linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v9 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores
@ 2020-10-06 19:15 Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Pavel Reichl
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Reichl @ 2020-10-06 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

Remove some wrappers that we have in XFS around the read-write semaphore
locks.

The goal of this cleanup is to remove mrlock_t structure and its mr*()
wrapper functions and replace it with native rw_semaphore type and its
native calls.

Changes in version 8:
* Patchset was rebased so it applies cleanly.
* The patch 'xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores' contains change in
xfs_btree.c which transfers ownership of lock so lockdep won't assert
(This was reported by Darrick and proposed change fixes this issue).

Changes in version 9:
*Fixed white space in patch 'xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked()'
*Updated code comments as suggested by djwong (thanks!) in patch: 'xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores'

Pavel Reichl (4):
  xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked()
  xfs: clean up whitespace in xfs_isilocked() calls
  xfs: xfs_isilocked() can only check a single lock type
  xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c  |   8 +--
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c |  14 ++++++
 fs/xfs/mrlock.h           |  78 -----------------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c         |   3 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c        | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h        |  25 ++++++----
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c         |   4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h        |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c           |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c        |   6 +--
 10 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/mrlock.h

-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v9 1/4] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked()
  2020-10-06 19:15 [PATCH v9 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores Pavel Reichl
@ 2020-10-06 19:15 ` Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] xfs: clean up whitespace in xfs_isilocked() calls Pavel Reichl
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Reichl @ 2020-10-06 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

Refactor xfs_isilocked() to use newly introduced __xfs_rwsem_islocked().
__xfs_rwsem_islocked() is a helper function which encapsulates checking
state of rw_semaphores hold by inode.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 21 ++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index c06129cffba9..f3b3821e3c35 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -345,32 +345,62 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
 }
 
 #if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-int
+static inline bool
+__xfs_rwsem_islocked(
+	struct rw_semaphore	*rwsem,
+	int			lock_flags)
+{
+	int			arg;
+
+	if (!debug_locks)
+		return rwsem_is_locked(rwsem);
+
+	if (lock_flags & (1 << XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT)) {
+		/*
+		 * The caller could be asking if we have (shared | excl)
+		 * access to the lock. Ask lockdep if the rwsem is
+		 * locked either for read or write access.
+		 *
+		 * The caller could also be asking if we have only
+		 * shared access to the lock. Holding a rwsem
+		 * write-locked implies read access as well, so the
+		 * request to lockdep is the same for this case.
+		 */
+		arg = -1;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * The caller is asking if we have only exclusive access
+		 * to the lock. Ask lockdep if the rwsem is locked for
+		 * write access.
+		 */
+		arg = 0;
+	}
+
+	return lockdep_is_held_type(rwsem, arg);
+}
+
+bool
 xfs_isilocked(
-	xfs_inode_t		*ip,
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
 	uint			lock_flags)
 {
-	if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
-		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED))
-			return !!ip->i_lock.mr_writer;
-		return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock);
+	if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
+		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&ip->i_lock,
+				(lock_flags >> XFS_ILOCK_FLAG_SHIFT));
 	}
 
-	if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) {
-		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED))
-			return !!ip->i_mmaplock.mr_writer;
-		return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_mmaplock.mr_lock);
+	if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) {
+		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&ip->i_mmaplock,
+				(lock_flags >> XFS_MMAPLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT));
 	}
 
-	if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
-		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED))
-			return !debug_locks ||
-				lockdep_is_held_type(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem, 0);
-		return rwsem_is_locked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
+	if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
+		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem,
+				(lock_flags >> XFS_IOLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT));
 	}
 
 	ASSERT(0);
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index e9a8bb184d1f..77d5655191ab 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -268,12 +268,19 @@ static inline void xfs_ifunlock(struct xfs_inode *ip)
  * Bit ranges:	1<<1  - 1<<16-1 -- iolock/ilock modes (bitfield)
  *		1<<16 - 1<<32-1 -- lockdep annotation (integers)
  */
-#define	XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL		(1<<0)
-#define	XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED	(1<<1)
-#define	XFS_ILOCK_EXCL		(1<<2)
-#define	XFS_ILOCK_SHARED	(1<<3)
-#define	XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL	(1<<4)
-#define	XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED	(1<<5)
+
+#define XFS_IOLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT	0
+#define XFS_ILOCK_FLAG_SHIFT	2
+#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT	4
+
+#define XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT	1
+
+#define XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL		(1 << (XFS_IOLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT))
+#define XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED	(XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL << (XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT))
+#define XFS_ILOCK_EXCL		(1 << (XFS_ILOCK_FLAG_SHIFT))
+#define XFS_ILOCK_SHARED	(XFS_ILOCK_EXCL << (XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT))
+#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL	(1 << (XFS_MMAPLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT))
+#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED	(XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL << (XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT))
 
 #define XFS_LOCK_MASK		(XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED \
 				| XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED \
@@ -412,7 +419,7 @@ void		xfs_ilock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 int		xfs_ilock_nowait(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 void		xfs_iunlock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 void		xfs_ilock_demote(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
-int		xfs_isilocked(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
+bool		xfs_isilocked(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 uint		xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
 uint		xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v9 2/4] xfs: clean up whitespace in xfs_isilocked() calls
  2020-10-06 19:15 [PATCH v9 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Pavel Reichl
@ 2020-10-06 19:15 ` Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] xfs: xfs_isilocked() can only check a single lock type Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores Pavel Reichl
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Reichl @ 2020-10-06 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

Make whitespace follow the same pattern in all xfs_isilocked() calls.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c        | 3 ++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c       | 4 ++--
 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c          | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 1b0a01b06a05..ced3b996cd8a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -3883,7 +3883,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_read(
 
 	ASSERT(*nmap >= 1);
 	ASSERT(!(flags & ~(XFS_BMAPI_ATTRFORK | XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE)));
-	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ifp))
 		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index a29f78a663ca..c8b1d4e4199a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -763,7 +763,8 @@ xfs_break_layouts(
 	bool			retry;
 	int			error;
 
-	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(XFS_I(inode), XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(XFS_I(inode),
+			XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
 
 	do {
 		retry = false;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index f3b3821e3c35..035925d406d5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -2779,7 +2779,7 @@ static void
 xfs_iunpin(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
 {
-	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED));
 
 	trace_xfs_inode_unpin_nowait(ip, _RET_IP_);
 
@@ -3472,7 +3472,7 @@ xfs_iflush(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
 	int			error;
 
-	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED));
 	ASSERT(xfs_isiflocked(ip));
 	ASSERT(ip->i_df.if_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE ||
 	       ip->i_df.if_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK));
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
index be67570badf8..57bfa5266c47 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
@@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve(
 	int			error;
 
 
-	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED));
 	ASSERT(XFS_IS_QUOTA_RUNNING(mp));
 
 	delblks = ip->i_delayed_blks;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v9 3/4] xfs: xfs_isilocked() can only check a single lock type
  2020-10-06 19:15 [PATCH v9 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] xfs: clean up whitespace in xfs_isilocked() calls Pavel Reichl
@ 2020-10-06 19:15 ` Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores Pavel Reichl
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Reichl @ 2020-10-06 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

In its current form, xfs_isilocked() is only able to test one lock type
at a time - ilock, iolock, or mmap lock, but combinations are not
properly handled. The intent here is to check that both XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL
and XFS_ILOCK_EXCL are held, so test them each separately.

The commit ecfea3f0c8c6 ("xfs: split xfs_bmap_shift_extents") ORed the
flags together which was an error, so this patch reverts that part of
the change and check the locks independently.

Fixes: ecfea3f0c8c6 ("xfs: split xfs_bmap_shift_extents")

Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index ced3b996cd8a..ff5cc8a5d476 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -5787,7 +5787,8 @@ xfs_bmap_collapse_extents(
 	if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
 
 	if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) {
 		error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, whichfork);
@@ -5904,7 +5905,8 @@ xfs_bmap_insert_extents(
 	if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
 
 	if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) {
 		error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, whichfork);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores
  2020-10-06 19:15 [PATCH v9 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores Pavel Reichl
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] xfs: xfs_isilocked() can only check a single lock type Pavel Reichl
@ 2020-10-06 19:15 ` Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-07  1:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Reichl @ 2020-10-06 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

Remove mrlock_t as it does not provide any extra value over
rw_semaphores. Make i_lock and i_mmaplock native rw_semaphores and
replace mr*() functions with native rwsem calls.

Release the lock in xfs_btree_split() just before the work-queue
executing xfs_btree_split_worker() is scheduled and make
xfs_btree_split_worker() to acquire the lock as a first thing and
release it just before returning from the function. This it done so the
ownership of the lock is transfered between kernel threads and thus
lockdep won't complain about lock being held by a different kernel
thread.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 14 +++++++
 fs/xfs/mrlock.h           | 78 ---------------------------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c        | 36 ++++++++++--------
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h        |  4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c         |  4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h        |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c        |  6 +--
 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/mrlock.h

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
index 2d25bab68764..1d1bb8423688 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
@@ -2816,6 +2816,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
 	unsigned long		pflags;
 	unsigned long		new_pflags = PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS;
 
+	rwsem_acquire(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
 	/*
 	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
 	 * in kswapd context, and hence we may need to inherit that state
@@ -2832,6 +2833,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
 	complete(args->done);
 
 	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
+	rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2863,8 +2865,20 @@ xfs_btree_split(
 	args.done = &done;
 	args.kswapd = current_is_kswapd();
 	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&args.work, xfs_btree_split_worker);
+	/*
+	 * Update lockdep's ownership information to reflect that we
+	 * will be transferring the ilock from this thread to the
+	 * worker.
+	 */
+	rwsem_release(&cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
 	queue_work(xfs_alloc_wq, &args.work);
 	wait_for_completion(&done);
+	/*
+	 * Update lockdep's lock ownership information to point to
+	 * this thread as the lock owner now that the worker item is
+	 * done.
+	 */
+	rwsem_acquire(&cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
 	destroy_work_on_stack(&args.work);
 	return args.result;
 }
diff --git a/fs/xfs/mrlock.h b/fs/xfs/mrlock.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 79155eec341b..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/mrlock.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-/*
- * Copyright (c) 2000-2006 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
- * All Rights Reserved.
- */
-#ifndef __XFS_SUPPORT_MRLOCK_H__
-#define __XFS_SUPPORT_MRLOCK_H__
-
-#include <linux/rwsem.h>
-
-typedef struct {
-	struct rw_semaphore	mr_lock;
-#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-	int			mr_writer;
-#endif
-} mrlock_t;
-
-#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-#define mrinit(mrp, name)	\
-	do { (mrp)->mr_writer = 0; init_rwsem(&(mrp)->mr_lock); } while (0)
-#else
-#define mrinit(mrp, name)	\
-	do { init_rwsem(&(mrp)->mr_lock); } while (0)
-#endif
-
-#define mrlock_init(mrp, t,n,s)	mrinit(mrp, n)
-#define mrfree(mrp)		do { } while (0)
-
-static inline void mraccess_nested(mrlock_t *mrp, int subclass)
-{
-	down_read_nested(&mrp->mr_lock, subclass);
-}
-
-static inline void mrupdate_nested(mrlock_t *mrp, int subclass)
-{
-	down_write_nested(&mrp->mr_lock, subclass);
-#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-	mrp->mr_writer = 1;
-#endif
-}
-
-static inline int mrtryaccess(mrlock_t *mrp)
-{
-	return down_read_trylock(&mrp->mr_lock);
-}
-
-static inline int mrtryupdate(mrlock_t *mrp)
-{
-	if (!down_write_trylock(&mrp->mr_lock))
-		return 0;
-#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-	mrp->mr_writer = 1;
-#endif
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static inline void mrunlock_excl(mrlock_t *mrp)
-{
-#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-	mrp->mr_writer = 0;
-#endif
-	up_write(&mrp->mr_lock);
-}
-
-static inline void mrunlock_shared(mrlock_t *mrp)
-{
-	up_read(&mrp->mr_lock);
-}
-
-static inline void mrdemote(mrlock_t *mrp)
-{
-#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-	mrp->mr_writer = 0;
-#endif
-	downgrade_write(&mrp->mr_lock);
-}
-
-#endif /* __XFS_SUPPORT_MRLOCK_H__ */
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 035925d406d5..213a4a947854 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -191,14 +191,15 @@ xfs_ilock(
 	}
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
-		mrupdate_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
+		down_write_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock,
+				XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
 	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
-		mraccess_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
+		down_read_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
-		mrupdate_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
+		down_write_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
 	else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)
-		mraccess_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
+		down_read_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -242,27 +243,27 @@ xfs_ilock_nowait(
 	}
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL) {
-		if (!mrtryupdate(&ip->i_mmaplock))
+		if (!down_write_trylock(&ip->i_mmaplock))
 			goto out_undo_iolock;
 	} else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED) {
-		if (!mrtryaccess(&ip->i_mmaplock))
+		if (!down_read_trylock(&ip->i_mmaplock))
 			goto out_undo_iolock;
 	}
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL) {
-		if (!mrtryupdate(&ip->i_lock))
+		if (!down_write_trylock(&ip->i_lock))
 			goto out_undo_mmaplock;
 	} else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED) {
-		if (!mrtryaccess(&ip->i_lock))
+		if (!down_read_trylock(&ip->i_lock))
 			goto out_undo_mmaplock;
 	}
 	return 1;
 
 out_undo_mmaplock:
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
-		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		up_write(&ip->i_mmaplock);
 	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
-		mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		up_read(&ip->i_mmaplock);
 out_undo_iolock:
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
 		up_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
@@ -309,14 +310,14 @@ xfs_iunlock(
 		up_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
-		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		up_write(&ip->i_mmaplock);
 	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
-		mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		up_read(&ip->i_mmaplock);
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
-		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_lock);
+		up_write(&ip->i_lock);
 	else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)
-		mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_lock);
+		up_read(&ip->i_lock);
 
 	trace_xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags, _RET_IP_);
 }
@@ -335,9 +336,9 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
 		~(XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) == 0);
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
-		mrdemote(&ip->i_lock);
+		downgrade_write(&ip->i_lock);
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
-		mrdemote(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		downgrade_write(&ip->i_mmaplock);
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
 		downgrade_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
 
@@ -385,11 +386,14 @@ xfs_isilocked(
 	uint			lock_flags)
 {
 	if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
+		ASSERT(!(lock_flags & ~(XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)));
 		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&ip->i_lock,
 				(lock_flags >> XFS_ILOCK_FLAG_SHIFT));
 	}
 
 	if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) {
+		ASSERT(!(lock_flags &
+			~(XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)));
 		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&ip->i_mmaplock,
 				(lock_flags >> XFS_MMAPLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT));
 	}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index 77d5655191ab..02c98ecfe4c5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ typedef struct xfs_inode {
 
 	/* Transaction and locking information. */
 	struct xfs_inode_log_item *i_itemp;	/* logging information */
-	mrlock_t		i_lock;		/* inode lock */
-	mrlock_t		i_mmaplock;	/* inode mmap IO lock */
+	struct rw_semaphore	i_lock;		/* inode lock */
+	struct rw_semaphore	i_mmaplock;	/* inode mmap IO lock */
 	atomic_t		i_pincount;	/* inode pin count */
 
 	/*
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index 80a13c8561d8..66cca3e599c7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@ -1336,9 +1336,9 @@ xfs_setup_inode(
 		 */
 		lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_rwsem,
 				  &inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key);
-		lockdep_set_class(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock, &xfs_dir_ilock_class);
+		lockdep_set_class(&ip->i_lock, &xfs_dir_ilock_class);
 	} else {
-		lockdep_set_class(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock, &xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
+		lockdep_set_class(&ip->i_lock, &xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
 	}
 
 	/*
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
index ab737fed7b12..ba37217f86d2 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ typedef __u32			xfs_nlink_t;
 #include "xfs_types.h"
 
 #include "kmem.h"
-#include "mrlock.h"
 
 #include <linux/semaphore.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -61,6 +60,7 @@ typedef __u32			xfs_nlink_t;
 #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 #include <linux/rhashtable.h>
 #include <linux/xattr.h>
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
 
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/div64.h>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 71ac6c1cdc36..00be9cfa29fa 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -708,10 +708,8 @@ xfs_fs_inode_init_once(
 	atomic_set(&ip->i_pincount, 0);
 	spin_lock_init(&ip->i_flags_lock);
 
-	mrlock_init(&ip->i_mmaplock, MRLOCK_ALLOW_EQUAL_PRI|MRLOCK_BARRIER,
-		     "xfsino", ip->i_ino);
-	mrlock_init(&ip->i_lock, MRLOCK_ALLOW_EQUAL_PRI|MRLOCK_BARRIER,
-		     "xfsino", ip->i_ino);
+	init_rwsem(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+	init_rwsem(&ip->i_lock);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores
  2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores Pavel Reichl
@ 2020-10-07  1:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
  2020-10-07 14:17     ` Eric Sandeen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2020-10-07  1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Reichl; +Cc: linux-xfs

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> Remove mrlock_t as it does not provide any extra value over
> rw_semaphores. Make i_lock and i_mmaplock native rw_semaphores and
> replace mr*() functions with native rwsem calls.
> 
> Release the lock in xfs_btree_split() just before the work-queue
> executing xfs_btree_split_worker() is scheduled and make
> xfs_btree_split_worker() to acquire the lock as a first thing and
> release it just before returning from the function. This it done so the
> ownership of the lock is transfered between kernel threads and thus
> lockdep won't complain about lock being held by a different kernel
> thread.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 14 +++++++
>  fs/xfs/mrlock.h           | 78 ---------------------------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c        | 36 ++++++++++--------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h        |  4 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c         |  4 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h        |  2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c        |  6 +--
>  7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/mrlock.h
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> index 2d25bab68764..1d1bb8423688 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> @@ -2816,6 +2816,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>  	unsigned long		pflags;
>  	unsigned long		new_pflags = PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS;
>  
> +	rwsem_acquire(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);

These calls also need a comment explaining just what they're doing.

>  	/*
>  	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
>  	 * in kswapd context, and hence we may need to inherit that state
> @@ -2832,6 +2833,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>  	complete(args->done);
>  
>  	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
> +	rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);

Note that as soon as you call complete(), xfs_btree_split can wake up
and return, which means that *args could now point to reclaimed stack
space.  This leads to crashes and memory corruption in generic/562 on
a 1k block filesystem (though in principle this can happen anywhere):

[  227.611722] =====================================
[  227.612673] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
[  227.613539] 5.9.0-rc4-djw #rc4 Not tainted
[  227.614290] -------------------------------------
[  227.615141] kworker/1:25/12941 is trying to release lock (
[  227.615154] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x485fc44ba1158c55: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  227.617903] CPU: 1 PID: 12941 Comm: kworker/1:25 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc4-djw #rc4
[  227.619171] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[  227.620731] Workqueue: xfsalloc xfs_btree_split_worker [xfs]
[  227.621749] RIP: 0010:print_unlock_imbalance_bug.cold+0x4e/0xb4
[  227.622800] Code: e8 d4 fb ff ff 48 c7 c7 78 7a e1 81 e8 0a d0 00 00 8b 95 d0 04 00 00 48 8d b5 e0 06 00 00 48 c7 c7 a8 7a e1 81 e8 f1 cf 00 00 <48> 8b 73 18 48 8b 3b e8 ba fd ff ff 48 c7 c7 6b 74 e1 81 e8 d9
 cf
[  227.625977] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001927dd0 EFLAGS: 00010046
[  227.626915] RAX: 000000000000002e RBX: 485fc44ba1158c55 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  227.628177] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff810e7d5f RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[  227.629434] RBP: ffff8880304ac000 R08: 00000034feeb6ecf R09: 0000000000000001
[  227.630678] R10: 0000000000000046 R11: ffffffff83204b74 R12: ffffffffa037ff3b
[  227.631922] R13: ffffffffa037ff3b R14: 0000000000000246 R15: 0000000000000003
[  227.633181] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88803ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  227.634595] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  227.635615] CR2: 00007ff762201d90 CR3: 0000000077756001 CR4: 00000000001706a0
[  227.636869] Call Trace:
[  227.637360]  lock_release+0x169/0x3f0
[  227.638043]  process_one_work+0x23b/0x5a0
[  227.638782]  worker_thread+0x54/0x3a0
[  227.639468]  ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[  227.640193]  kthread+0x13c/0x180
[  227.640754]  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
[  227.641392]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[  227.642005] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor zstd_compress lzo_compress lzo_decompress zlib_deflate raid6_pq dm_flakey xfs libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_REDIRECT ip_set_hash_ip ip_set_hash_net xt_tcpudp xt_set iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set_hash_mac ip_set nfnetlink ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter bfq sch_fq_codel ip_tables x_tables overlay nfsv4 af_packet [last unloaded: scsi_debug]
[  227.648071] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[  227.648590]    (ftrace buffer empty)
[  227.649135] ---[ end trace 91c58b635eaa3d46 ]---
[  227.649792] RIP: 0010:print_unlock_imbalance_bug.cold+0x4e/0xb4

Also, reverting just this patch leads to compilation errors.

--D

>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2863,8 +2865,20 @@ xfs_btree_split(
>  	args.done = &done;
>  	args.kswapd = current_is_kswapd();
>  	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&args.work, xfs_btree_split_worker);
> +	/*
> +	 * Update lockdep's ownership information to reflect that we
> +	 * will be transferring the ilock from this thread to the
> +	 * worker.
> +	 */
> +	rwsem_release(&cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
>  	queue_work(xfs_alloc_wq, &args.work);
>  	wait_for_completion(&done);
> +	/*
> +	 * Update lockdep's lock ownership information to point to
> +	 * this thread as the lock owner now that the worker item is
> +	 * done.
> +	 */
> +	rwsem_acquire(&cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
>  	destroy_work_on_stack(&args.work);
>  	return args.result;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/mrlock.h b/fs/xfs/mrlock.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 79155eec341b..000000000000
> --- a/fs/xfs/mrlock.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -/*
> - * Copyright (c) 2000-2006 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
> - * All Rights Reserved.
> - */
> -#ifndef __XFS_SUPPORT_MRLOCK_H__
> -#define __XFS_SUPPORT_MRLOCK_H__
> -
> -#include <linux/rwsem.h>
> -
> -typedef struct {
> -	struct rw_semaphore	mr_lock;
> -#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> -	int			mr_writer;
> -#endif
> -} mrlock_t;
> -
> -#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> -#define mrinit(mrp, name)	\
> -	do { (mrp)->mr_writer = 0; init_rwsem(&(mrp)->mr_lock); } while (0)
> -#else
> -#define mrinit(mrp, name)	\
> -	do { init_rwsem(&(mrp)->mr_lock); } while (0)
> -#endif
> -
> -#define mrlock_init(mrp, t,n,s)	mrinit(mrp, n)
> -#define mrfree(mrp)		do { } while (0)
> -
> -static inline void mraccess_nested(mrlock_t *mrp, int subclass)
> -{
> -	down_read_nested(&mrp->mr_lock, subclass);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void mrupdate_nested(mrlock_t *mrp, int subclass)
> -{
> -	down_write_nested(&mrp->mr_lock, subclass);
> -#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> -	mrp->mr_writer = 1;
> -#endif
> -}
> -
> -static inline int mrtryaccess(mrlock_t *mrp)
> -{
> -	return down_read_trylock(&mrp->mr_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static inline int mrtryupdate(mrlock_t *mrp)
> -{
> -	if (!down_write_trylock(&mrp->mr_lock))
> -		return 0;
> -#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> -	mrp->mr_writer = 1;
> -#endif
> -	return 1;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void mrunlock_excl(mrlock_t *mrp)
> -{
> -#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> -	mrp->mr_writer = 0;
> -#endif
> -	up_write(&mrp->mr_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void mrunlock_shared(mrlock_t *mrp)
> -{
> -	up_read(&mrp->mr_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void mrdemote(mrlock_t *mrp)
> -{
> -#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> -	mrp->mr_writer = 0;
> -#endif
> -	downgrade_write(&mrp->mr_lock);
> -}
> -
> -#endif /* __XFS_SUPPORT_MRLOCK_H__ */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 035925d406d5..213a4a947854 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -191,14 +191,15 @@ xfs_ilock(
>  	}
>  
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
> -		mrupdate_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
> +		down_write_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock,
> +				XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
>  	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
> -		mraccess_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
> +		down_read_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
>  
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
> -		mrupdate_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
> +		down_write_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
>  	else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)
> -		mraccess_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
> +		down_read_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -242,27 +243,27 @@ xfs_ilock_nowait(
>  	}
>  
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL) {
> -		if (!mrtryupdate(&ip->i_mmaplock))
> +		if (!down_write_trylock(&ip->i_mmaplock))
>  			goto out_undo_iolock;
>  	} else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED) {
> -		if (!mrtryaccess(&ip->i_mmaplock))
> +		if (!down_read_trylock(&ip->i_mmaplock))
>  			goto out_undo_iolock;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL) {
> -		if (!mrtryupdate(&ip->i_lock))
> +		if (!down_write_trylock(&ip->i_lock))
>  			goto out_undo_mmaplock;
>  	} else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED) {
> -		if (!mrtryaccess(&ip->i_lock))
> +		if (!down_read_trylock(&ip->i_lock))
>  			goto out_undo_mmaplock;
>  	}
>  	return 1;
>  
>  out_undo_mmaplock:
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
> -		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> +		up_write(&ip->i_mmaplock);
>  	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
> -		mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> +		up_read(&ip->i_mmaplock);
>  out_undo_iolock:
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
>  		up_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
> @@ -309,14 +310,14 @@ xfs_iunlock(
>  		up_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
>  
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
> -		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> +		up_write(&ip->i_mmaplock);
>  	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
> -		mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> +		up_read(&ip->i_mmaplock);
>  
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
> -		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_lock);
> +		up_write(&ip->i_lock);
>  	else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)
> -		mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_lock);
> +		up_read(&ip->i_lock);
>  
>  	trace_xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags, _RET_IP_);
>  }
> @@ -335,9 +336,9 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
>  		~(XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) == 0);
>  
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
> -		mrdemote(&ip->i_lock);
> +		downgrade_write(&ip->i_lock);
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
> -		mrdemote(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> +		downgrade_write(&ip->i_mmaplock);
>  	if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
>  		downgrade_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
>  
> @@ -385,11 +386,14 @@ xfs_isilocked(
>  	uint			lock_flags)
>  {
>  	if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
> +		ASSERT(!(lock_flags & ~(XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)));
>  		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&ip->i_lock,
>  				(lock_flags >> XFS_ILOCK_FLAG_SHIFT));
>  	}
>  
>  	if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) {
> +		ASSERT(!(lock_flags &
> +			~(XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)));
>  		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&ip->i_mmaplock,
>  				(lock_flags >> XFS_MMAPLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT));
>  	}
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> index 77d5655191ab..02c98ecfe4c5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> @@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ typedef struct xfs_inode {
>  
>  	/* Transaction and locking information. */
>  	struct xfs_inode_log_item *i_itemp;	/* logging information */
> -	mrlock_t		i_lock;		/* inode lock */
> -	mrlock_t		i_mmaplock;	/* inode mmap IO lock */
> +	struct rw_semaphore	i_lock;		/* inode lock */
> +	struct rw_semaphore	i_mmaplock;	/* inode mmap IO lock */
>  	atomic_t		i_pincount;	/* inode pin count */
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index 80a13c8561d8..66cca3e599c7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -1336,9 +1336,9 @@ xfs_setup_inode(
>  		 */
>  		lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_rwsem,
>  				  &inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key);
> -		lockdep_set_class(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock, &xfs_dir_ilock_class);
> +		lockdep_set_class(&ip->i_lock, &xfs_dir_ilock_class);
>  	} else {
> -		lockdep_set_class(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock, &xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
> +		lockdep_set_class(&ip->i_lock, &xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
> index ab737fed7b12..ba37217f86d2 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ typedef __u32			xfs_nlink_t;
>  #include "xfs_types.h"
>  
>  #include "kmem.h"
> -#include "mrlock.h"
>  
>  #include <linux/semaphore.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
> @@ -61,6 +60,7 @@ typedef __u32			xfs_nlink_t;
>  #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
>  #include <linux/rhashtable.h>
>  #include <linux/xattr.h>
> +#include <linux/rwsem.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/page.h>
>  #include <asm/div64.h>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index 71ac6c1cdc36..00be9cfa29fa 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -708,10 +708,8 @@ xfs_fs_inode_init_once(
>  	atomic_set(&ip->i_pincount, 0);
>  	spin_lock_init(&ip->i_flags_lock);
>  
> -	mrlock_init(&ip->i_mmaplock, MRLOCK_ALLOW_EQUAL_PRI|MRLOCK_BARRIER,
> -		     "xfsino", ip->i_ino);
> -	mrlock_init(&ip->i_lock, MRLOCK_ALLOW_EQUAL_PRI|MRLOCK_BARRIER,
> -		     "xfsino", ip->i_ino);
> +	init_rwsem(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> +	init_rwsem(&ip->i_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores
  2020-10-07  1:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2020-10-07 14:17     ` Eric Sandeen
  2020-10-07 15:25       ` Darrick J. Wong
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2020-10-07 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Darrick J. Wong, Pavel Reichl; +Cc: linux-xfs

On 10/6/20 8:21 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> Remove mrlock_t as it does not provide any extra value over
>> rw_semaphores. Make i_lock and i_mmaplock native rw_semaphores and
>> replace mr*() functions with native rwsem calls.
>>
>> Release the lock in xfs_btree_split() just before the work-queue
>> executing xfs_btree_split_worker() is scheduled and make
>> xfs_btree_split_worker() to acquire the lock as a first thing and
>> release it just before returning from the function. This it done so the
>> ownership of the lock is transfered between kernel threads and thus
>> lockdep won't complain about lock being held by a different kernel
>> thread.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 14 +++++++
>>  fs/xfs/mrlock.h           | 78 ---------------------------------------
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c        | 36 ++++++++++--------
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h        |  4 +-
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c         |  4 +-
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h        |  2 +-
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c        |  6 +--
>>  7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/mrlock.h
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>> index 2d25bab68764..1d1bb8423688 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>> @@ -2816,6 +2816,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>>  	unsigned long		pflags;
>>  	unsigned long		new_pflags = PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS;
>>  
>> +	rwsem_acquire(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> These calls also need a comment explaining just what they're doing.
> 
>>  	/*
>>  	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
>>  	 * in kswapd context, and hence we may need to inherit that state
>> @@ -2832,6 +2833,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>>  	complete(args->done);
>>  
>>  	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
>> +	rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> Note that as soon as you call complete(), xfs_btree_split can wake up
> and return, which means that *args could now point to reclaimed stack
> space.  This leads to crashes and memory corruption in generic/562 on
> a 1k block filesystem (though in principle this can happen anywhere):


What's the right way out of this; store *ip when we enter the function
and use that to get to the map, rather than args i guess?

Thanks,
-Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores
  2020-10-07 14:17     ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2020-10-07 15:25       ` Darrick J. Wong
  2020-10-07 21:15         ` Pavel Reichl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2020-10-07 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Pavel Reichl, linux-xfs

On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 09:17:13AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 10/6/20 8:21 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >> Remove mrlock_t as it does not provide any extra value over
> >> rw_semaphores. Make i_lock and i_mmaplock native rw_semaphores and
> >> replace mr*() functions with native rwsem calls.
> >>
> >> Release the lock in xfs_btree_split() just before the work-queue
> >> executing xfs_btree_split_worker() is scheduled and make
> >> xfs_btree_split_worker() to acquire the lock as a first thing and
> >> release it just before returning from the function. This it done so the
> >> ownership of the lock is transfered between kernel threads and thus
> >> lockdep won't complain about lock being held by a different kernel
> >> thread.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 14 +++++++
> >>  fs/xfs/mrlock.h           | 78 ---------------------------------------
> >>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c        | 36 ++++++++++--------
> >>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h        |  4 +-
> >>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c         |  4 +-
> >>  fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h        |  2 +-
> >>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c        |  6 +--
> >>  7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
> >>  delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/mrlock.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> >> index 2d25bab68764..1d1bb8423688 100644
> >> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> >> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> >> @@ -2816,6 +2816,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
> >>  	unsigned long		pflags;
> >>  	unsigned long		new_pflags = PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS;
> >>  
> >> +	rwsem_acquire(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> > These calls also need a comment explaining just what they're doing.
> > 
> >>  	/*
> >>  	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
> >>  	 * in kswapd context, and hence we may need to inherit that state
> >> @@ -2832,6 +2833,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
> >>  	complete(args->done);
> >>  
> >>  	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
> >> +	rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> > Note that as soon as you call complete(), xfs_btree_split can wake up
> > and return, which means that *args could now point to reclaimed stack
> > space.  This leads to crashes and memory corruption in generic/562 on
> > a 1k block filesystem (though in principle this can happen anywhere):
> 
> 
> What's the right way out of this; store *ip when we enter the function
> and use that to get to the map, rather than args i guess?

Er, no, because the worker could also get preempted right after
complete() and take so long to get rescheduled that the the inode have
been reclaimed.  Think about it -- the original thread is waiting on the
completion that it passed to the worker through $args, and therefore the
worker cannot touch any of the resources it was accessing through $args
after calling complete()....

--D

> Thanks,
> -Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores
  2020-10-07 15:25       ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2020-10-07 21:15         ` Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-07 21:55           ` Darrick J. Wong
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Reichl @ 2020-10-07 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Darrick J. Wong, Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-xfs



On 10/7/20 5:25 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 09:17:13AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 10/6/20 8:21 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>> Remove mrlock_t as it does not provide any extra value over
>>>> rw_semaphores. Make i_lock and i_mmaplock native rw_semaphores and
>>>> replace mr*() functions with native rwsem calls.
>>>>
>>>> Release the lock in xfs_btree_split() just before the work-queue
>>>> executing xfs_btree_split_worker() is scheduled and make
>>>> xfs_btree_split_worker() to acquire the lock as a first thing and
>>>> release it just before returning from the function. This it done so the
>>>> ownership of the lock is transfered between kernel threads and thus
>>>> lockdep won't complain about lock being held by a different kernel
>>>> thread.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 14 +++++++
>>>>  fs/xfs/mrlock.h           | 78 ---------------------------------------
>>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c        | 36 ++++++++++--------
>>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h        |  4 +-
>>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c         |  4 +-
>>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h        |  2 +-
>>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c        |  6 +--
>>>>  7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>>>>  delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/mrlock.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>>>> index 2d25bab68764..1d1bb8423688 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>>>> @@ -2816,6 +2816,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>>>>  	unsigned long		pflags;
>>>>  	unsigned long		new_pflags = PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS;
>>>>  
>>>> +	rwsem_acquire(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
>>> These calls also need a comment explaining just what they're doing.
>>>
>>>>  	/*
>>>>  	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
>>>>  	 * in kswapd context, and hence we may need to inherit that state
>>>> @@ -2832,6 +2833,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>>>>  	complete(args->done);
>>>>  
>>>>  	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
>>>> +	rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
>>> Note that as soon as you call complete(), xfs_btree_split can wake up
>>> and return, which means that *args could now point to reclaimed stack
>>> space.  This leads to crashes and memory corruption in generic/562 on
>>> a 1k block filesystem (though in principle this can happen anywhere):
>>
>>
>> What's the right way out of this; store *ip when we enter the function
>> and use that to get to the map, rather than args i guess?
> 
> Er, no, because the worker could also get preempted right after
> complete() and take so long to get rescheduled that the the inode have
> been reclaimed.  Think about it -- the original thread is waiting on the
> completion that it passed to the worker through $args, and therefore the
> worker cannot touch any of the resources it was accessing through $args
> after calling complete()....

Hi,

thanks for the comments, however for some reason I cannot reproduce the same memory corruption you are getting.

Do you think that moving the 'rwsem_release()' right before the 'complete()' should fix the problem?

Something like:


+       /*
+        * Update lockdep's lock ownership information to point to
+        * this thread as the thread that scheduled this worker is waiting
+        * for it's completion.
+        */
        rwsem_acquire(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
        /*
         * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
@@ -2830,10 +2835,15 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
 
        args->result = __xfs_btree_split(args->cur, args->level, args->ptrp,
                                         args->key, args->curp, args->stat);
+       /*
+        * Update lockdep's lock ownership information to reflect that we will
+        * be transferring the ilock from this worker back to the scheduling
+        * thread.
+        */
+       rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
        complete(args->done);
 
        current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
-       rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);



> 
> --D
> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Eric
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores
  2020-10-07 21:15         ` Pavel Reichl
@ 2020-10-07 21:55           ` Darrick J. Wong
  2020-10-08 13:55             ` Pavel Reichl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2020-10-07 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Reichl; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, linux-xfs

On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 11:15:32PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/7/20 5:25 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 09:17:13AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> On 10/6/20 8:21 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >>>> Remove mrlock_t as it does not provide any extra value over
> >>>> rw_semaphores. Make i_lock and i_mmaplock native rw_semaphores and
> >>>> replace mr*() functions with native rwsem calls.
> >>>>
> >>>> Release the lock in xfs_btree_split() just before the work-queue
> >>>> executing xfs_btree_split_worker() is scheduled and make
> >>>> xfs_btree_split_worker() to acquire the lock as a first thing and
> >>>> release it just before returning from the function. This it done so the
> >>>> ownership of the lock is transfered between kernel threads and thus
> >>>> lockdep won't complain about lock being held by a different kernel
> >>>> thread.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 14 +++++++
> >>>>  fs/xfs/mrlock.h           | 78 ---------------------------------------
> >>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c        | 36 ++++++++++--------
> >>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h        |  4 +-
> >>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c         |  4 +-
> >>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h        |  2 +-
> >>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c        |  6 +--
> >>>>  7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
> >>>>  delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/mrlock.h
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> >>>> index 2d25bab68764..1d1bb8423688 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> >>>> @@ -2816,6 +2816,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
> >>>>  	unsigned long		pflags;
> >>>>  	unsigned long		new_pflags = PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS;
> >>>>  
> >>>> +	rwsem_acquire(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> >>> These calls also need a comment explaining just what they're doing.
> >>>
> >>>>  	/*
> >>>>  	 * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
> >>>>  	 * in kswapd context, and hence we may need to inherit that state
> >>>> @@ -2832,6 +2833,7 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
> >>>>  	complete(args->done);
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
> >>>> +	rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> >>> Note that as soon as you call complete(), xfs_btree_split can wake up
> >>> and return, which means that *args could now point to reclaimed stack
> >>> space.  This leads to crashes and memory corruption in generic/562 on
> >>> a 1k block filesystem (though in principle this can happen anywhere):
> >>
> >>
> >> What's the right way out of this; store *ip when we enter the function
> >> and use that to get to the map, rather than args i guess?
> > 
> > Er, no, because the worker could also get preempted right after
> > complete() and take so long to get rescheduled that the the inode have
> > been reclaimed.  Think about it -- the original thread is waiting on the
> > completion that it passed to the worker through $args, and therefore the
> > worker cannot touch any of the resources it was accessing through $args
> > after calling complete()....
> 
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for the comments, however for some reason I cannot reproduce
> the same memory corruption you are getting.

<shrug> Do you have full preempt enabled?

> Do you think that moving the 'rwsem_release()' right before the
> 'complete()' should fix the problem?
> 
> Something like:
> 
> 
> +       /*
> +        * Update lockdep's lock ownership information to point to
> +        * this thread as the thread that scheduled this worker is waiting
> +        * for it's completion.

Nit: "it's" is always a contraction of "it is"; "its" is correct
(posessive) form here.

Otherwise, this looks fine to me.

--D

> +        */
>         rwsem_acquire(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
>         /*
>          * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
> @@ -2830,10 +2835,15 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
>  
>         args->result = __xfs_btree_split(args->cur, args->level, args->ptrp,
>                                          args->key, args->curp, args->stat);
> +       /*
> +        * Update lockdep's lock ownership information to reflect that we will
> +        * be transferring the ilock from this worker back to the scheduling
> +        * thread.
> +        */
> +       rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
>         complete(args->done);
>  
>         current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
> -       rwsem_release(&args->cur->bc_ino.ip->i_lock.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > --D
> > 
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Eric
> > 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores
  2020-10-07 21:55           ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2020-10-08 13:55             ` Pavel Reichl
  2020-10-08 16:16               ` Darrick J. Wong
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Reichl @ 2020-10-08 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, linux-xfs


>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for the comments, however for some reason I cannot reproduce
>> the same memory corruption you are getting.
> 
> <shrug> Do you have full preempt enabled?

Hi, I'm not proud to admit that until now I tested w/o 'CONFIG_PREEMPT=y' :-/
However at least now I can see the bug you hit and test that the proposed change in version #10 fixes that.


> 
>> Do you think that moving the 'rwsem_release()' right before the
>> 'complete()' should fix the problem?
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * Update lockdep's lock ownership information to point to
>> +        * this thread as the thread that scheduled this worker is waiting
>> +        * for it's completion.
> 
> Nit: "it's" is always a contraction of "it is"; "its" is correct
> (posessive) form here.

Thanks for noticing. I know the difference...but still I did this mistake. I must focus more next time.

> 
> Otherwise, this looks fine to me.

Thanks, version #10 is on list now.

Bye.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores
  2020-10-08 13:55             ` Pavel Reichl
@ 2020-10-08 16:16               ` Darrick J. Wong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2020-10-08 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Reichl; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, linux-xfs

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:55:16PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> 
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> thanks for the comments, however for some reason I cannot reproduce
> >> the same memory corruption you are getting.
> > 
> > <shrug> Do you have full preempt enabled?
> 
> Hi, I'm not proud to admit that until now I tested w/o 'CONFIG_PREEMPT=y' :-/
> However at least now I can see the bug you hit and test that the
> proposed change in version #10 fixes that.

<shrug> That just means you get to hit all the stall warnings (which are
fixable with cond_resched()) that I rarely see because preempt kernels
can reschedule at will... :)

> 
> 
> > 
> >> Do you think that moving the 'rwsem_release()' right before the
> >> 'complete()' should fix the problem?
> >>
> >> Something like:
> >>
> >>
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * Update lockdep's lock ownership information to point to
> >> +        * this thread as the thread that scheduled this worker is waiting
> >> +        * for it's completion.
> > 
> > Nit: "it's" is always a contraction of "it is"; "its" is correct
> > (posessive) form here.
> 
> Thanks for noticing. I know the difference...but still I did this
> mistake. I must focus more next time.

No worries, English is a weird language.

"Inflammable means flammable?  What a country!"
          -- Dr. Nick Riviera

--D

> 
> > 
> > Otherwise, this looks fine to me.
> 
> Thanks, version #10 is on list now.
> 
> Bye.
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-08 16:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-06 19:15 [PATCH v9 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores Pavel Reichl
2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Pavel Reichl
2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] xfs: clean up whitespace in xfs_isilocked() calls Pavel Reichl
2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] xfs: xfs_isilocked() can only check a single lock type Pavel Reichl
2020-10-06 19:15 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores Pavel Reichl
2020-10-07  1:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-07 14:17     ` Eric Sandeen
2020-10-07 15:25       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-07 21:15         ` Pavel Reichl
2020-10-07 21:55           ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-08 13:55             ` Pavel Reichl
2020-10-08 16:16               ` Darrick J. Wong

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).