* [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo
@ 2015-06-03 4:51 Vaibhav Jain
2015-06-03 5:34 ` Neelesh Gupta
2015-07-08 3:25 ` Michael Neuling
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vaibhav Jain @ 2015-06-03 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Neelesh Gupta, Vaibhav Jain
rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
times-power-on(tpo). However some platforms like BML use a fake rtc
clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the missing
'has-tpo' property in the device tree.
Current implementation however enables callback for
rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.
This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
callback pointers only when tpo is supported.
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
index 7061dca..1125641 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
@@ -190,11 +190,9 @@ exit:
return rc;
}
-static const struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
+static struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
.read_time = opal_get_rtc_time,
.set_time = opal_set_rtc_time,
- .read_alarm = opal_get_tpo_time,
- .set_alarm = opal_set_tpo_time,
};
static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -202,8 +200,11 @@ static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct rtc_device *rtc;
if (pdev->dev.of_node && of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "has-tpo",
- NULL))
+ NULL)) {
device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
+ opal_rtc_ops.read_alarm = opal_get_tpo_time;
+ opal_rtc_ops.set_alarm = opal_set_tpo_time;
+ }
rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DRVNAME, &opal_rtc_ops,
THIS_MODULE);
--
2.2.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo
2015-06-03 4:51 [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo Vaibhav Jain
@ 2015-06-03 5:34 ` Neelesh Gupta
2015-07-08 3:25 ` Michael Neuling
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neelesh Gupta @ 2015-06-03 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vaibhav Jain, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1926 bytes --]
On 06/03/2015 10:21 AM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
> times-power-on(tpo). However some platforms like BML use a fake rtc
> clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the missing
> 'has-tpo' property in the device tree.
>
> Current implementation however enables callback for
> rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
> platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
> an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.
>
> This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
> callback pointers only when tpo is supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Neelesh.
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> index 7061dca..1125641 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> @@ -190,11 +190,9 @@ exit:
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static const struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
> +static struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
> .read_time = opal_get_rtc_time,
> .set_time = opal_set_rtc_time,
> - .read_alarm = opal_get_tpo_time,
> - .set_alarm = opal_set_tpo_time,
> };
>
> static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -202,8 +200,11 @@ static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct rtc_device *rtc;
>
> if (pdev->dev.of_node && of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "has-tpo",
> - NULL))
> + NULL)) {
> device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
> + opal_rtc_ops.read_alarm = opal_get_tpo_time;
> + opal_rtc_ops.set_alarm = opal_set_tpo_time;
> + }
>
> rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DRVNAME, &opal_rtc_ops,
> THIS_MODULE);
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2682 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo
2015-06-03 4:51 [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo Vaibhav Jain
2015-06-03 5:34 ` Neelesh Gupta
@ 2015-07-08 3:25 ` Michael Neuling
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Neuling @ 2015-07-08 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vaibhav Jain; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Neelesh Gupta
> [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo
I'd prefer to avoid the double negative and extra words. ie.
rtc/opal: Enable alarms only when opal supports tpo
But looks good other than that.
Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 10:21 +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
> times-power-on(tpo). However some platforms like BML use a fake rtc
> clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the missing
> 'has-tpo' property in the device tree.
>=20
> Current implementation however enables callback for
> rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
> platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
> an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.
>=20
> This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
> callback pointers only when tpo is supported.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> index 7061dca..1125641 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> @@ -190,11 +190,9 @@ exit:
> return rc;
> }
> =20
> -static const struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops =3D {
> +static struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops =3D {
> .read_time =3D opal_get_rtc_time,
> .set_time =3D opal_set_rtc_time,
> - .read_alarm =3D opal_get_tpo_time,
> - .set_alarm =3D opal_set_tpo_time,
> };
> =20
> static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -202,8 +200,11 @@ static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pd=
ev)
> struct rtc_device *rtc;
> =20
> if (pdev->dev.of_node && of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "has-tpo",
> - NULL))
> + NULL)) {
> device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
> + opal_rtc_ops.read_alarm =3D opal_get_tpo_time;
> + opal_rtc_ops.set_alarm =3D opal_set_tpo_time;
> + }
> =20
> rtc =3D devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DRVNAME, &opal_rtc_ops,
> THIS_MODULE);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-08 3:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-03 4:51 [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo Vaibhav Jain
2015-06-03 5:34 ` Neelesh Gupta
2015-07-08 3:25 ` Michael Neuling
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).