* Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
@ 2008-09-22 22:08 Grant Likely
2008-09-22 22:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-09-22 23:09 ` Jeremy Kerr
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2008-09-22 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Kerr, linuxppc-dev, linux-embedded, Paul Mackerras
Jeremy,
Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
linuxppc-dev? I don't think we need two separate lists anymore and
patches to linuxppc-embedded don't always get dealt with.
Anyone have any objections to eliminating linuxppc-embedded?
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-22 22:08 Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev Grant Likely
@ 2008-09-22 22:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-09-22 22:20 ` Grant Likely
2008-09-22 23:09 ` Jeremy Kerr
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-09-22 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, Jeremy Kerr, linux-embedded
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 18:08, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
> linuxppc-dev? I don't think we need two separate lists anymore and
> patches to linuxppc-embedded don't always get dealt with.
>
> Anyone have any objections to eliminating linuxppc-embedded?
you sent this e-mail to "linux-embedded" instead of "linuxppc-embedded"
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-22 22:11 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2008-09-22 22:20 ` Grant Likely
2008-09-25 3:15 ` Li Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2008-09-22 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger
Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, Jeremy Kerr, linux-embedded,
linuxppc-embedded
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 18:08, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>> Jeremy,
>>
>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
>> linuxppc-dev? I don't think we need two separate lists anymore and
>> patches to linuxppc-embedded don't always get dealt with.
>>
>> Anyone have any objections to eliminating linuxppc-embedded?
>
> you sent this e-mail to "linux-embedded" instead of "linuxppc-embedded"
> -mike
See! My point proven! That list just causes confusion. :-)
Oops. I've cc'd the linuxppc-embedded list now. Sorry to all the
non-powerpc linux-embedded folks for the noise.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-22 22:08 Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev Grant Likely
2008-09-22 22:11 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2008-09-22 23:09 ` Jeremy Kerr
2008-09-22 23:34 ` Kumar Gala
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Kerr @ 2008-09-22 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, linux-embedded
Hi Grant,
> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
> linuxppc-dev?
That's not really up to me - more of a community question I think. I
imagine Paul would have the final decision though.
Cheers,
Jeremy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-22 23:09 ` Jeremy Kerr
@ 2008-09-22 23:34 ` Kumar Gala
2008-09-23 4:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2008-09-24 7:29 ` Martyn Welch
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2008-09-22 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Kerr; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, linux-embedded
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
>> linuxppc-dev?
>
> That's not really up to me - more of a community question I think. I
> imagine Paul would have the final decision though.
I'm pretty sure I saw paul gripe about this on irc just the other day.
My vote is to kill linuxppc-embedded.
- k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-22 23:34 ` Kumar Gala
@ 2008-09-23 4:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2008-09-23 14:55 ` Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)
2008-09-23 14:58 ` Becky Bruce
2008-09-24 7:29 ` Martyn Welch
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2008-09-23 4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, Jeremy Kerr, linuxppc-embedded
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:34:37PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
>>> linuxppc-dev?
>>
>> That's not really up to me - more of a community question I think. I
>> imagine Paul would have the final decision though.
>
> I'm pretty sure I saw paul gripe about this on irc just the other day.
>
> My vote is to kill linuxppc-embedded.
I also think one list will suffice nowadays.
Wolfram
--
Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-23 4:53 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2008-09-23 14:55 ` Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)
2008-09-23 14:58 ` Becky Bruce
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Koss, Mike (Mission Systems) @ 2008-09-23 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, Kumar Gala
Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, Jeremy Kerr, linuxppc-embedded
>>>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it=20
>>>> with linuxppc-dev?
>>>
>>> That's not really up to me - more of a community question I think. I
>>> imagine Paul would have the final decision though.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I saw paul gripe about this on irc just the other
day.
>>
>> My vote is to kill linuxppc-embedded.
>
> I also think one list will suffice nowadays.
>
> Wolfram
I liked not having to deal w/ all of the desktop/Cell traffic, but I
have to be signed up for both lists to watch all of it anyways since
some embedded never made it to the -embedded list.=20
So my vote is "Yes" as well.
<goodbye embedded ::sniff::>
- Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-23 4:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2008-09-23 14:55 ` Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)
@ 2008-09-23 14:58 ` Becky Bruce
2008-09-23 15:01 ` Timur Tabi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Becky Bruce @ 2008-09-23 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linuxppc-embedded, Paul Mackerras, Jeremy Kerr
On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:34:37PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>>>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it
>>>> with
>>>> linuxppc-dev?
>>>
>>> That's not really up to me - more of a community question I think. I
>>> imagine Paul would have the final decision though.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I saw paul gripe about this on irc just the other
>> day.
>>
>> My vote is to kill linuxppc-embedded.
>
> I also think one list will suffice nowadays.
I also vote to kill the separate embedded list. It has such low
traffic, and it seems like a lot of messages end up cross-posted to
linuxppc-dev, anyway.
Cheers,
B
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-23 14:58 ` Becky Bruce
@ 2008-09-23 15:01 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2008-09-23 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
> I also vote to kill the separate embedded list. It has such low traffic,
> and it seems like a lot of messages end up cross-posted to linuxppc-dev,
> anyway.
I also agree that we should kill linuxppc-embedded.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-22 23:34 ` Kumar Gala
2008-09-23 4:53 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2008-09-24 7:29 ` Martyn Welch
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Martyn Welch @ 2008-09-24 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:34:37 -0500
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>
> > Hi Grant,
> >
> >> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
> >> linuxppc-dev?
> >
> > That's not really up to me - more of a community question I think. I
> > imagine Paul would have the final decision though.
>
> I'm pretty sure I saw paul gripe about this on irc just the other day.
>
> My vote is to kill linuxppc-embedded.
>
I agree.
Martyn
--
Martyn Welch MEng MPhil MIET (Principal Software Engineer) T:+44(0)1327322748
GE Fanuc Intelligent Platforms Ltd, |Registered in England and Wales
Tove Valley Business Park, Towcester, |(3828642) at 100 Barbirolli Square,
Northants, NN12 6PF, UK T:+44(0)1327359444 |Manchester,M2 3AB VAT:GB 729849476
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
2008-09-22 22:20 ` Grant Likely
@ 2008-09-25 3:15 ` Li Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Yang @ 2008-09-25 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely
Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, Jeremy Kerr, Mike Frysinger,
linuxppc-embedded
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 18:08, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>>> Jeremy,
>>>
>>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
>>> linuxppc-dev? I don't think we need two separate lists anymore and
>>> patches to linuxppc-embedded don't always get dealt with.
>>>
>>> Anyone have any objections to eliminating linuxppc-embedded?
>>
>> you sent this e-mail to "linux-embedded" instead of "linuxppc-embedded"
>> -mike
>
> See! My point proven! That list just causes confusion. :-)
>
> Oops. I've cc'd the linuxppc-embedded list now. Sorry to all the
> non-powerpc linux-embedded folks for the noise.
I agree. Given the fact that most active embedded people are already
watching the linuxppc-dev list. It's a good idea for embedded people
not having to subscribe two lists. But I don't know if non-embedded
people would like this idea.
- Leo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
[not found] <mailman.1665.1222182678.3127.linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
@ 2008-09-23 15:19 ` Wright, Chuck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wright, Chuck @ 2008-09-23 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
I also watch both lists.
A merge seems like a good idea.
Chuck
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-25 3:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-22 22:08 Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev Grant Likely
2008-09-22 22:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-09-22 22:20 ` Grant Likely
2008-09-25 3:15 ` Li Yang
2008-09-22 23:09 ` Jeremy Kerr
2008-09-22 23:34 ` Kumar Gala
2008-09-23 4:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2008-09-23 14:55 ` Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)
2008-09-23 14:58 ` Becky Bruce
2008-09-23 15:01 ` Timur Tabi
2008-09-24 7:29 ` Martyn Welch
[not found] <mailman.1665.1222182678.3127.linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
2008-09-23 15:19 ` Wright, Chuck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).