* [LSFMMBPF 2021] A status update @ 2020-12-04 15:48 Josef Bacik 2020-12-12 17:29 ` Matthew Wilcox 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Josef Bacik @ 2020-12-04 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Btrfs BTRFS, linux-ext4, Linux FS Devel, bpf, linux-xfs, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-block, linux-scsi, linux-mm, linux-nvme Hello, We on the program committee hope everybody has been able to stay safe and healthy during this challenging time, and look forward to being able to see all of you in person again when it is safe. The current plans for LSFMMBPF 2021 are to schedule an in person conference in H2 (after June) of 2021. The tentative plan is to use the same hotel that we had planned to use for 2020, as we still have contracts with them. However clearly that is not set in stone. The Linux Foundation has done a wonderful job of working with us to formulate a plan and figure out the logistics that will work the best for everybody, I really can't thank them enough for their help. Once we have a finalized date we will redo the CFP emails, probably coming out March time frame. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to respond to this email, or email me or any of the other PC members privately and we will do our best to answer your questions. Rest assured the general timing of the conference is going to take into account the wide variety of schedules that we are dealing with, and we will do our best to come up with something that works for as many as people as possible. We hope that you and your families continue to stay safe and health. Thank you on behalf of the program committee: Josef Bacik (Filesystems) Amir Goldstein (Filesystems) Martin K. Petersen (Storage) Omar Sandoval (Storage) Michal Hocko (MM) Dan Williams (MM) Alexei Starovoitov (BPF) Daniel Borkmann (BPF) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LSFMMBPF 2021] A status update 2020-12-04 15:48 [LSFMMBPF 2021] A status update Josef Bacik @ 2020-12-12 17:29 ` Matthew Wilcox 2020-12-15 12:23 ` Michal Hocko 2021-01-05 20:30 ` Joao Martins 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2020-12-12 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Josef Bacik Cc: Btrfs BTRFS, linux-ext4, Linux FS Devel, bpf, linux-xfs, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-block, linux-scsi, linux-mm, linux-nvme On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > We on the program committee hope everybody has been able to stay safe and > healthy during this challenging time, and look forward to being able to see > all of you in person again when it is safe. > > The current plans for LSFMMBPF 2021 are to schedule an in person conference > in H2 (after June) of 2021. The tentative plan is to use the same hotel > that we had planned to use for 2020, as we still have contracts with them. > However clearly that is not set in stone. The Linux Foundation has done a > wonderful job of working with us to formulate a plan and figure out the > logistics that will work the best for everybody, I really can't thank them > enough for their help. Thank you all for doing your best in the face of this disruption. I really appreciate all the work you're putting in, and I can't wait to see you all again in person. I hosted a Zoom call yesterday on the topic of Page Folios, and uploaded the video. There was interest expressed in the call on doing a follow-up call on the topic of GUP (get_user_pages and friends). It would probably also be good to have meetings on other topics. I don't want this to be seen in any way as taking away from LSFMMBPF. I see Zoom calls as an interim solution to not having face-to-face meetings. I'd like to solicit feedback from this group on: - Time of day. There is no good time that suits everyone around the world. With developers in basically every inhabited time zone, the call will definitely take place in the middle of somebody's night, and during somebody else's normal family time. Publishing the recordings helps ameliorate some of this, but I feel we should shift the time around. Having it at the same time of day helps people fit it into their schedule of other meetings (and meals), but I think the benefits of allowing more people to participate live outweighs the costs. - Schedule. Friday's probably a bad day to have it, as it ends up being Saturday for some people. It can move around the week too. Also, probably wise to not have it over Christmas as most developers have that period as family time. - Topics. I'm sure there's no shortage of things to discuss! I'm happy to organise meetings for people even on topics I have no direct interest in. And most urgently, when should we have the GUP meeting? On the call, I suggested Friday the 8th of January, but I'm happy to set something up for next week if we'd like to talk more urgently. Please propose a date & time. I know we have people in Portugal and Nova Scotia who need to be involved live, so a time friendly to UTC+0 and UTC-4 would be good. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LSFMMBPF 2021] A status update 2020-12-12 17:29 ` Matthew Wilcox @ 2020-12-15 12:23 ` Michal Hocko 2020-12-15 13:43 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-05 20:30 ` Joao Martins 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Michal Hocko @ 2020-12-15 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Josef Bacik, Btrfs BTRFS, linux-ext4, Linux FS Devel, bpf, linux-xfs, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-block, linux-scsi, linux-mm, linux-nvme On Sat 12-12-20 17:29:57, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > We on the program committee hope everybody has been able to stay safe and > > healthy during this challenging time, and look forward to being able to see > > all of you in person again when it is safe. > > > > The current plans for LSFMMBPF 2021 are to schedule an in person conference > > in H2 (after June) of 2021. The tentative plan is to use the same hotel > > that we had planned to use for 2020, as we still have contracts with them. > > However clearly that is not set in stone. The Linux Foundation has done a > > wonderful job of working with us to formulate a plan and figure out the > > logistics that will work the best for everybody, I really can't thank them > > enough for their help. > > Thank you all for doing your best in the face of this disruption. I > really appreciate all the work you're putting in, and I can't wait to > see you all again in person. > > I hosted a Zoom call yesterday on the topic of Page Folios, and uploaded > the video. Thanks for organizing this. I couldn't attent directly but I have watched the video. I think this was a useful meeting. > There was interest expressed in the call on doing a follow-up > call on the topic of GUP (get_user_pages and friends). It would probably > also be good to have meetings on other topics. I hope I will have time to join this one. > I don't want this to be seen in any way as taking away from LSFMMBPF. > I see Zoom calls as an interim solution to not having face-to-face > meetings. Agreed! > I'd like to solicit feedback from this group on: > > - Time of day. There is no good time that suits everyone around > the world. With developers in basically every inhabited time zone, the > call will definitely take place in the middle of somebody's night, and > during somebody else's normal family time. Publishing the recordings > helps ameliorate some of this, but I feel we should shift the time > around. Having it at the same time of day helps people fit it into > their schedule of other meetings (and meals), but I think the benefits > of allowing more people to participate live outweighs the costs. Hard question without any good answer. You can rotate preferred timezone which should spread the suffering. > - Schedule. Friday's probably a bad day to have it, as it ends up > being Saturday for some people. It can move around the week too. > Also, probably wise to not have it over Christmas as most developers > have that period as family time. Yes, Friday tends to be not great. I think mid week should work better as the overalap > - Topics. I'm sure there's no shortage of things to discuss! I'm > happy to organise meetings for people even on topics I have no direct > interest in. Thanks for organizing this. I am pretty sure poeple will land on topics either in the call or over email. > And most urgently, when should we have the GUP meeting? On the call, > I suggested Friday the 8th of January, but I'm happy to set something > up for next week if we'd like to talk more urgently. I am unlikely to be able to join before the end of year so if you ask me. Thanks again and fingers crossed we can actually have a face to face meeting sometimes during next year. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LSFMMBPF 2021] A status update 2020-12-15 12:23 ` Michal Hocko @ 2020-12-15 13:43 ` Hannes Reinecke 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2020-12-15 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michal Hocko, Matthew Wilcox Cc: Josef Bacik, Btrfs BTRFS, linux-ext4, Linux FS Devel, bpf, linux-xfs, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-block, linux-scsi, linux-mm, linux-nvme On 12/15/20 1:23 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Sat 12-12-20 17:29:57, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: >>> We on the program committee hope everybody has been able to stay safe and >>> healthy during this challenging time, and look forward to being able to see >>> all of you in person again when it is safe. >>> >>> The current plans for LSFMMBPF 2021 are to schedule an in person conference >>> in H2 (after June) of 2021. The tentative plan is to use the same hotel >>> that we had planned to use for 2020, as we still have contracts with them. >>> However clearly that is not set in stone. The Linux Foundation has done a >>> wonderful job of working with us to formulate a plan and figure out the >>> logistics that will work the best for everybody, I really can't thank them >>> enough for their help. >> >> Thank you all for doing your best in the face of this disruption. I >> really appreciate all the work you're putting in, and I can't wait to >> see you all again in person. >> >> I hosted a Zoom call yesterday on the topic of Page Folios, and uploaded >> the video. > > Thanks for organizing this. I couldn't attent directly but I have > watched the video. I think this was a useful meeting. > >> There was interest expressed in the call on doing a follow-up >> call on the topic of GUP (get_user_pages and friends). It would probably >> also be good to have meetings on other topics. > > I hope I will have time to join this one. > >> I don't want this to be seen in any way as taking away from LSFMMBPF. >> I see Zoom calls as an interim solution to not having face-to-face >> meetings. > > Agreed! > >> I'd like to solicit feedback from this group on: >> >> - Time of day. There is no good time that suits everyone around >> the world. With developers in basically every inhabited time zone, the >> call will definitely take place in the middle of somebody's night, and >> during somebody else's normal family time. Publishing the recordings >> helps ameliorate some of this, but I feel we should shift the time >> around. Having it at the same time of day helps people fit it into >> their schedule of other meetings (and meals), but I think the benefits >> of allowing more people to participate live outweighs the costs. > > Hard question without any good answer. You can rotate preferred timezone > which should spread the suffering. > What I found useful is to have a fixed schedule for the actual talk, but keep the recording online for an extended time (say 24h). And require the presenters to be available in a break-out room for any questions for an extended time, too. That way any participant can choose which time would suit him best to watch the presentation, _and_ being reasonably sure that he can fire up questions later on. >> - Schedule. Friday's probably a bad day to have it, as it ends up >> being Saturday for some people. It can move around the week too. >> Also, probably wise to not have it over Christmas as most developers >> have that period as family time. > > Yes, Friday tends to be not great. I think mid week should work better > as the overalap > >> - Topics. I'm sure there's no shortage of things to discuss! I'm >> happy to organise meetings for people even on topics I have no direct >> interest in. > > Thanks for organizing this. I am pretty sure poeple will land on topics > either in the call or over email. > >> And most urgently, when should we have the GUP meeting? On the call, >> I suggested Friday the 8th of January, but I'm happy to set something >> up for next week if we'd like to talk more urgently. > > I am unlikely to be able to join before the end of year so if you ask > me. > > Thanks again and fingers crossed we can actually have a face to face > meeting sometimes during next year. > I'd side with Michal here; having something this year will be challenging, as quite some ppl (myself included) will be on holiday. Rather move it to start of next year; mid-February would be a good time, giving enough room to organize etc. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LSFMMBPF 2021] A status update 2020-12-12 17:29 ` Matthew Wilcox 2020-12-15 12:23 ` Michal Hocko @ 2021-01-05 20:30 ` Joao Martins 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Joao Martins @ 2021-01-05 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Btrfs BTRFS, Josef Bacik, linux-ext4, Linux FS Devel, bpf, linux-xfs, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-block, linux-scsi, linux-mm, linux-nvme On 12/12/20 5:29 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > And most urgently, when should we have the GUP meeting? On the call, > I suggested Friday the 8th of January, but I'm happy to set something > up for next week if we'd like to talk more urgently. Please propose a > date & time. I know we have people in Portugal and Nova Scotia who need > to be involved live, so a time friendly to UTC+0 and UTC-4 would be good. FWIW, I would suggest the same time as you had for PageFolio (18h GMT / 10pm PT / 13h ET) given it can cover many tz in a not-so-bothersome time. But instead of Jan 8 perhaps better for next week (Jan 15) in case folks are still in new year holidays (given we are in the first week of the year). Joao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-05 20:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-12-04 15:48 [LSFMMBPF 2021] A status update Josef Bacik 2020-12-12 17:29 ` Matthew Wilcox 2020-12-15 12:23 ` Michal Hocko 2020-12-15 13:43 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-05 20:30 ` Joao Martins
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).