From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Cliff Whickman <cpw@sgi.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Robin Holt <robinmholt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: rename alloc_pages_exact_node to __alloc_pages_node
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:33:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150730173318.GA15257@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438274071-22551-1-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:34:29PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The function alloc_pages_exact_node() was introduced in 6484eb3e2a81 ("page
> allocator: do not check NUMA node ID when the caller knows the node is valid")
> as an optimized variant of alloc_pages_node(), that doesn't fallback to current
> node for nid == NUMA_NO_NODE. Unfortunately the name of the function can easily
> suggest that the allocation is restricted to the given node and fails
> otherwise. In truth, the node is only preferred, unless __GFP_THISNODE is
> passed among the gfp flags.
>
> The misleading name has lead to mistakes in the past, see 5265047ac301 ("mm,
> thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node") and
> b360edb43f8e ("mm, mempolicy: migrate_to_node should only migrate to node").
>
> Another issue with the name is that there's a family of alloc_pages_exact*()
> functions where 'exact' means exact size (instead of page order), which leads
> to more confusion.
>
> To prevent further mistakes, this patch effectively renames
> alloc_pages_exact_node() to __alloc_pages_node() to better convey that it's
> an optimized variant of alloc_pages_node() not intended for general usage.
> Both functions get described in comments.
>
> It has been also considered to really provide a convenience function for
> allocations restricted to a node, but the major opinion seems to be that
> __GFP_THISNODE already provides that functionality and we shouldn't duplicate
> the API needlessly. The number of users would be small anyway.
>
> Existing callers of alloc_pages_exact_node() are simply converted to call
> __alloc_pages_node(), with two exceptions. sba_alloc_coherent() and
> slob_new_page() both open-code the check for NUMA_NO_NODE, so they are
> converted to use alloc_pages_node() instead. This means they no longer perform
> some VM_BUG_ON checks, and since the current check for nid in
> alloc_pages_node() uses a 'nid < 0' comparison (which includes NUMA_NO_NODE),
> it may hide wrong values which would be previously exposed. Both differences
> will be rectified by the next patch.
>
> To sum up, this patch makes no functional changes, except temporarily hiding
> potentially buggy callers. Restricting the checks in alloc_pages_node() is
> left for the next patch which can in turn expose more existing buggy callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Cliff Whickman <cpw@sgi.com>
> Acked-by: Robin Holt <robinmholt@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 16:34 [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: rename alloc_pages_exact_node to __alloc_pages_node Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 16:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm: unify checks in alloc_pages_node() and __alloc_pages_node() Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 17:35 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-07-30 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-30 16:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node() Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 17:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-08-06 7:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-30 17:33 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2015-07-30 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: rename alloc_pages_exact_node to __alloc_pages_node Christoph Lameter
2015-07-30 19:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-30 20:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-31 21:25 ` David Rientjes
2015-07-31 21:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150730173318.GA15257@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robinmholt@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).