linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Fix possible leaked device node reference
@ 2015-04-30  1:44 Nathan Fontenot
  2015-04-30 21:58 ` Tyrel Datwyler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Fontenot @ 2015-04-30  1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev, Michael Ellerman

Failure return from dlpar_configure_connector when dlpar adding cpus
results in leaking references to the cpus parent device node. Move the
call to of_node_put() prior to checking the result of
dlpar_configure_connector.

Fixes: 8d5ff320766f ("powerpc/pseries: Make dlpar_configure_connector parent node aware")

Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
index 019d34a..47d9cebe 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
@@ -421,11 +421,10 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_probe(const char *buf, size_t count)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	dn = dlpar_configure_connector(cpu_to_be32(drc_index), parent);
+	of_node_put(parent);
 	if (!dn)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	of_node_put(parent);
-
 	rc = dlpar_attach_node(dn);
 	if (rc) {
 		dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Fix possible leaked device node reference
  2015-04-30  1:44 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Fix possible leaked device node reference Nathan Fontenot
@ 2015-04-30 21:58 ` Tyrel Datwyler
  2015-04-30 23:47   ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tyrel Datwyler @ 2015-04-30 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nathan Fontenot, linuxppc-dev, Michael Ellerman

On 04/29/2015 06:44 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> Failure return from dlpar_configure_connector when dlpar adding cpus
> results in leaking references to the cpus parent device node. Move the
> call to of_node_put() prior to checking the result of
> dlpar_configure_connector.
> 
> Fixes: 8d5ff320766f ("powerpc/pseries: Make dlpar_configure_connector parent node aware")

That commit went into 3.12. Shouldn't this be CC to stable?

-Tyrel

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c |    3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> index 019d34a..47d9cebe 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> @@ -421,11 +421,10 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_probe(const char *buf, size_t count)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	dn = dlpar_configure_connector(cpu_to_be32(drc_index), parent);
> +	of_node_put(parent);
>  	if (!dn)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	of_node_put(parent);
> -
>  	rc = dlpar_attach_node(dn);
>  	if (rc) {
>  		dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Fix possible leaked device node reference
  2015-04-30 21:58 ` Tyrel Datwyler
@ 2015-04-30 23:47   ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2015-04-30 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tyrel Datwyler; +Cc: Nathan Fontenot, linuxppc-dev

On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:58 -0700, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 06:44 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> > Failure return from dlpar_configure_connector when dlpar adding cpus
> > results in leaking references to the cpus parent device node. Move the
> > call to of_node_put() prior to checking the result of
> > dlpar_configure_connector.
> > 
> > Fixes: 8d5ff320766f ("powerpc/pseries: Make dlpar_configure_connector parent node aware")
> 
> That commit went into 3.12. Shouldn't this be CC to stable?

It could, but it fails the "real bug" test:

 - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
   problem..." type thing).

(from Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt)

Because the node we're leaking a reference on is /cpus, and in practice that's
pretty harmless.

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-30 23:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-30  1:44 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Fix possible leaked device node reference Nathan Fontenot
2015-04-30 21:58 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2015-04-30 23:47   ` Michael Ellerman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).