linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm: unify checks in alloc_pages_node() and __alloc_pages_node()
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:34:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438274071-22551-2-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438274071-22551-1-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>

Perform the same debug checks in alloc_pages_node() as are done in
__alloc_pages_node(), by making the former function a wrapper of the latter
one.

In addition to better diagnostics in DEBUG_VM builds for situations which
have been already fatal (e.g. out-of-bounds node id), there are two visible
changes for potential existing buggy callers of alloc_pages_node():

- calling alloc_pages_node() with any negative nid (e.g. due to arithmetic
  overflow) was treated as passing NUMA_NO_NODE and fallback to local node was
  applied. This will now be fatal.
- calling alloc_pages_node() with an offline node will now be checked for
  DEBUG_VM builds. Since it's not fatal if the node has been previously online,
  and this patch may expose some existing buggy callers, change the VM_BUG_ON
  in __alloc_pages_node() to VM_WARN_ON.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
v3: I think this is enough for what patch 4/4 in v2 tried to provide on top,
    so there's no patch 4/4 anymore. The DEBUG_VM-only fixup didn't seem
    justified to me.

 include/linux/gfp.h | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
index d2c142b..4a12cae2 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -310,23 +310,23 @@ __alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 static inline struct page *
 __alloc_pages_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 {
-	VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(nid));
+	VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
+	VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid));
 
 	return __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order, node_zonelist(nid, gfp_mask));
 }
 
 /*
  * Allocate pages, preferring the node given as nid. When nid == NUMA_NO_NODE,
- * prefer the current CPU's node.
+ * prefer the current CPU's node. Otherwise node must be valid and online.
  */
 static inline struct page *alloc_pages_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 						unsigned int order)
 {
-	/* Unknown node is current node */
-	if (nid < 0)
+	if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
 		nid = numa_node_id();
 
-	return __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order, node_zonelist(nid, gfp_mask));
+	return __alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp_mask, order);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-- 
2.4.6

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-30 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-30 16:34 [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: rename alloc_pages_exact_node to __alloc_pages_node Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 16:34 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2015-07-30 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm: unify checks in alloc_pages_node() and __alloc_pages_node() Johannes Weiner
2015-07-30 17:59   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-30 16:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node() Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 17:41   ` Johannes Weiner
2015-08-06  7:00     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 17:59   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-30 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: rename alloc_pages_exact_node to __alloc_pages_node Johannes Weiner
2015-07-30 17:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-30 19:59   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 20:07     ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-31 21:25     ` David Rientjes
2015-07-31 21:45       ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1438274071-22551-2-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).