }
 extern void d_mark_dontcache(struct inode *inode);
 
-- 
2.28.0




             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-31 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-31 10:13 Hao Li [this message]
2020-08-31 17:12 ` [PATCH] fs: Handle I_DONTCACHE in iput_final() instead of generic_drop_inode() Ira Weiny
2020-09-01  3:48   ` Li, Hao
2020-09-03 21:58 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-04  7:07   ` Li, Hao
2020-11-10  2:56 Hao Li
2020-12-08  2:08 Hao Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200831101313.168889-1-lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).